• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Solving the 0-1 Knapsack Problem with Genetic Algorithms
Solving the 0-1 Knapsack Problem with Genetic Algorithms

parallel multilevel preconditioners
parallel multilevel preconditioners

... multilevel preconditioner in terms of a number of a priori assumptions. In the above example, this theory can be used to show that the relevant condition number is at worst 0(J ). Moreover, these results hold for problems in two, three, and higher dimensions as well as problems with only locally qua ...
1986 - The FERMI System: Inducing Iterative
1986 - The FERMI System: Inducing Iterative

Problem 1. If we increase the length of each edge of a cube by 100
Problem 1. If we increase the length of each edge of a cube by 100

Lecture 9: Numerical solution of boundary value problems
Lecture 9: Numerical solution of boundary value problems

Set point control in the state space setting
Set point control in the state space setting

Ans_Wayne
Ans_Wayne

wang97geneticbased.pdf
wang97geneticbased.pdf

Propositional Logic Proof
Propositional Logic Proof

... Tasting Powerful Proof: Some Things We Might Prove • We can build a “three-way switch” system with any number of switches.  • We can build a combinational circuit matching any truth table.  • We can build any digital logic circuit using nothing but NAND gates. • We can sort a list by breaking it ...
Developing the Fraction Concept
Developing the Fraction Concept

Command Technologies HF2500 Amplifier – Issue with Festoon Bulbs
Command Technologies HF2500 Amplifier – Issue with Festoon Bulbs

Solutions
Solutions

gcd( 0,6)
gcd( 0,6)

Two Pathways to Multiplicative Thinking
Two Pathways to Multiplicative Thinking

Optimal Resource Allocation for MIMO Ad Hoc Cognitive Radio
Optimal Resource Allocation for MIMO Ad Hoc Cognitive Radio

AS Core tasks
AS Core tasks

... The third question can be used to demonstrate an example of a cubic with a repeated root. Problem solution: x³ + 4x² – 3x – 18 = (x – 2)(x + 3)² Task 5: Functions – Transformations If students have met trigonometric functions then these work well for this task. For the problem students should expand ...
A min max problem
A min max problem

Full text
Full text

Regular polygons - TTU Math Department
Regular polygons - TTU Math Department

Spatio-Temporal Reasoning and Context Awareness
Spatio-Temporal Reasoning and Context Awareness

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Maximum Constraint Satisfaction Problems Moses Charikar Konstantin Makarychev
Near-Optimal Algorithms for Maximum Constraint Satisfaction Problems Moses Charikar Konstantin Makarychev

Counting Inversions, Offline Orthogonal Range Counting, and Related Problems Timothy M. Chan
Counting Inversions, Offline Orthogonal Range Counting, and Related Problems Timothy M. Chan

Chapter 6 Problem Set
Chapter 6 Problem Set

MILP approach to the AXXOM case study
MILP approach to the AXXOM case study

Engage NY Module 1 - Mrs. Neubecker's 5th Grade
Engage NY Module 1 - Mrs. Neubecker's 5th Grade

< 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 53 >

Computational complexity theory



Computational complexity theory is a branch of the theory of computation in theoretical computer science and mathematics that focuses on classifying computational problems according to their inherent difficulty, and relating those classes to each other. A computational problem is understood to be a task that is in principle amenable to being solved by a computer, which is equivalent to stating that the problem may be solved by mechanical application of mathematical steps, such as an algorithm.A problem is regarded as inherently difficult if its solution requires significant resources, whatever the algorithm used. The theory formalizes this intuition, by introducing mathematical models of computation to study these problems and quantifying the amount of resources needed to solve them, such as time and storage. Other complexity measures are also used, such as the amount of communication (used in communication complexity), the number of gates in a circuit (used in circuit complexity) and the number of processors (used in parallel computing). One of the roles of computational complexity theory is to determine the practical limits on what computers can and cannot do.Closely related fields in theoretical computer science are analysis of algorithms and computability theory. A key distinction between analysis of algorithms and computational complexity theory is that the former is devoted to analyzing the amount of resources needed by a particular algorithm to solve a problem, whereas the latter asks a more general question about all possible algorithms that could be used to solve the same problem. More precisely, it tries to classify problems that can or cannot be solved with appropriately restricted resources. In turn, imposing restrictions on the available resources is what distinguishes computational complexity from computability theory: the latter theory asks what kind of problems can, in principle, be solved algorithmically.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report