• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Round Robin Scheduling - A Survey
Round Robin Scheduling - A Survey

The Collatz Conjecture - HAL
The Collatz Conjecture - HAL

Linear Programming
Linear Programming

GA-FreeCell: Evolving Solvers for the Game of FreeCell
GA-FreeCell: Evolving Solvers for the Game of FreeCell

An Efficient Algorithm for Finding Similar Short Substrings from
An Efficient Algorithm for Finding Similar Short Substrings from

3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4. 3-1. 1. Let c = ∑ i ai, then ∀n > 0, p(n)
3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 3-4. 3-1. 1. Let c = ∑ i ai, then ∀n > 0, p(n)

Introduction to AI, Basic Search Methods
Introduction to AI, Basic Search Methods

Quadratic optimization over a second-order cone with linear equality
Quadratic optimization over a second-order cone with linear equality

nature of metacognition in a dynamic geometry
nature of metacognition in a dynamic geometry

A Bucket Elimination Approach for Determining Strong
A Bucket Elimination Approach for Determining Strong

How to Encrypt with the LPN Problem
How to Encrypt with the LPN Problem

Analysis of Insertion Sort
Analysis of Insertion Sort

Convex Optimization Overview
Convex Optimization Overview

... constraints come from prior knowledge about x ...
the simultaneous optimization of building fabric
the simultaneous optimization of building fabric

Here
Here

Unit 1 Notes
Unit 1 Notes

Document
Document

Guided Local Search Joins the Elite in Discrete Optimisation 1
Guided Local Search Joins the Elite in Discrete Optimisation 1

SOLUTION FOR HOMEWORK 3, STAT 4352 Welcome to your third
SOLUTION FOR HOMEWORK 3, STAT 4352 Welcome to your third

... Now I explain you what smart Bayesian statisticians do. They do not calculate f X (x) or try to simplify (2); instead they look at (1) as a density in λ and try to guess what family it is from. Here it is plain to realize that the posterior pdf is again Gamma, more exactly it is Gamma(α + x, β/(1 + ...
A polynomial time algorithm for Rayleigh ratio on
A polynomial time algorithm for Rayleigh ratio on

Chapter 2: Using Objects
Chapter 2: Using Objects

CLASSICAL RESULTS VIA MANN–ISHIKAWA ITERATION
CLASSICAL RESULTS VIA MANN–ISHIKAWA ITERATION

HJ2614551459
HJ2614551459

Paper ~ Which Algorithm Should I Choose At Any Point of the
Paper ~ Which Algorithm Should I Choose At Any Point of the

Problem 1. The windows on an old tram look like shown in the
Problem 1. The windows on an old tram look like shown in the

< 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 53 >

Computational complexity theory



Computational complexity theory is a branch of the theory of computation in theoretical computer science and mathematics that focuses on classifying computational problems according to their inherent difficulty, and relating those classes to each other. A computational problem is understood to be a task that is in principle amenable to being solved by a computer, which is equivalent to stating that the problem may be solved by mechanical application of mathematical steps, such as an algorithm.A problem is regarded as inherently difficult if its solution requires significant resources, whatever the algorithm used. The theory formalizes this intuition, by introducing mathematical models of computation to study these problems and quantifying the amount of resources needed to solve them, such as time and storage. Other complexity measures are also used, such as the amount of communication (used in communication complexity), the number of gates in a circuit (used in circuit complexity) and the number of processors (used in parallel computing). One of the roles of computational complexity theory is to determine the practical limits on what computers can and cannot do.Closely related fields in theoretical computer science are analysis of algorithms and computability theory. A key distinction between analysis of algorithms and computational complexity theory is that the former is devoted to analyzing the amount of resources needed by a particular algorithm to solve a problem, whereas the latter asks a more general question about all possible algorithms that could be used to solve the same problem. More precisely, it tries to classify problems that can or cannot be solved with appropriately restricted resources. In turn, imposing restrictions on the available resources is what distinguishes computational complexity from computability theory: the latter theory asks what kind of problems can, in principle, be solved algorithmically.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report