• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
The origin of the technical use of "sound argument": a postscript
The origin of the technical use of "sound argument": a postscript

Conditional and Indirect Proofs
Conditional and Indirect Proofs

HOARE`S LOGIC AND PEANO`S ARITHMETIC
HOARE`S LOGIC AND PEANO`S ARITHMETIC

PPTX
PPTX

... Pairing Functions and Gödel Numbers For each n, the function [a1, …, an] is clearly primitive recursive. Gödel numbering satisfies the following uniqueness property: Theorem 8.2: If [a1, …, an] = [b1, …, bn] then ai = bi for i = 1, …, n. This follows immediately from the fundamental theorem of arit ...
What is "formal logic"?
What is "formal logic"?

Document
Document

... proposition, Q, can be proved as follows: from P we obtain P Q by the rule of Addition; then from P Q and ~P we obtain Q by the rule of Disjunctive Syllogism. Because of this, and because set theory underlies all branches of mathematics, many people began to worry that, if set theory was inconsisten ...
To What Type of Logic Does the "Tetralemma" Belong?
To What Type of Logic Does the "Tetralemma" Belong?

... related to the distinction between what, using a different language, might have been called “positive” and “negative” propositions. Consider the (“unasserted”) propositions, A = “the electron is here” and Ā = “the electron is elsewhere”. A statement like “I see the electron here” is in some sense po ...
Many-Valued Models
Many-Valued Models

... interesting general problem and has received attention from several different areas. In this tutorial we present an elementary but general approach on small finite models, showing their relevance and reviewing some elementary methods and techniques on their uses. There are many significant names in ...
Discrete Mathematics - Lyle School of Engineering
Discrete Mathematics - Lyle School of Engineering

...  If P(x) is the statement “x has won a race” where the domain of discourse is all runners, then the universal quantification of P(x) is x, P ( x ) , i.e., every runner has won a race. The negation of this statement is “it is not the case that every runner has won a race. Therefore there exists at ...
Section 2.6 Cantor`s Theorem and the ZFC Axioms
Section 2.6 Cantor`s Theorem and the ZFC Axioms

... and uncountable. After Cantor’s death, due to the paradoxes of Bertrand Russell and others, various logicians, such as Ernst Zermelo and Abraham Fraenkel, placed the study of sets on a firm foundation with the introduction of a set of axioms. In 1938 under the framework of these axioms, the Austrian ...
A Syntactic Characterization of Minimal Entailment
A Syntactic Characterization of Minimal Entailment

... a simpler than cwaS scheme of reasoning, the only immediate conclusion one can draw from the definition of GCW A is that, similarly to cwaS (Σ), GCW A(Σ) is Π2 relative to Σ. This, probably, gave rise to introducing W GCW A, which has been demonstrated to be ∆2 relative to Σ and complete with respec ...
Automated Discovery in Pure Mathematics
Automated Discovery in Pure Mathematics

... Prove the conjectures (theorem proving) Disprove the conjectures (model generation) Assess all concepts w.r.t. new concept ...
this PDF file
this PDF file

the role of logic in teaching, learning and analyzing proof
the role of logic in teaching, learning and analyzing proof

ASSIGNMENT 3
ASSIGNMENT 3

... example, in modern Euclidean geometry the terms ‘point and ‘line’ are typically left undefined. 2. Axioms (or Postulates): An axiom (or postulate) is a logical statement about terms that is accepted without proof. For example, the statement “A straight line can be drawn from any point to any point” ...
pdf - Consequently.org
pdf - Consequently.org

... fails the demand of consistency. This is one of the tests Belnap considers in the paper. In the case of a natural deduction proof theory or a sequent calculus, we can demonstrate that this criterion is met by means of a normalisation proof or a cut elimination argument, which usually has as a conseq ...
Mathematical Logic
Mathematical Logic

... Mathematical Logic • Definition: Methods of reasoning, provides rules and techniques to determine whether an argument is valid • Theorem: a statement that can be shown to be true (under certain conditions) – Example: If x is an even integer, then x + 1 is an odd ...
Beautifying Gödel - Department of Computer Science
Beautifying Gödel - Department of Computer Science

First-Order Predicate Logic (2) - Department of Computer Science
First-Order Predicate Logic (2) - Department of Computer Science

... • F |= G means that G is true in the structure F . Checking whether this is the case for finite F coincides with querying relational database instances and can be done very efficiently. It is also the underlying problem of model checking approaches to program verification: F is a representation of a ...
THE HITCHHIKER`S GUIDE TO THE INCOMPLETENESS
THE HITCHHIKER`S GUIDE TO THE INCOMPLETENESS

CSE 321, Discrete Structures
CSE 321, Discrete Structures

Intellectual Aesthetics Of Scientific Discoveries
Intellectual Aesthetics Of Scientific Discoveries

MUltseq: a Generic Prover for Sequents and Equations*
MUltseq: a Generic Prover for Sequents and Equations*

Freshman Research Initiative: Research Methods
Freshman Research Initiative: Research Methods

pdf file
pdf file

... is the type of proof that most mathematicians would consider complete and rigorous, but that is not strictly formal in the sense of a purely syntactic derivation using a very precise and circumscribed formal set of rules of inference. In other words, I have in mind the type of proof found in a typic ...
< 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 ... 72 >

Mathematical logic

Mathematical logic is a subfield of mathematics exploring the applications of formal logic to mathematics. It bears close connections to metamathematics, the foundations of mathematics, and theoretical computer science. The unifying themes in mathematical logic include the study of the expressive power of formal systems and the deductive power of formal proof systems.Mathematical logic is often divided into the fields of set theory, model theory, recursion theory, and proof theory. These areas share basic results on logic, particularly first-order logic, and definability. In computer science (particularly in the ACM Classification) mathematical logic encompasses additional topics not detailed in this article; see Logic in computer science for those.Since its inception, mathematical logic has both contributed to, and has been motivated by, the study of foundations of mathematics. This study began in the late 19th century with the development of axiomatic frameworks for geometry, arithmetic, and analysis. In the early 20th century it was shaped by David Hilbert's program to prove the consistency of foundational theories. Results of Kurt Gödel, Gerhard Gentzen, and others provided partial resolution to the program, and clarified the issues involved in proving consistency. Work in set theory showed that almost all ordinary mathematics can be formalized in terms of sets, although there are some theorems that cannot be proven in common axiom systems for set theory. Contemporary work in the foundations of mathematics often focuses on establishing which parts of mathematics can be formalized in particular formal systems (as in reverse mathematics) rather than trying to find theories in which all of mathematics can be developed.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report