Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA AGROINDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT COUNTRY BRIEF 2014 KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Contents Agro-industry national policy framework ........................................................................................................................ 2 Economic and social development and trends .............................................................................................................. 3 Agro-industry outlook and performance ......................................................................................................................... 5 Trade liberalization, WTO accession and trade performance.................................................................................... 7 Foreign direct investments ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Food safety, certification & quality control ................................................................................................................... 12 Business environment and competitiveness ............................................................................................................... 12 1 Key Economic Indicators1 2009 2011 2012 2013 Food&Beverages Indicators GDP (PPP), current intl.$, billion 14.8 16.1 16.4 18.4 Value Added, % of manufactur. 18.55 Manufacturing VA, % of GDP 16.0 20.6 14.1 n/a 2009 Enterprises, % of manufacturing 2011 2012 2013 n/a n/a n/a 24 n/a n/a 25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a -0.4 n/a n/a 24.62 Agriculture VA, % of GDP 21.1 18.6 19.7 n/a Employment, % of manufact. 24.69 Employment in Agri., % of total 34.0 n/a n/a 19.4 Investments, % of manufact. n/a Gross Fixed Capital F.,% of GDP 28.6 24.0 27.6 n/a FDI inflow, % of total inflow 4.0 11.2 5.6 n/a Net food trade, US$ billion 100.5 100.6 110.0 n/a Food exp.,% of merch. exp. 23.9 25.8 24.7 n/a 1.67 1.97 1.89 n/a Food imports, % of merch. 16.9 16.6 14.6 n/a 108 n/a FDI net inflows., % of GDP Merch. trade., % of GDP Merch. exports, curr. US$ billion n/a imp. Merchandise imports, US$ bln 3.04 4.26 5.37 n/a Food export, 2006-11 growth. 18.6 % Exports annual growth, % -1.08 15.7 -11.3 n/a Food import, 2006-11 24.3 growth.% Imports annual growth, % -19.4 14.9 18.5 n/a Food prod. index (2004- 102 107 06=100) GNI per capita, PPP 1’000 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 c.intl.$ Agribusiness Indicators 3.08 Value Trade per capita, US$ 2010- 1479 FDI inflow rank 106 Global Competitiveness Index 121 2012 Doing Business Indicators Rank Global Merch. Exports Rank ‘12 Imports Rank 2012 70 68 137 126 Agro-industry national policy framework National development programmes: The key documents that set out the Government policies of Kyrgyzstan for overall economic development as well as for agriculture, rural and agro-industry development include: (i) Medium-Term Development Program – Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper for 2012-2014, which provides a complex solution for social and economic problems; (ii) the Agriculture and Food Security Strategy - Concept of Food Security for 2009-2019 that includes measures to increase the volume of agricultural and food products and diminish the import-dependence of the country in foodstuff, and the (draft) Medium-Term Development Program for 2012-2014 with the estimated budget for Development of Agriculture and Processing Industry of KGS 10.4 billion (US$ 201 million); (iii) the Programme of Fisheries development in Kyrgyzstan for 2008-2012; (iv) the Strategic Plan for Veterinary Services of the Kyrgyz Republic 2008-2012; (v) the Concept of industry development for 2012-2015; (vi) the Social Protection Development Strategy for 2012-2014; The Government of Kyrgyzstan is now in the process of reformulating its policies, strategies and investment plans as it endeavors to move the country to a higher level of growth and development after the recent political and food security shocks. One of the important documents is a drafted Strategy of Sustainable Development of Kyrgyzstan for the period 2013-2017. In 2011 the new government embarked on an ambitious reform 1 World Bank Indicators, ITC, FAOSTAT & UNIDO databases, accessed in August 2014. Author’s calculations 2 programme to improve public administration and boost the business environment. The Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation has designed a number of long-term national strategies with mid-term plans and proposed them for public discussions in 2012. Kyrgyzstan has with the EU a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement since 1999, which sets out the political and economic values of the cooperation. Together with the UN organizations Kyrgyzstan elaborated and signed the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) for 2012-2016. Kyrgyzstan is participating in a process of integrating and establishing direct contacts between the agricultural economic entities with the CIS, EurAsEC, SOC through harmonization of the regulatory-legal acts and agreements signed within these agencies. In 2011 the Kyrgyzstan became the sixth full member of the Eurasian Development Bank (Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia and Tajikistan). Potential accession of Kyrgyzstan to the customs union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia remains under negotiation. Legal framework: Kyrgyzstan has adopted a number of laws to encourage a growth of agriculture and agroindustry and rural development, passing the land (2000) and tax (2008) codes, the Presidential Decree on “Development and Support of Enterprises involved in harvesting, processing and marketing of agricultural products” (2000); the law on Food Security (2008); the law on Agriculture development (2009), the law on Cooperatives (2005); the law on State regulation of manufacturing and trade of ethyl alcohol, liquors and spirits (2007); the law on Business partnerships and companies (1996); the law on Peasant farms; the law on Publicprivate partnerships (2012). The amendments to the Tax Code in 2009 provide for exemption of VAT on technological equipment, imported as a contribution to share capital as well as for exemption of profit tax for three years for agro-processing enterprises (except processing of excisable products) based on the annually approved list of agro-enterprises. A number of relevant laws were drafted for further approval, namely: a law on Competition and a law on Consumer’s Protection. Supporting institutions: The main state bodies related to agriculture and agro-industry development in the Kyrgyz Republic are the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation and the Ministry of Economy and Antimonopoly Policy. Other supporting institutions are: the State enterprise information and marketing center "Ayylmaalymat" under the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation; JSC the Kyrgyz Agriculture and Food Corporation (AFC) (established in 2009) that ensure stable functioning of the food market in the interests of producers and meeting public demand for food; the Agribusiness Competitiveness Center (established in 2006) to help food processors be more efficient and profitable; the State enterprise "Center one-stop-shop" in the field of foreign trade under the Ministry of Economy and Antimonopoly Policy; the Rural Advisory Service (RAS) for extension services, the Kyrgyz Agricultural Market Information System, the Food Security Council (established in 2009); the Fruit and Vegetable Association. Economic and social development and trends Economic and social development: Kyrgyzstan is a landlocked and low income country with GNI per capita of US$ 562 (constant 2005) in 2012. The population is 5.78 million, of which 65.49 percent live in rural areas, and the annual population growth is 1.3 percent. Between 2000 and 2004, there was strong economic growth and real GDP increased by approximately 7 percent per year, but in 2005, the first socio-political crisis hit the country’s economy. In 2007 and 2008 the economy recovered rapidly with GDP growth of 8.5 percent on average. However, the socio-political crises of April and June 2010 hampered the recovery of the Kyrgyz economy from the global economic crisis and affected agriculture, trade, construction and the banking system. Real GDP grew by 5.7 per cent in 2011 after a decline in 2010. The economy is still recovering from the political crisis. Kyrgyzstan was, and remains highly dependent on gold mining and agriculture. Over the past decade, despite an increase in real terms the share of the agricultural sector in total GDP has decreased substantially in Kyrgyzstan and since 2000 the share of agriculture value added in total GDP declined from 34 to 19.7 percent in 2012. The agricultural sector still accounts for a large part of the total labour force, employing around 19 percent of the total economically active population in 2014. Manufacturing industry generated about 14.1 percent of GDP in 2012, growing by approximately 15 percent in nearly all major subsectors, except food processing. The share of small and medium-sized businesses is increasing. 3 Chart 1. Evolution of value added to GDP in the Kyrgyz Republic (percent) Source: WBDI 2014 Growing demands and trends: Kyrgyzstan is a net food importer (except in dairy products) and domestic agriculture cannot satisfy demand for a range of commodities such as vegetable oil, flour, meat and poultry products, beverages and high-value grocery products. Flour and flour goods account for more than 30 percent of household expenses for food but wheat production meets about 40-50 percent of requirements with the balance imported from Kazakhstan. Milk is an important element of the diet, with almost 90 percent of households reporting to consume it. There is has been a small increase in the consumption of ready-to-eat food and fish products. Food expenditures represented almost half of total expenditures of severely food-insecure households. On the demand side, private consumption is estimated to have grown by 4.5 percent, reflecting a notable rise in retail sales, despite a small increase in unemployment.2 One of the main tasks of the Government is to reduce poverty in the country. It has been estimated that about 33.7 percent of the population were living below national poverty line in 2011, which has declined from 39.9 percent in 2006. Poverty is higher in rural areas (39 percent) than in urban areas (23 percent) and varies significantly between regions. Extreme poverty declined from 9.1 percent in 2006 to 3.1 percent in 2009 but also increased in 2010 to 5.3 percent, with 4.2 percent in urban areas and 6.0 percent in rural areas3, and continued to increase to 6.2 percent by 2012. In 2010, the five top agricultural products in terms of value in Kyrgyzstan were: cow’s milk (356 million intl$) cattle meat (265 million intl$), potatoes (128 million intl$), sheep meat (118 million intl$), and tomatoes (70 million intl$).4 Besides, the important commodities of domestic production are apples, wheat, beans, walnuts, horse meat and milk, cotton and tobacco. 