
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL GENUS
... For example, −11 = 4 · 3 · (−1) + 12 , and −11 = 12 − 3 · 22 . Similarly, −2 = 4 · 3 · (−2) + 52 − 3 and −2 = 12 − 3 · 12 . Euler’s main motivation for this conjecture were numerical data, but he also had a proof that p = x2 − ay 2 implies p = 4an + r2 or p = 4an + r2 − a. In fact, he writes x = 2at ...
... For example, −11 = 4 · 3 · (−1) + 12 , and −11 = 12 − 3 · 22 . Similarly, −2 = 4 · 3 · (−2) + 52 − 3 and −2 = 12 − 3 · 12 . Euler’s main motivation for this conjecture were numerical data, but he also had a proof that p = x2 − ay 2 implies p = 4an + r2 or p = 4an + r2 − a. In fact, he writes x = 2at ...
Sequences and Limit of Sequences
... Like a function, a sequence can be plotted. However, since the domain is a subset of Z, the plot will consist of dots instead of a continuous curve. Since a sequence is de…ned as a function. everything we de…ned for functions (bounds, supremum, in…mum, ...) also applies to sequences. We restate thos ...
... Like a function, a sequence can be plotted. However, since the domain is a subset of Z, the plot will consist of dots instead of a continuous curve. Since a sequence is de…ned as a function. everything we de…ned for functions (bounds, supremum, in…mum, ...) also applies to sequences. We restate thos ...
In this lecture we will start with Number Theory. We will start
... (a) n1 has no prime divisors, particularly, n1 itself cannot be prime so n1 = ab where a > 1 and b > 1 (b) All natural numbers smaller than n1 has prime divisors But the two numbers a, b must both be smaller than n1 , this means that they must both have prime divisors, since n1 was the smallest numb ...
... (a) n1 has no prime divisors, particularly, n1 itself cannot be prime so n1 = ab where a > 1 and b > 1 (b) All natural numbers smaller than n1 has prime divisors But the two numbers a, b must both be smaller than n1 , this means that they must both have prime divisors, since n1 was the smallest numb ...
FERMAT`S LITTLE THEOREM 1. Introduction When we compute the
... This suggests the potential of proving a number m ≥ 2 is composite without having to factor it: just find a single a ≡ 6 0 mod m for which am−1 6≡ 1 mod m. Example 3.1. Let m = 48703. Since 2m−1 ≡ 11646 6≡ 1 mod m, the number 48703 must be composite. We know that without having any idea of how to fa ...
... This suggests the potential of proving a number m ≥ 2 is composite without having to factor it: just find a single a ≡ 6 0 mod m for which am−1 6≡ 1 mod m. Example 3.1. Let m = 48703. Since 2m−1 ≡ 11646 6≡ 1 mod m, the number 48703 must be composite. We know that without having any idea of how to fa ...
Geometry 2014 – 2015 Midterm Review
... • Two column proofs: Two columns are constructed with statements on the left and reasons on the right. For every step, a postulate or theorem must be given to justify the step. • Statements and reasons: Statements are the “work” side. Reasons are the postulate or theorem permitting such a step. ...
... • Two column proofs: Two columns are constructed with statements on the left and reasons on the right. For every step, a postulate or theorem must be given to justify the step. • Statements and reasons: Statements are the “work” side. Reasons are the postulate or theorem permitting such a step. ...
An Introduction to Prime Numbers
... Before the 18-th. century, the only way that was known to test if a given number was a prime or not was the ‘method of Eratosthenes.’ (E., an early Greek mathematician, is credited with being the first person who made a serious attempt at calculating the circumference of the Earth. He is said to hav ...
... Before the 18-th. century, the only way that was known to test if a given number was a prime or not was the ‘method of Eratosthenes.’ (E., an early Greek mathematician, is credited with being the first person who made a serious attempt at calculating the circumference of the Earth. He is said to hav ...
Specifying and Verifying Fault-Tolerant Systems
... the earlier syntax for the same operator, (iii) single square brackets have replaced ...
... the earlier syntax for the same operator, (iii) single square brackets have replaced ...
DOC - Rose
... natural numbers. The simplest and most familiar is base 10, which is used in everyday life. A less common way to represent a number is the so called Cantor expansion. Often presented as exercises in discrete math and computer science courses [8.2, 8.5], this system uses factorials rather than expone ...
... natural numbers. The simplest and most familiar is base 10, which is used in everyday life. A less common way to represent a number is the so called Cantor expansion. Often presented as exercises in discrete math and computer science courses [8.2, 8.5], this system uses factorials rather than expone ...
www.fq.math.ca
... Among all polygonal chains, the hexagonal chains were studied the most extensively, since they are of great importance in chemistry, namely, benzenoid hydrocarbon chains. Each perfect matching of a hexagonal chain corresponds to a Kekule structure of the corresponding benzenoid hydrocarbon. The stab ...
... Among all polygonal chains, the hexagonal chains were studied the most extensively, since they are of great importance in chemistry, namely, benzenoid hydrocarbon chains. Each perfect matching of a hexagonal chain corresponds to a Kekule structure of the corresponding benzenoid hydrocarbon. The stab ...
lecture notes on mathematical induction
... the smallest prime which is not known to appear in the Euclid-Mullin sequence is 31. Remark: Some scholars have suggested that what is essentially an argument by mathematical induction appears in the later middle Platonic dialogue Parmenides, lines 149a7-c3. But this argument is of mostly historical ...
... the smallest prime which is not known to appear in the Euclid-Mullin sequence is 31. Remark: Some scholars have suggested that what is essentially an argument by mathematical induction appears in the later middle Platonic dialogue Parmenides, lines 149a7-c3. But this argument is of mostly historical ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.