• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
What is...Linear Logic? Introduction Jonathan Skowera
What is...Linear Logic? Introduction Jonathan Skowera

... relation between ⊗ and ⊕ is U ⊗ (V ⊕ W ) ∼ = U ⊗ V ⊕ U ⊗ W . The choice of symbols reflects this relation, but proving it requires a complete list of rules of inference, and we aren’t quite there yet. Implication Using the negative, implication can be defined in analogy with the classical case where ...
Horseshoe and Turnstiles
Horseshoe and Turnstiles

Friedman`s Translation
Friedman`s Translation

Discrete Structures & Algorithms Propositional Logic
Discrete Structures & Algorithms Propositional Logic

... In day-to-day speech, sometimes we use “or” as an “exclusive or”. ...
Natural Deduction Calculus for Quantified Propositional Linear
Natural Deduction Calculus for Quantified Propositional Linear

... In this paper we continue our investigation of natural deduction framework for non-classical setting, this time tackling propositional linear-time temporal logic extended with propositional quantification [Sistla (1983)]. We follow the notation adopted in [French and Reynolds (2002)] calling this lo ...
Propositional logic, I (Lógica Proposicional, I)
Propositional logic, I (Lógica Proposicional, I)

... Validity: A wff is said to be valid if it has the value True under all possible interpretations. Ex. T,T∨P,¬P∨P,P⇒P,P⇒(Q⇒P),((P⇒ Q)⇒P)⇒P » A valid wff is a tautology (it is devoid of meaning about the world). Metatheorem 1: if ¬w is unsatisfiable, then the wff w is valid, and viceversa. ...
handout - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff
handout - Homepages of UvA/FNWI staff

One Problem with the Material Conditional
One Problem with the Material Conditional

Homework #5
Homework #5

IS IT EASY TO LEARN THE LOGIC
IS IT EASY TO LEARN THE LOGIC

... it is not generally emphasized the importance of truth tables as the foundation of the basic rules of elementary logic, because logical operations in the process of formulas transformation are artificial and mechanical. Likewise the use of logical rules in general, seems to be more involved in the c ...
Sequent calculus for predicate logic
Sequent calculus for predicate logic

... cut rule, then we define the cut rank of π to be the rank of any cut formula in π which has greatest possible rank. Lemma 1.2. (Weakening) If Γ ⇒ ∆ is the endsequent of a derivation π and Γ ⊆ Γ0 and ∆ ⊆ ∆0 , then Γ0 ⇒ ∆0 is derivable as well. In fact, the latter has a derivation π 0 with a cut rank ...
Basic Logic - Progetto e
Basic Logic - Progetto e

pdf
pdf

Lecture 39 Notes
Lecture 39 Notes

Slide 1
Slide 1

... is there exist integers p and q with q0 such that r=p/q. A real number that is not rational is called irrational. • Ex.7: Prove that the sum of two rational numbers is rational. • Ex.8: Prove that if n is an integer and n2 is odd, then n is odd. ...
Logic and Proof - Collaboratory for Advanced Computing and
Logic and Proof - Collaboratory for Advanced Computing and

... Methods of Proving Theorems Proving implications p → q: Direct proof: Assume p is T, and use rules of inference to prove that q is T Indirect proof: Prove its contrapositive; assume ¬q, and prove ¬p Proof by cases: Prove (p1 ∨ p2) → q by proving (p1 → q) and (p1 → q) • Based on [(p1 ∨ p2) → q ...
Resources - CSE, IIT Bombay
Resources - CSE, IIT Bombay

... B is result of MP (contd) If it can be shown that A1, A2, A3,… An-1 |- An Ei and A1, A2, A3,… An-1 |- (An (EiB)) ...
Conditional and Indirect Proofs
Conditional and Indirect Proofs

Lecture Notes 2
Lecture Notes 2

... Difference? The amount of explicit detail. ...
chapter 16
chapter 16

CSE 321, Discrete Structures
CSE 321, Discrete Structures

A systematic proof theory for several modal logics
A systematic proof theory for several modal logics

the common rules of binary connectives are finitely based
the common rules of binary connectives are finitely based

... τ (p, q, r, s) = qq 2 (s2 s2 )p3 r3 (qq 2 (s2 s2 )p3 )3 as is shown by straight-forward calculation. Theorem 2. If `1 , . . . , `n are independent and f.b. then `1 ∩ . . . ∩ `n is f.b. Example 2. As is well known, |=→ , |=← , |=↔ , |=↑ are f.b. Since these logics are independent according to the abo ...
PDF
PDF

PDF
PDF

... 1 Intuitionistic Logic and Constructive Mathematics It turns out that there is there is a deep connection between the type systems we have been exploring for the lambda calculus, and proof systems for a variety of logic known as intuitionistic logic. Intuitionistic logic is the basis of constructive ...
< 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 >

Natural deduction

In logic and proof theory, natural deduction is a kind of proof calculus in which logical reasoning is expressed by inference rules closely related to the ""natural"" way of reasoning. This contrasts with the axiomatic systems which instead use axioms as much as possible to express the logical laws of deductive reasoning.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report