Download A1979HZ36600001

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup

Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
This Week’s Citation Classic
TM
CC/NUMBER 24
JUNE 11,1979
Wigner E P. On the unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group.
Ann. Math. 40:149-204, 1939.
The
article
derives
the
consequences
of
the
symmetries
postulated by the special theory of
relativity on the quantum mechanics
of
elementary
particles
and
elementary sys--tems.
shows that
that
systems. It It shows
the properties of such particles or
systems are completely deter-mined
by these symmetry postulates when
given their mass and their angular
momen--tum at rest. [The SCI®
®
indicates that this paper has been
cited over 430 times since 1961.]
Eugene P. Wigner
Joseph Henry Laboratories
Physics Department
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08540
February 27, 1978
“The article in question, though of an
entirely mathematical nature, was conceived
to answer a question of physics, more
particularly of quantum mechanics. Quantum
mechanics’ description of the state of a
system is very different from those of
classical theories, which give positions,
veloci-ties, etc. of the constituents. Quantum
mechanics describes the state of the system
by a vector in an abstract space, called
complex Hilbert space, a space of infinite
dimensions. Naturally, some further
prescriptions are then needed to obtain from
the knowledge of the components of this
vector the possible outcomes of
observations on the system.
“Quantum mechanics’ description of the
state is ‘linear’ in the sense that if we have,
for instance, two vectors which represent
states with the same energy, the sum or any
linear combina-tion of these vectors also
represents states with the same energy. If ψ1
and ψ2 represent states with energy E, all the
states α 1ψ 1 + α 2 ψ 2 represent such states
where the α are arbitrary com-plex numbers.
This observation applies not only to states
with definite energy but also to states in
which some other physical property is
specified. If this is the case, one can choose
a set of states ψ 1, ψ 2 , ψ 3,... in such a way
that all states with this property (e.g., all
states of energy E) can be written as linearcombinations α1 ψ1 + α2 ψ2 + .....of these.
“If the specified set of states is invariant
under some transformations—as are the
states of an atom of definite energy under
rotations, the state obtained from one of the
ψ ι , under a rotation R, called O Rψ i, can be
written as a linear-combination of the original
states. The coefficients are denoted by
D(R)ki so that ORψi = Σk D(R)kiψk.
The D(R) kj satisfy some mathematical
relations due to the fact that if the state ORψi
is subject to another transformation S one
obtains, naturally, the state ψi rotated by SR,
i.e., the state O S R ψi . The equations so
resulting have been solved by the
mathematicians Frobenius, Schur, and Weyl,
and their usefulness for the theory of atomic
spectra (the states of an atom of definite
energy retain this property even if subject to
a rotation) was recognized already in 1927.
“The present article extends this
con-sideration to all states of a system —
these are invariant under all transformations
of the special theory of relativity (the
inhomogeneous Lorentz group, that is
Lorentz transfor-mations plus displacements
in space and time). The article extends the
results
of
the
aforementioned
mathematicians to this group —a group of
infinite volume. For physics, the results
proved most useful when ap-plied to
elementary particles, but in mathematics,
they started the exten-sion of the
aforementioned results to infinite groups.
“It may be of some interest to recall that
when the manuscript was submit-ted to one
of our mathematical jour-nals, it was rejected
as uninteresting.’ However, when this writer
mentioned this to John Von Neumann, one
of the finest mathematicians of this century
and one of the editors of the Annals of
Mathematics, he said, ‘We would be very
pleased if you gave us this article for
publication; we’d like to have it in the
Annals’ Not all articles originally rejected by a
journal prove to be valueless.”
297