• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Model theory makes formulas large
Model theory makes formulas large

... e ≤ f (||ϕ||), not even on the class of all finite trees. This provides a succinctness lower bound for both the classical Łoś-Tarski theorem and its variants for classes of finite forests and all classes of finite structures that contain all trees (but not for classes of finite structures of bounde ...
Logic: Introduction - Department of information engineering and
Logic: Introduction - Department of information engineering and

... Modern Logic teaches us that one claim is a logical consequence of another if there is no way the latter could be true without the former also being true. It is also used to disconfirm a theory if a particular claim is a logical consequence of a theory, and we discover that the claim is false, then ...
The semantics of propositional logic
The semantics of propositional logic

Early_Term_Test Comments
Early_Term_Test Comments

An Axiomatization of G'3
An Axiomatization of G'3

Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to
Reducing Propositional Theories in Equilibrium Logic to

A Resolution Method for Modal Logic S5
A Resolution Method for Modal Logic S5

... The normal modal logic S5 is among the most studied modal logics. It is well-known that it can be considered as an epistemic logic in the sense that it is suitable for representing and reasoning about the knowledge of an agent [8]. In [12], Ladner proved that the complexity of the satisfiability pro ...
pdf
pdf

... Gödel’s incompleteness theorem is often described as “any consistent and sufficiently strong formal theory of arithmetic is incomplete”, where a formal theory is viewed as one whose theorems are derivable from an axiom system. For such theories there will always be formulas that are true (for insta ...
The strong completeness of the tableau method 1 The strong
The strong completeness of the tableau method 1 The strong

... It is because of this problem that, in order to guarantee the strong completeness of the tableau method, we must begin by adopting in one way or other the idea of Def. 2.1. Or else, we could allow for an extension of the language with a new variable every time that is needed to instantiate a formu ...
To What Type of Logic Does the "Tetralemma" Belong?
To What Type of Logic Does the "Tetralemma" Belong?

... “caused by self” and “caused by another” as mutual negations, and if one interprets its negative phrasing as the denial of all four alternatives. In that case, it would have the same character as the other Nargarjunian examples. However, such an exegesis would only be consistent if one assumed that ...
SP07 cs188 lecture 1..
SP07 cs188 lecture 1..

...  All members of a category can be recognized by some properties   x (Orange(x)  Round(x)  Diameter(x)=9.5in  MemberOf(x,Balls)  MemberOf(x,BasketBalls)) ...
Solutions to Workbook Exercises Unit 16: Categorical Propositions
Solutions to Workbook Exercises Unit 16: Categorical Propositions

PPT
PPT

PPTX
PPTX

... • These are good starting point, because they are simpler than the more free-form proofs we will discuss later • Only a limited number of choices at each step. ...
Module 4: Propositional Logic Proofs
Module 4: Propositional Logic Proofs

... • These are good starting point, because they are simpler than the more free-form proofs we will discuss later • Only a limited number of choices at each step. ...
Natural deduction for predicate logic
Natural deduction for predicate logic

... This suggests that to prove a formula of the form ∀xφ, we can prove φ with some arbitrary but fresh variable x0 substituted for x. That is, we want to prove the formula φ[x0 /x]. On the previous slide, we used n as a fresh variable, but in our formal proofs, we adopt the convention of using subscri ...
A relevance theoretic approach to Gikuyu jokes
A relevance theoretic approach to Gikuyu jokes

Document
Document

Truth, Conservativeness and Provability
Truth, Conservativeness and Provability

... important requirement for deflationary truth theories. It is the deflationist’s intuition that truth is in some sense ‘innocent’ or ‘metaphysically thin’. 1 The truth predicate is just a ‘logical device’ permitting us to formulate useful generalizations (moreover, some of these generalizations will ...
a new cartographic geometry - International Cartographic Association
a new cartographic geometry - International Cartographic Association

Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF
Chapter 1 LOGIC AND PROOF

... connective is an alternative way of defining a connective, since these are defined in terms of the truth value of the resulting compound statement, given the truth value of its components. ...
Beginning Deductive Logic
Beginning Deductive Logic

Chapter 1 Logic and Set Theory
Chapter 1 Logic and Set Theory

... is not a tautology. That is, P → R certainly does not imply (P → Q) ∧ (Q → R). A logical implication that is reversible is called a logical equivalence. More precisely, P is equivalent to Q if the statement P ↔ Q is a tautology. We denote the sentence “P is equivalent to Q” by simply writing “P ⇔ Q. ...
Further Exercises for the tutorials on logic in CS 3511 1. Find a
Further Exercises for the tutorials on logic in CS 3511 1. Find a

... Further Exercises for the tutorials on logic in CS 3511 1. Find a counterexample, if possible, to these statements, where the u.d. consists of all (negative and non-negative) integers: a. ∀x∀y(x2 = y 2 → x = y) Answer: x = 3, y = −3 b. ∀x∃y(y 2 = x) Answer: x = −3; also, x=5 c. ∀x∀y(xy ≥ x) Let x be ...
Identity and Harmony revisited ∗ Stephen Read University of St Andrews
Identity and Harmony revisited ∗ Stephen Read University of St Andrews

< 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 38 >

Interpretation (logic)

An interpretation is an assignment of meaning to the symbols of a formal language. Many formal languages used in mathematics, logic, and theoretical computer science are defined in solely syntactic terms, and as such do not have any meaning until they are given some interpretation. The general study of interpretations of formal languages is called formal semantics.The most commonly studied formal logics are propositional logic, predicate logic and their modal analogs, and for these there are standard ways of presenting an interpretation. In these contexts an interpretation is a function that provides the extension of symbols and strings of symbols of an object language. For example, an interpretation function could take the predicate T (for ""tall"") and assign it the extension {a} (for ""Abraham Lincoln""). Note that all our interpretation does is assign the extension {a} to the non-logical constant T, and does not make a claim about whether T is to stand for tall and 'a' for Abraham Lincoln. Nor does logical interpretation have anything to say about logical connectives like 'and', 'or' and 'not'. Though we may take these symbols to stand for certain things or concepts, this is not determined by the interpretation function.An interpretation often (but not always) provides a way to determine the truth values of sentences in a language. If a given interpretation assigns the value True to a sentence or theory, the interpretation is called a model of that sentence or theory.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report