proceedings version
... H (‘here’) and T (‘there’) such that H ⊆ T . The logical language to talk about such models has connectives ⊥, ∧, ∨, and ⇒. The latter is interpreted in a non-classical way and is therefore different from the material implication →: H, T |= ϕ ⇒ ψ iff H, T |= ϕ → ψ and T, T |= ϕ → ψ where → is interp ...
... H (‘here’) and T (‘there’) such that H ⊆ T . The logical language to talk about such models has connectives ⊥, ∧, ∨, and ⇒. The latter is interpreted in a non-classical way and is therefore different from the material implication →: H, T |= ϕ ⇒ ψ iff H, T |= ϕ → ψ and T, T |= ϕ → ψ where → is interp ...
Proof Theory: From Arithmetic to Set Theory
... The natural deduction calculus and the sequent calculus were both invented by Gentzen in 1934. Both calculi are pretty illustrations of the symmetries of logic. In this course I shall focus on the sequent calculus since it is a central tool in ordinal analysis and allows for generalizations to infin ...
... The natural deduction calculus and the sequent calculus were both invented by Gentzen in 1934. Both calculi are pretty illustrations of the symmetries of logic. In this course I shall focus on the sequent calculus since it is a central tool in ordinal analysis and allows for generalizations to infin ...
predicate
... • Some people have more than one brother • x y1 y2 ( B(y1,x) B(y2,x) (y1 = y2) ...
... • Some people have more than one brother • x y1 y2 ( B(y1,x) B(y2,x) (y1 = y2) ...
Variations on a Montagovian Theme
... object. The subject is the person who knows or believes; the object is that which is known or believed. But what kind of object is this? Two answers have been popular in the more systematic branches of epistemology and philosophy of mind. The first identifies objects of attitudes with something like ...
... object. The subject is the person who knows or believes; the object is that which is known or believed. But what kind of object is this? Two answers have been popular in the more systematic branches of epistemology and philosophy of mind. The first identifies objects of attitudes with something like ...
Introduction - Charles Ling
... Propositional resolution is a rule of inference. Using propositional resolution alone (without other rules of inference), it is possible to build a theorem prover that is sound and complete for all of Propositional Logic. ...
... Propositional resolution is a rule of inference. Using propositional resolution alone (without other rules of inference), it is possible to build a theorem prover that is sound and complete for all of Propositional Logic. ...
Q - GROU.PS
... propositions. • A proposition is a (declarative) statement that is either true or false (not both). • We say that the truth value of a proposition is either true (T) or false (F). • Corresponds to 1 and 0 in digital circuits Spring 2003 ...
... propositions. • A proposition is a (declarative) statement that is either true or false (not both). • We say that the truth value of a proposition is either true (T) or false (F). • Corresponds to 1 and 0 in digital circuits Spring 2003 ...
many-valued logics - University of Sydney
... case, a tautology is a proposition which gets the value 1 on every model (e.g. p ∨ ¬p, p → p), and a proposition α is a logical consequence of the set of propositions Γ (written Γ |= α) if, on every model on which every proposition in Γ has the value 1, α has the value 1 (e.g. {p, p → q} |= q, {p} | ...
... case, a tautology is a proposition which gets the value 1 on every model (e.g. p ∨ ¬p, p → p), and a proposition α is a logical consequence of the set of propositions Γ (written Γ |= α) if, on every model on which every proposition in Γ has the value 1, α has the value 1 (e.g. {p, p → q} |= q, {p} | ...
Strict Predicativity 3
... theory of finite sets; EFSC adds first-order definable classes. Feferman and Hellman don’t pose the questions in quite the way I have above, so that they don’t clearly claim that EFS and EFSC are strictly predicative. The question whether they are, however, is clearly relevant to our question (1). T ...
... theory of finite sets; EFSC adds first-order definable classes. Feferman and Hellman don’t pose the questions in quite the way I have above, so that they don’t clearly claim that EFS and EFSC are strictly predicative. The question whether they are, however, is clearly relevant to our question (1). T ...
Hilbert Type Deductive System for Sentential Logic, Completeness
... Proof: The following is a proof of α→α α→[(α→α)→α], {α→[(α→α)→ α]}→{[α→(α→α)]→(α→α)], (α→(α→α))→(α→α), α→(α→α), α→α The first wff is an instance of Axiom (i), the second––of Axiom (ii), the third is inferred from the first two via modus ponens, the fourth is an instance of Axiom (i) and the fifth i ...
... Proof: The following is a proof of α→α α→[(α→α)→α], {α→[(α→α)→ α]}→{[α→(α→α)]→(α→α)], (α→(α→α))→(α→α), α→(α→α), α→α The first wff is an instance of Axiom (i), the second––of Axiom (ii), the third is inferred from the first two via modus ponens, the fourth is an instance of Axiom (i) and the fifth i ...
Variables and Quantifiers
... The logic we have been using so far is very limited and cannot describe most of the statements in mathematics and computer science. For example the statement: p: n is an odd integer is neither true nor false, because it depends on the value of n, so it is not a proposition. If a statement truth valu ...
... The logic we have been using so far is very limited and cannot describe most of the statements in mathematics and computer science. For example the statement: p: n is an odd integer is neither true nor false, because it depends on the value of n, so it is not a proposition. If a statement truth valu ...
Logic programming slides
... = {Pa, x Px} has a model but no minimal Herbrand model. The Herbrand universe of is {a}, but no model on this domain satisfies . ' = {Pa Qa} has two minimal Herbrand models: one wherein Pa is true and Qa is false, and one wherein Qa is true and Pa is false. Properties of the minimal i ...
... = {Pa, x Px} has a model but no minimal Herbrand model. The Herbrand universe of is {a}, but no model on this domain satisfies . ' = {Pa Qa} has two minimal Herbrand models: one wherein Pa is true and Qa is false, and one wherein Qa is true and Pa is false. Properties of the minimal i ...
16 - Institute for Logic, Language and Computation
... = {Pa, x Px} has a model but no minimal Herbrand model. The Herbrand universe of is {a}, but no model on this domain satisfies . ' = {Pa Qa} has two minimal Herbrand models: one wherein Pa is true and Qa is false, and one wherein Qa is true and Pa is false. Properties of the minimal i ...
... = {Pa, x Px} has a model but no minimal Herbrand model. The Herbrand universe of is {a}, but no model on this domain satisfies . ' = {Pa Qa} has two minimal Herbrand models: one wherein Pa is true and Qa is false, and one wherein Qa is true and Pa is false. Properties of the minimal i ...
page 3 A CONVERSE BARCAN FORMULA IN ARISTOTLE`S
... Unfortunately for the overall coherence of Aristotle’s modal logic, counterexamples undermine the alleged validity of the convertibility of affirmative apodeictic propositions construed as de re necessary. I L conversion, critics contend (cf. Patterson [10]: 154), is invalid. For instance, assume th ...
... Unfortunately for the overall coherence of Aristotle’s modal logic, counterexamples undermine the alleged validity of the convertibility of affirmative apodeictic propositions construed as de re necessary. I L conversion, critics contend (cf. Patterson [10]: 154), is invalid. For instance, assume th ...