- Free Documents
... Some consequences are studied of Shavrukovs theorem regarding the Magari algebras diagonalizable algebras that are embeddable in the Magari algebra of formal arithmetical theories. Semantic characterizations of faithfully interpretable modal propositional theories in a nite number of propositional l ...
... Some consequences are studied of Shavrukovs theorem regarding the Magari algebras diagonalizable algebras that are embeddable in the Magari algebra of formal arithmetical theories. Semantic characterizations of faithfully interpretable modal propositional theories in a nite number of propositional l ...
Everything is Knowable - Computer Science Intranet
... We model your uncertainty, for which a single epistemic modality suffices. Initially, there are two possible worlds, one in which p is true and another one in which p is false, and that you cannot distinguish from one another. Although in fact p is true, you don’t know that: p ∧ ¬Kp. In this logic, ...
... We model your uncertainty, for which a single epistemic modality suffices. Initially, there are two possible worlds, one in which p is true and another one in which p is false, and that you cannot distinguish from one another. Although in fact p is true, you don’t know that: p ∧ ¬Kp. In this logic, ...
First-Order Logic with Dependent Types
... for the sort S. o is the type of formulas. The remainder of the signature encodes the usual grammar for FOL formulas. Higher-order abstract syntax is used, i.e., λ is used to bind the free variables in a formula, and quantifiers are operators taking a λ expression as an argument.2 Quantifiers and th ...
... for the sort S. o is the type of formulas. The remainder of the signature encodes the usual grammar for FOL formulas. Higher-order abstract syntax is used, i.e., λ is used to bind the free variables in a formula, and quantifiers are operators taking a λ expression as an argument.2 Quantifiers and th ...
Epsilon Substitution for Transfinite Induction
... T RU E. On the other hand, if |xφ(x)|S then, since obviously 0 t ,→S T RU E then we have φ(0) ,→S T RU E. In either case, CrI ,→S T RU E, so I 6= I(S). In the second case, if vIS = 0 then |s|S = S0, and therefore, by correctness, |xs = Sx|S = 0, so s = S(xs = Sx) ,→S T RU E. Again, CrI ,→S T RU ...
... T RU E. On the other hand, if |xφ(x)|S then, since obviously 0 t ,→S T RU E then we have φ(0) ,→S T RU E. In either case, CrI ,→S T RU E, so I 6= I(S). In the second case, if vIS = 0 then |s|S = S0, and therefore, by correctness, |xs = Sx|S = 0, so s = S(xs = Sx) ,→S T RU E. Again, CrI ,→S T RU ...
Chapter 1 Logic
... Formally, two statements s1 and s2 are logically equivalent if s1 ↔ s2 is a tautology. We use the notation s1 ⇔ s2 to denote the fact (theorem) that s1 ↔ s2 is a tautology, that is, that s1 and s2 are logically equivalent. Notice that s1 ↔ s2 is a statement and can in general be true or false, and s ...
... Formally, two statements s1 and s2 are logically equivalent if s1 ↔ s2 is a tautology. We use the notation s1 ⇔ s2 to denote the fact (theorem) that s1 ↔ s2 is a tautology, that is, that s1 and s2 are logically equivalent. Notice that s1 ↔ s2 is a statement and can in general be true or false, and s ...