
Chapter 9 Mathematics of Cryptography
... The floor of 97 = 9. The primes less than 9 are 2, 3, 5, and 7. We need to see if 97 is divisible by any of these numbers. It is not, so 97 is a prime. Example 9.6 Is 301 a prime? Solution The floor of 301 = 17. We need to check 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, and 17. The numbers 2, 3, and 5 do not divide 301 ...
... The floor of 97 = 9. The primes less than 9 are 2, 3, 5, and 7. We need to see if 97 is divisible by any of these numbers. It is not, so 97 is a prime. Example 9.6 Is 301 a prime? Solution The floor of 301 = 17. We need to check 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, and 17. The numbers 2, 3, and 5 do not divide 301 ...
De Moivre`s Theorem 10
... We have seen, in Section 10.2 Key Point 7, that, in polar form, if z = r(cos θ + i sin θ) and w = t(cos φ + i sin φ) then the product zw is: zw = rt(cos(θ + φ) + i sin(θ + φ)) In particular, if r = 1, t = 1 and θ = φ (i.e. z = w = cos θ + i sin θ), we obtain (cos θ + i sin θ)2 = cos 2θ + i sin 2θ Mu ...
... We have seen, in Section 10.2 Key Point 7, that, in polar form, if z = r(cos θ + i sin θ) and w = t(cos φ + i sin φ) then the product zw is: zw = rt(cos(θ + φ) + i sin(θ + φ)) In particular, if r = 1, t = 1 and θ = φ (i.e. z = w = cos θ + i sin θ), we obtain (cos θ + i sin θ)2 = cos 2θ + i sin 2θ Mu ...
UNIT 11.4: Pascal`s Triangle
... hhhtt, hhtht, hhtth, hthht, hthth, htthh, thhht, thhth, ththh, tthhh hhhht, hhhth, hhthh, hthhh, thhhh hhhhh ...
... hhhtt, hhtht, hhtth, hthht, hthth, htthh, thhht, thhth, ththh, tthhh hhhht, hhhth, hhthh, hthhh, thhhh hhhhh ...
Chapter 3: Elementary Number Theory And Methods of Proof
... symbols only since the proof becomes difficult to follow. A readable proof balances the use of the plain language and mathematical symbols well. Justify each step in your proof by either appealing to a hypothesis, definition, or whatever else you are allowed to use. This also helps you catch errors ...
... symbols only since the proof becomes difficult to follow. A readable proof balances the use of the plain language and mathematical symbols well. Justify each step in your proof by either appealing to a hypothesis, definition, or whatever else you are allowed to use. This also helps you catch errors ...
Math 784: algebraic NUMBER THEORY
... and v2 (x) to be rational numbers times u1 (x) and v1 (x), respectively. Proof. Let d denote the content of f (x). Then there are positive rational integers a and b and primitive polynomials u(x) and v(x) in Z[x] with deg u(x) = deg u1 (x) and deg v(x) = deg v1 (x) satisfying u1 (x)v1 (x) = (a/b)u(x ...
... and v2 (x) to be rational numbers times u1 (x) and v1 (x), respectively. Proof. Let d denote the content of f (x). Then there are positive rational integers a and b and primitive polynomials u(x) and v(x) in Z[x] with deg u(x) = deg u1 (x) and deg v(x) = deg v1 (x) satisfying u1 (x)v1 (x) = (a/b)u(x ...
Square Roots Modulo p
... University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA, [email protected] ...
... University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA, [email protected] ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.