• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
i Preface
i Preface

Section 2.3: Statements Containing Multiple Quantifiers
Section 2.3: Statements Containing Multiple Quantifiers

Truth Tables and Deductive Reasoning
Truth Tables and Deductive Reasoning

CS173: Discrete Math
CS173: Discrete Math

... • P  q: “You can take the flight if and only if you buy a ticket” – This statement is true • If you buy a ticket and take the flight • If you do not buy a ticket and you cannot take the flight ...
Functional programming and NLP
Functional programming and NLP

... what’s the issue with functions? It is possible to define functions in an imperative language like C. The main difference is that in a real functional language, the functions are first-class objects, which means that they can be given as arguments to other functions, and be returned as results. 1 As ...
Exercise
Exercise

... P(x) it is not enough to show that P(a) is true for one or some a’s. 2. To show that a statement of the form x P(x) is FALSE, it is enough to show that P(a) is false for one a ...
predicators
predicators

Logic is to language and meaning as mathematics is to physical
Logic is to language and meaning as mathematics is to physical

Semi-constr. theories - Stanford Mathematics
Semi-constr. theories - Stanford Mathematics

8.1 Symbols and Translation
8.1 Symbols and Translation

... If Rx means “x is a rabbit,” and Sx means “x is a snake,” then the premise translates as, “If everything in the universe is a rabbit, everything in the universe is snake.” ◦ The statement is true because the antecedent is false: not everything in the universe is a rabbit. However, the conclusion is ...
Section 1
Section 1

... Contrapositives, converses, and inverses Definition Consider the implication p  q 1. The converse of the implication is 2. The inverse of the implication is 3. The contrapositive of the implication is Proposition 3 1. An implication and its contrapositive are logically equivalent 2. The converse a ...
PDF
PDF

(pdf)
(pdf)

p-3 q. = .pq = p,
p-3 q. = .pq = p,

An Independence Result For Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic
An Independence Result For Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic

... in [M1] to show that certain apparently stronger extensions of S12 are actually stronger assuming the above mentioned complexity assumption. Here, we strengthen the first independence result mentioned above by showing that the sentence ¬¬∀x, y∃z ≤ y(x ≤ |y| → x = |z|) is not provable in the intuitio ...
Resolution Algorithm
Resolution Algorithm

... • Entailment means that one thing follows from another: KB ╞ α • Knowledge base KB entails sentence α if and only if α is true in all worlds where KB is true – E.g., the KB containing “the Giants won” and “the Reds won” entails “Either the Giants won or the Reds won” – E.g., x+y = 4 entails 4 = x+y ...
A Simple Exposition of Gödel`s Theorem
A Simple Exposition of Gödel`s Theorem

... numbers which was very strange. I suppose I had been trying to formulate my argument against materialism. Nine years later I was able to go to Princeton to study mathematical logic properly, and on my return tried out my argument on colleagues at Cambridge, then in a paper in 1959 to the Oxford Phil ...
Comparing Constructive Arithmetical Theories Based - Math
Comparing Constructive Arithmetical Theories Based - Math

... (term) a, and also consider the formula ∀z 6 a(x + z = |a| → ∀y 6 t¬A(z, y)) as B(x). To prove P V + ¬¬N P − LIN D `i P V + coN P − LIN D, make similar changes. (iii) This is an immediate consequence of Proposition 2.2 and part (ii).  Recall that the theory CP V is the classical closure of IP V an ...
com.1 The Compactness Theorem
com.1 The Compactness Theorem

... Problem com.2. In the standard model of arithmetic N, there is no element k ∈ |N| which satisfies every formula n < x (where n is 0...0 with n 0’s). Use the compactness theorem to show that the set of sentences in the language of arithmetic which are true in the standard model of arithmetic N are a ...
PDF
PDF

... 3. A set S of formulas is called decidable if the set of Gödel numbers of S is decidable, i.e. if the characteristic function of that set is computable. 4. T is called axiomatizable, if there is a decidable subset of T whose logical consequences are exactly the theorems of T . T is finitely axiomat ...
Second-Order Logic and Fagin`s Theorem
Second-Order Logic and Fagin`s Theorem

... CHAPTER 7. SECOND-ORDER LOGIC AND FAGIN’S THEOREM The converse of Lynch’s Theorem is an open question: ...
Logic - Mathematical Institute SANU
Logic - Mathematical Institute SANU

... connectives and, or, if, if and only if and not, which are studied in propositional logic, and the quantifier expressions for every and for some, and identity (i.e. the relational expression equals), which, together with the connectives, are studied in predicate logic. If logic is indeed the theory ...
A Textbook of Discrete Mathematics
A Textbook of Discrete Mathematics

Lindenbaum lemma for infinitary logics
Lindenbaum lemma for infinitary logics

... We use the existing disjunction connective to combine and ‘remember’ these special formulas. The resulting theory does not prove any of those special formulas and thus is of a ‘finitary’ nature. Then, with a bit more of work, the theorem follows. One may object that the new lemma gives less informat ...
Sentence (linguistics)
Sentence (linguistics)

... From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to:navigation, search In the field of linguistics, a sentence is an expression in natural language, often defined to indicate a grammatical and lexical unit consisting of one or more words that represent distinct concepts. A sentence can include words group ...
< 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 38 >

Interpretation (logic)

An interpretation is an assignment of meaning to the symbols of a formal language. Many formal languages used in mathematics, logic, and theoretical computer science are defined in solely syntactic terms, and as such do not have any meaning until they are given some interpretation. The general study of interpretations of formal languages is called formal semantics.The most commonly studied formal logics are propositional logic, predicate logic and their modal analogs, and for these there are standard ways of presenting an interpretation. In these contexts an interpretation is a function that provides the extension of symbols and strings of symbols of an object language. For example, an interpretation function could take the predicate T (for ""tall"") and assign it the extension {a} (for ""Abraham Lincoln""). Note that all our interpretation does is assign the extension {a} to the non-logical constant T, and does not make a claim about whether T is to stand for tall and 'a' for Abraham Lincoln. Nor does logical interpretation have anything to say about logical connectives like 'and', 'or' and 'not'. Though we may take these symbols to stand for certain things or concepts, this is not determined by the interpretation function.An interpretation often (but not always) provides a way to determine the truth values of sentences in a language. If a given interpretation assigns the value True to a sentence or theory, the interpretation is called a model of that sentence or theory.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report