2 IFC (2012) Kyrgyz Republic: Medium-Term Development Program—Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. Country Report. Approved by Government of the Kyrgyz Republic 3 The Impact of the Economic and Financial Crises on Agriculture and Food Security in Europe and Central Asia: a Compendium 4 FAOSTAT, accessed in November 2012 4 Agro-industry outlook and performance Agro-industry background and challenges: After the collapse of the Former Soviet Union in 1991, the Kyrgyz Republic implemented a number of rapid market oriented reforms and was the first CIS country to join the WTO. Agriculture has a very high importance for Kyrgyzstan’s economy and the successful land-reform policies converted the agricultural sector into an engine for growth during the late 1990s. However, land privatization resulted in the creation of a large number of small private farms (over 300 000 smallholder farmers with an average farm size of about 3 ha), sharing 80-95 percent in total agricultural production. The system of vertical integration and coordination between processors and farmers in production chains were broken. Agro-industrial reforms led by the Kyrgyzstan’s Government and actively supported by various donors have focused on enhancing the development of agribusinesses, modern supply chains and food safety. However, political instability over the last decade had a negative impact on the growth in the overall economy including in the agro-industry. The latest government’s priority is to develop the clusters approach in agro-industry by regions as well as to increase production of meat, dairy, sugar and oil products in order to exclude import dependence from some products and to increase production of export-oriented products such as dairy. Most food processing companies are involved in primarily wheat processing, milk processing and smaller shares go to fruit and vegetables processing. Despite the fact that livestock is one of the major parts of the rural economy in Kyrgyzstan and 87 percent of the territory is occupied by pastures, the meat industry is not well developed. To stimulate replenishment of the key assets, enterprises are exempted from VAT on imported technological equipment included in their foundation capital. Mechanisms of accelerated depreciation are introduced. Processers of agricultural products are exempted from VAT and tax on revenues for a three year period. At the same time, there is a strong dependence on imports of the raw materials and ingredients used for processing. A shortage of floating assets and limited access to commercial loans due to high interest rates impedes replenishment of the key assets and the use of new technology. Organic products have become more popular and expensive commodities in developed countries. Organic production in Kyrgyzstan is growing. The land share under organic products has grown from 0.02 percent to 0.14 percent of the total agriculture land over the period 2005-2010. The number of registered producers has also grown from 225 in 2005 to 987 in 2010,5 and had exceeded 1,000 b y 2011, especially thanks to organic cotton growers. Food & beverage industry performance: The food and beverage industry forms a large part of the Kyrgyzstan’s economy, generating 3.5 percent of GDP. In 2009 food and beverages industry generated US$ 430 million or about 21.6 percent of manufacturing output, grown up by 27 percent to the level of 2008, but representing 14 percent in 2011. After a sharp decline by 32 percent in 2003 the output of the F&B industry grew steadily at about 21.7 percent on average every year between 2004 and 2009, when it seemed to stagnate. Per capita output was US$ 371.1 in 2009, but had fallen to about US$ 330 in 2012. In 2010, the F&B industry employed 11 500 people (or 25 percent of the manufacturing labor force). Employment has been unstable over time and it declined by 8.5 percent year-on-year in 2009. Labour productivity significantly increased between 2000 and 2009, but the number of employees declined by 45 percent in the same period. In 2009 the F&B industry had 409 enterprises operating (or about 24.6 percent of total number of manufacturing enterprises), and in 2010, 387 enterprises most of which were private small or medium-scale enterprises. The number of enterprises decreased by 1.9 times between 2000 and 2010. The most important and fairly well developed food processing industry by turnover is the dairy industry with a stable growth. Flour and sugar producers are