• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
The Decision Problem for Standard Classes
The Decision Problem for Standard Classes

Lecture 23 Notes
Lecture 23 Notes

pdf
pdf

Examples of Ground Resolution Proofs 1 Ground Resolution
Examples of Ground Resolution Proofs 1 Ground Resolution

Comparing Constructive Arithmetical Theories Based - Math
Comparing Constructive Arithmetical Theories Based - Math

... (2d) If A ∈ Σbi+1 and B ∈ Πbi+1 , then ¬B and B → A are in Σbi+1 . (3) Πbi+1 is defined inductively as follows: (3a) Σbi ⊆ Πbi+1 ; (3b) If A ∈ Πbi+1 , so are (∀x 6 t)A and (∃x 6 |t|)A; (3c) If A, B ∈ Πbi+1 , so are A ∧ B and A ∨ B; (3d) If A ∈ Πbi+1 and B ∈ Σbi+1 , then ¬B and B → A are in Πbi+1 . ( ...
Godel`s Incompleteness Theorem
Godel`s Incompleteness Theorem

... • We found that we could indeed prove several (non-trivial) theorems about arithmetic from the Peano Axioms. Cool! • We also found that some arithmetical truths could not be derived from the original 6 Peano axioms. Not cool! • But then we also found that if we added an axiom scheme reflecting mathe ...
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC Lecture 6 Natural Deduction Proofs in
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC Lecture 6 Natural Deduction Proofs in

... Proofs in Natural Deduction Proofs in Natural Deduction are trees of L2 -sentences ...
Class 8: Lines and Angles (Lecture Notes) – Part 1
Class 8: Lines and Angles (Lecture Notes) – Part 1

... Axioms. Therefore, the axiom can be used as the premise or starting point for further reasoning or arguments, usually in logic or in mathematics. Example: A line is composed of infinite points. The halves of equals are equal. 2. Statement: A statement (or proposition) is a sentence that is either tr ...
Class 8: Chapter 27 – Lines and Angles (Lecture
Class 8: Chapter 27 – Lines and Angles (Lecture

Strict Predicativity 3
Strict Predicativity 3

... doubted that interpretability in Q would be preserved if exponentiation is added, thus going beyond the feasible. Subsequently it was shown that IΔ0 + exp is not interpretable in Q, confirming Nelson’s doubt. Thus Nelson’s criterion puts the boundary of strict predicativity somewhere between feasibl ...
The Diagonal Lemma Fails in Aristotelian Logic
The Diagonal Lemma Fails in Aristotelian Logic

Elements of Modal Logic - University of Victoria
Elements of Modal Logic - University of Victoria

Exam 2 study guide
Exam 2 study guide

... Proving a formula of the form …φ→…ψ, where the conditional φ→ψ is provable: first prove the conditional φ→ψ, then Necessitate, then distribute the … over the → using K…. Proving a formula of the form ◊φ→◊ψ, where the conditional φ→ψ is provable. As above, but use K◊. Proving a formula of the form …φ ...
Document
Document

.pdf
.pdf

Identity and Philosophical Problems of Symbolic Logic
Identity and Philosophical Problems of Symbolic Logic

... logic. But it has been argued that most natural language sentences do not have two truth-values. ...
Discrete Computational Structures (CS 225) Definition of Formal Proof
Discrete Computational Structures (CS 225) Definition of Formal Proof

2 - DePaul University
2 - DePaul University

Predicate Calculus pt. 2
Predicate Calculus pt. 2

... Exercise 1 A set of propositional formulas T is called satisfiable iff there is an assignment of the occuring variables which makes all formulas in T true. The compactness theorem of propositional logic says: T is satisfiable iff every finite subset of T is satisfiable. Proof the compactness theorem ...
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs

Chapter 2  - Princeton University Press
Chapter 2 - Princeton University Press

... to do so would be highly impractical. Even partial formalization of a two-page paper on differential equations would turn it into a 50-page paper. For analogy, imagine a cake recipe written by a nuclear physicist, describing the locations and quantities of the electrons, protons, etc., that are incl ...
Is `structure` a clear notion? - University of Illinois at Chicago
Is `structure` a clear notion? - University of Illinois at Chicago

... by non-logicians. From the standpoint of formalization, fixing the vocabulary is a first step, singling out the ‘primitive concepts’. Considerable reflection from both mathematical and philosophical standpoints may be involved in the choice. For example, suppose one wants to study ‘Napoleon’s theore ...
Definition - Rogelio Davila
Definition - Rogelio Davila

... The problem of finding at least one model of the set of formulas  that is also a model of the formula , is known as the propositional satisfiability (PSAT) problem. An exhaustive procedure for solving the PSAT problem is to try systematically all of the ways to assign True and False to the atoms i ...
Surprising Connections between Partitions and Divisors
Surprising Connections between Partitions and Divisors

... “partitions” of a given number as sums of positive integers. For example, the seven partitions of 5 are 5, 4 + 1, 3 + 2, 3 + 1 + 1, 2 + 2 + 1, 2 + 1 + 1 + 1, and 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1. The “partition function” p(n) is defined as the number of partitions of n. Thus, p(5) = 7. Prime numbers and divisors ...
Early_Term_Test Comments
Early_Term_Test Comments

< 1 ... 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 ... 72 >

Mathematical logic

Mathematical logic is a subfield of mathematics exploring the applications of formal logic to mathematics. It bears close connections to metamathematics, the foundations of mathematics, and theoretical computer science. The unifying themes in mathematical logic include the study of the expressive power of formal systems and the deductive power of formal proof systems.Mathematical logic is often divided into the fields of set theory, model theory, recursion theory, and proof theory. These areas share basic results on logic, particularly first-order logic, and definability. In computer science (particularly in the ACM Classification) mathematical logic encompasses additional topics not detailed in this article; see Logic in computer science for those.Since its inception, mathematical logic has both contributed to, and has been motivated by, the study of foundations of mathematics. This study began in the late 19th century with the development of axiomatic frameworks for geometry, arithmetic, and analysis. In the early 20th century it was shaped by David Hilbert's program to prove the consistency of foundational theories. Results of Kurt Gödel, Gerhard Gentzen, and others provided partial resolution to the program, and clarified the issues involved in proving consistency. Work in set theory showed that almost all ordinary mathematics can be formalized in terms of sets, although there are some theorems that cannot be proven in common axiom systems for set theory. Contemporary work in the foundations of mathematics often focuses on establishing which parts of mathematics can be formalized in particular formal systems (as in reverse mathematics) rather than trying to find theories in which all of mathematics can be developed.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report