Download Group 2

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
The Story
of Sally
Clark
Group 2 - Jing Kai
(Presenter), Nabilah,
Soon Guan
Reading
Sally Clark (5 February 2017). Retrieved 21 March 2017, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Clark
The statement by Professor Dawidon: SALLY CLARK APPEAL. Retrieved from
http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~apd/SallyClark_report.doc
Overview
Background Information
Conviction for Murder
Analysis of Statistical Evidence
Aftermath
Conclusion
Background Information
• Born an only child in Wiltshire, South
West England)
• Married solicitor Steve Clark (1990)
• Moved to Cheshire, North West
England in order to practice law with
her husband (1994)
Conviction for Murder
• Two separate incidences where Sally Clark’s baby passed away due to
unknown causes (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, SIDS)
• Sally Clark was found alone at home on both occasions
• No evidence to prove or disprove her involvement
• Sally Clark was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on 9th
November, 1999
The Antagonists
Dr Alan Williams
•
Withheld microbiology test results for
second baby
•
Tests showed the bacterium
Staphylococcus aureus in multiple
sites of the baby → Baby could have
died due to health concerns!
The Antagonists
Professor Sir Roy Meadow
•
Bayes analysis: 1 in 73 million chance
(1/8543) x (1/8543) of two children from
an affluent family suffering cot death
•
Conclusion that since this probability is
very low, the probability of murder is very
high
Analysis of Statistical Evidence
1) Assumption of independence → Flaws in calculation:
•
Lurking variables: Gender, genetic or environmental factors
•
Chances of a second death increases by 5-10 fold after the first
•
Uncertainty with probability of double cot death most likely
understated
Analysis of Statistical Evidence
2) Relevance of data:
•
Fallacious logic
•
Probability of double cot death
(Prosecutor’s fallacy)
•
Double cot murder is a less likely phenomenon
•
Relative likelihood should be used
Probably of innocence!
Relative likelihood
P (2 SIDS deaths in a
family) = 1 in 5 million
P (2 murdered babies in
a family) = 1 in 15
million
P (2 SIDS deaths in a family) : P (2 murdered babies in a family) = 3 : 1
Aftermath
• Unearthing of microbiological tests by Sally Clark’s husband
• Along with the case for flawed statistical evidence, Sally Clark was acquitted
in January 2003
• Review of hundreds other cases → 3 similar cases overturned
Aftermath
• Roy Meadow was struck off the medical register in 2005 for serious
professional misconduct but subsequently reinstated after appeal
• Dr Alan Williams was banned from Home Office pathology work and
coroners' cases for three years
• Sally Clark diagnosed with psychiatric problems associated with posttraumatic disorder and alcohol dependency syndrome → Passed away on
16th March 2007 due to acute alcohol intoxication
"Throughout my review, I was horrified by the shoddy fashion in which these
cases were evaluated. It was clear that sound medical principles were abandoned
in favour of over-simplification, over-interpretation, exclusion of relevant data and,
in several instances, the imagining of non-existent findings."
Dr Sam Gulino, forensic pathologist for the State of Florida, USA.
Conclusion
• Logical and accurate use of statistical
information with explanations required
• Data needs to be precise and contextspecific
• Failure to make appropriate inferences
from statistics can result in fatal
consequences
Thank You!