
Congruent Number Problem 1 Congruent number problem
... We always start with a primitive ∆1 (with sides length a1 , b1 , c1 ) whose area is a square and construct a new primitive ∆2 (with sides length a2 , b2 , c2 ) whose area is again a square and Key Point: always c2 < c1 . ( In fact, we shall show that c42 < c1 .) Repeating the argument, we construct ...
... We always start with a primitive ∆1 (with sides length a1 , b1 , c1 ) whose area is a square and construct a new primitive ∆2 (with sides length a2 , b2 , c2 ) whose area is again a square and Key Point: always c2 < c1 . ( In fact, we shall show that c42 < c1 .) Repeating the argument, we construct ...
CS 2742 (Logic in Computer Science) Lecture 6
... by cases, by contradiction, by transitivity and so on. They can be derived from the original logic identities. For example, modus ponens becomes ((p → q) ∧ p) → q. ...
... by cases, by contradiction, by transitivity and so on. They can be derived from the original logic identities. For example, modus ponens becomes ((p → q) ∧ p) → q. ...
proof - Jim Hogan
... Inspiration from Dr. Paul Brown, Carmel School, WA Paul presented a similar workshop at MAV Conference, 2008. I enjoyed the session so much I decided then to present my version here in Palmerston North. Thanks also to a little book called Q.E.D. Beauty in Mathematical Proof written by Burkard Polste ...
... Inspiration from Dr. Paul Brown, Carmel School, WA Paul presented a similar workshop at MAV Conference, 2008. I enjoyed the session so much I decided then to present my version here in Palmerston North. Thanks also to a little book called Q.E.D. Beauty in Mathematical Proof written by Burkard Polste ...
Section 1
... Axioms: Statements that are always true. • Example: Given two distinct points, there is exactly one line that contains them. ...
... Axioms: Statements that are always true. • Example: Given two distinct points, there is exactly one line that contains them. ...
Chapter 1 Logic and Set Theory
... A logical implication that is reversible is called a logical equivalence. More precisely, P is equivalent to Q if the statement P ↔ Q is a tautology. We denote the sentence “P is equivalent to Q” by simply writing “P ⇔ Q.” The meta-statement P ⇔ Q holds if and only if P ⇒ Q and Q ⇒ P are both true. ...
... A logical implication that is reversible is called a logical equivalence. More precisely, P is equivalent to Q if the statement P ↔ Q is a tautology. We denote the sentence “P is equivalent to Q” by simply writing “P ⇔ Q.” The meta-statement P ⇔ Q holds if and only if P ⇒ Q and Q ⇒ P are both true. ...
3 Binomial Theorem
... If you had to expand (x − 3y) 2 , then simple FOIL. But something like (2x − 4) 12 , would take a very long time to expand. There are two methods that may be used to accomplish this task. One of them is called Pascal’s triangle but is only used if the exponent is less than 9. The other method is con ...
... If you had to expand (x − 3y) 2 , then simple FOIL. But something like (2x − 4) 12 , would take a very long time to expand. There are two methods that may be used to accomplish this task. One of them is called Pascal’s triangle but is only used if the exponent is less than 9. The other method is con ...
HOMEWORK 2 1. P63, Ex. 1 Proof. We prove it by contradiction
... That Q[ p] is an order field follows from the fact that the real numbers R ...
... That Q[ p] is an order field follows from the fact that the real numbers R ...
1. Introduction A fundamental problem in statistical and solid
... yet covered side of the central hexagon (see Figure 3, right picture). This preserves µ = 0 and χ = 1, and does not change the perimeter, and hence, by (1.4), yields another minimizer. When k ≥ 3, we can instead move the first new side of the canonical minimizer obtained by covering the central hexa ...
... yet covered side of the central hexagon (see Figure 3, right picture). This preserves µ = 0 and χ = 1, and does not change the perimeter, and hence, by (1.4), yields another minimizer. When k ≥ 3, we can instead move the first new side of the canonical minimizer obtained by covering the central hexa ...
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
... The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic states that if n > 1 is a positive integer, then n can be written as a product of primes in only one way, apart from the order of the factors. Recall that an integer n is said to be a prime if and only if n > 1 and the only positive divisors of n are 1 and n. In ...
... The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic states that if n > 1 is a positive integer, then n can be written as a product of primes in only one way, apart from the order of the factors. Recall that an integer n is said to be a prime if and only if n > 1 and the only positive divisors of n are 1 and n. In ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.