Groupoid Quantales: a non étale setting
... the definition above are not required to be continuous, as is the case e.g. in [10, 13]. This design choice can be motivated as follows. First, there exists at least a topology on G1 w.r.t. which the local bisections of Definition 3.1 are always continuous, and it is defined as follows: Let R ⊆ G0 × ...
... the definition above are not required to be continuous, as is the case e.g. in [10, 13]. This design choice can be motivated as follows. First, there exists at least a topology on G1 w.r.t. which the local bisections of Definition 3.1 are always continuous, and it is defined as follows: Let R ⊆ G0 × ...
Equivariant rigidity of Menger compacta and the Hilbert
... [16]. There is also a proof for Hölder actions given by Maleshich [15]. Recently, Pardon showed that Conjecture 2 is true for three-manifolds [24]. In the survey [7] Dranishnikov gives an account of various partial results and reduces a weaker version of the conjecture to two other problems. In its ...
... [16]. There is also a proof for Hölder actions given by Maleshich [15]. Recently, Pardon showed that Conjecture 2 is true for three-manifolds [24]. In the survey [7] Dranishnikov gives an account of various partial results and reduces a weaker version of the conjecture to two other problems. In its ...
SINGULARITIES ON COMPLETE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES 1
... Remark 2.2. The proof of lemma 2.1 also works for a pair (X, D), where X is an arbitrary affine variety of dimension n and D is a divisor of X. In this case, the result would be that there is a finite map f : X → Cn such that the ramification divisor of f and f (D) are a set sections of a projection ...
... Remark 2.2. The proof of lemma 2.1 also works for a pair (X, D), where X is an arbitrary affine variety of dimension n and D is a divisor of X. In this case, the result would be that there is a finite map f : X → Cn such that the ramification divisor of f and f (D) are a set sections of a projection ...
