• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
On function field Mordell-Lang: the semiabelian case and the
On function field Mordell-Lang: the semiabelian case and the

SPRINGER’S REGULAR ELEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS
SPRINGER’S REGULAR ELEMENTS OVER ARBITRARY FIELDS

... hyperplanes H̄ := H ⊗k k̄ for reflections in G, that is, if v is not fixed by any reflection in G. Define c in G to be regular if it has a regular eigenvector v ∈ V , say with eigenvalue ζ ∈ k̄ × . It will be seen below (Corollary 7) that this implies c is also p-regular, that is, its multiplicative ...
Quotient Rings of Noncommutative Rings in the First Half of the 20th
Quotient Rings of Noncommutative Rings in the First Half of the 20th

modularity of elliptic curves
modularity of elliptic curves

... It is easy to show that an elliptic curve with equation y2 = x3 + ax2 + bx + c has singularities if and only if f(x) = x3 + ax2 + bx + c has multiple roots, which is the same thing as saying that the discriminant of f is 0. Since only finitely many primes can divide the discriminant, there are only ...
Derived Representation Theory and the Algebraic K
Derived Representation Theory and the Algebraic K

... Quillen’s higher algebraic K-theory for fields F has been the object of intense study since their introduction in 1972 [26]. The main direction of research has been the construction of “descent spectral sequences” whose E2 -term involved the cohomology of the absolute Galois group GF with coefficien ...
MATH20212: Algebraic Structures 2
MATH20212: Algebraic Structures 2

Chapter 6. Integral Theorems
Chapter 6. Integral Theorems

The Multivariate Resultant is NP-hard in any Characteristic
The Multivariate Resultant is NP-hard in any Characteristic

STRUCTURE THEOREMS OVER POLYNOMIAL RINGS 1
STRUCTURE THEOREMS OVER POLYNOMIAL RINGS 1

STRONGLY PRIME ALGEBRAIC LIE PI-ALGEBRAS
STRONGLY PRIME ALGEBRAIC LIE PI-ALGEBRAS

PDF
PDF

... In an algebra A there is in fact two binary operations on the set A in question. Thus the abstract definition of the centralizer is ambiguous. However, the additive operation of rings and algebras is always commutative and so any centralizer with respect to this operation is the entire set A. Thus i ...
*These are notes + solutions to herstein problems(second edition
*These are notes + solutions to herstein problems(second edition

... So (aiH ∩ bjK)= (aH ∩ aK) Claim: (aH ∩ aK) is contained a(H ∩ K) Let b be in (aH ∩ aK) => b = ah = ak => h =k and belongs to (H ∩ K) => b is in a(H ∩ K) So as the former is finite in no. so will the latter be some trivial stuff – so just convert to definitions Following are some subgroups Normalizer ...
- Acharyakulam
- Acharyakulam

Ring Theory
Ring Theory

PPT
PPT

Finite fields Michel Waldschmidt Contents
Finite fields Michel Waldschmidt Contents

Rationality of the quotient of P2 by finite group of automorphisms
Rationality of the quotient of P2 by finite group of automorphisms

... we consider the quotient P2k /N. Next, we G/N-equivariantly resolve the singularities of P2k /N, run the G/N-equivariant minimal model program [13] and get a surface X . Then we apply the same procedure to the surface X and the group G/N. This method does not work if the group G is cyclic of prime o ...
On derivatives of polynomials over finite fields through integration
On derivatives of polynomials over finite fields through integration

... be represented as f (x) = i=0 ai xi but the coefficients ai must satisfy certain conditions, see Section 2. In [10], the properties of the set of differential functions defined as DF q = {Da F (x) : F (x) ∈ Fq [x], a ∈ F∗q } was investigated. One should notice that there exist polynomials in Fq [x] ...
2nd 6 Weeks Mathematics 4th Grade
2nd 6 Weeks Mathematics 4th Grade

... 4.4A Model factors and products using arrays and area models. 4.4B Represent multiplication and division situations in picture, word, and number form. 4.4C Recall and apply multiplication facts through 12 x 12. 4.6A Use patterns and relationships to develop strategies to remember basic multiplicatio ...
Algebras over a field
Algebras over a field

1. Divisors Let X be a complete non-singular curve. Definition 1.1. A
1. Divisors Let X be a complete non-singular curve. Definition 1.1. A

Part I: Groups and Subgroups
Part I: Groups and Subgroups

... 2. Given x ∈ G there is exactly one element x′ such that x ∗ x′ = x′ ∗ x = e. This (unique) x′ is called the inverse of x. Proof. By definition of group, G has an identity e ∈ G such that x ∗ e = e ∗ x = x for all x ∈ G. The uniqueness follows from the uniqueness of identity for binary structures. ...
Universal unramified cohomology of cubic fourfolds containing a plane
Universal unramified cohomology of cubic fourfolds containing a plane

Algebraic Number Theory, a Computational Approach
Algebraic Number Theory, a Computational Approach

... We will prove the theorem as follows. We first remark that any subgroup of a finitely generated free abelian group is finitely generated. Then we see how to represent finitely generated abelian groups as quotients of finite rank free abelian groups, and how to reinterpret such a presentation in term ...
last updated 2012-02-25 with Set 8
last updated 2012-02-25 with Set 8

< 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 59 >

Field (mathematics)

In abstract algebra, a field is a nonzero commutative division ring, or equivalently a ring whose nonzero elements form an abelian group under multiplication. As such it is an algebraic structure with notions of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division satisfying the appropriate abelian group equations and distributive law. The most commonly used fields are the field of real numbers, the field of complex numbers, and the field of rational numbers, but there are also finite fields, fields of functions, algebraic number fields, p-adic fields, and so forth.Any field may be used as the scalars for a vector space, which is the standard general context for linear algebra. The theory of field extensions (including Galois theory) involves the roots of polynomials with coefficients in a field; among other results, this theory leads to impossibility proofs for the classical problems of angle trisection and squaring the circle with a compass and straightedge, as well as a proof of the Abel–Ruffini theorem on the algebraic insolubility of quintic equations. In modern mathematics, the theory of fields (or field theory) plays an essential role in number theory and algebraic geometry.As an algebraic structure, every field is a ring, but not every ring is a field. The most important difference is that fields allow for division (though not division by zero), while a ring need not possess multiplicative inverses; for example the integers form a ring, but 2x = 1 has no solution in integers. Also, the multiplication operation in a field is required to be commutative. A ring in which division is possible but commutativity is not assumed (such as the quaternions) is called a division ring or skew field. (Historically, division rings were sometimes referred to as fields, while fields were called commutative fields.)As a ring, a field may be classified as a specific type of integral domain, and can be characterized by the following (not exhaustive) chain of class inclusions: Commutative rings ⊃ integral domains ⊃ integrally closed domains ⊃ unique factorization domains ⊃ principal ideal domains ⊃ Euclidean domains ⊃ fields ⊃ finite fields
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report