the second and third most important food processing industries by turnover. The output of vegetable processing companies is increasing and it has traditionally been one of the largest sectors. Meat industry is underdeveloped and has the lowest turnover compared to other foodprocessing industries. Chart 2: Evolution food industry in Kyrgyz Republic over time 5 Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements IFOAM, 2012, http://www.organic-world.net 5 Source: WBDI Chart 3. Distribution of Output, employment, enterprises and investments in food & beverages subsectors of Kyrgyzstan in 2009 Breakdown of Food & Beverages branches in Kyrgyzstan, 2009 100% 90% 80% 70% 1,371 3,365 77 108 29,449,218 9,421,570 209,523,794 34,118,348 Other food products 60% 50% 40% 1,373 2,015 30% 20% 10% 92 42 3,470 90 22,365,215 Grain mill products; starches; animal feeds 22,495,076 Dairy products 20,090,451 Beverages 54,722,679 71,845,982 65,833,881 Processed meat, fish, fruit, vegetables, fats 0% Employment, Enterprises, Output, US$ Value added, number number US$ Source: Author’s calculations are based on UNIDO data and national statistics 6 Trade liberalization, WTO accession and trade performance Trade regulation and trade unions: Kyrgyzstan has the most liberal trade regime among countries in the region and was the first to join the WTO in 1998. The adopted Custom Code (2004) under the Law on Custom Duties (2006) complies with most international standards and takes into account the regulations of the Kyoto Convention on Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures. The Government has made major liberalizing commitments, such as binding tariffs at relatively low ceiling levels, other import charges and agricultural export subsidies at zero; eliminating discriminatory excise taxes; and applying the customs valuation provisions. Due to growing prices for important foodstuffs the Government has eliminated import tariffs and is to increase export tariffs for some groups of products. Kyrgyzstan has trade relations with 123 countries and has signed free-trade agreements with 10 countries. Kyrgyzstan has officially applied to be next member of the Customs Union, formed by Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia inaugurated in January 2012. Entry into the Customs Union would mean Kyrgyzstan adopting the common external tariff, the average rate of which amounts to 10.6 percent in the CU, whereas the average rate of Kyrgyzstan’s custom duties for 2009 was 5.1 percent. Conflicts between customs union arrangements and the country’s obligations as a WTO member also need to be resolved. Kyrgyzstan – together with seven countries from the CIS (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Ukraine, Moldova and Tajikistan) – signed the CIS FTA in October 2011, which provides for free movement of goods within the territory of the CIS, as well as non-application of import customs duties, non-discrimination, gradual decrease of export customs duties and the abolition of quantitative restrictions in mutual trade between the CIS FTA member states. The CIS FTA came into force for Russia, Belarus and Ukraine in September 2012 as those countries have ratified it. WTO accession: Kyrgyzstan joined WTO on 20 December 1998, being the first CIS country to do so. It is an observer to the Agreement of Government Procurement (GPA) accession with a 0.15 percent contribution to the WTO budget in 2011. The simple average of imports duties for agricultural goods applied in 2009 was 7.7 percent. The latest Trade Policy review by the WTO was in Oct 2006. Trade performance: From 2007 to 2011, despite a decline of 27.2 percent in 2009, Kyrgyzstan's exports increased on average by 14.9 percent each year and amounted to US $2.0 billion in 2011, reflecting an increase of 33 percent from 2010. Imports showed a similar development and increased by 32.2 percent in 2011 to US$ 4.3 billion. This resulted in a trade deficit of US$ 2.3 billion in 2011, compared to US$ 1.7 billion in 2010. In 2013 total imports exceeded US$ 5 billion, while imports were around US$ 1 8 billion, showing a US$ 3 2 billion trade deficit6. Kyrgyzstan is import-dependent country in F&B products, except dairy products, which represent about half of total exports along with tomato products (tomato paste). The trade balance of processed F&B experienced a negative food balance of US$ 410 million in 2011, higher than any previous year. Food and agricultural exports and imports together accounted for 10.1 percent and 15.4 percent of total merchandise exports and imports of Kyrgyzstan in 2011. Processed F&B products accounted US$ 60 million or 3.0 percent of total merchandise exports and US$ 470 million or 11.1 percent of total merchandise imports in 2011 with an annual growth of 7.4 percent and 47.9 percent respectively, compared to a negative growth of 20 percent of exports and of 9.3 percent of imports in 2009. The exports per capita of F&B were US$ 10.9 in 20117. The import of F&B products are diversified and the highest share of imported products is with sugars and sugar confectionery products group (20 percent, ranking in world imports 89), vegetable oils (15 percent, ranked 108), cocoa preparations (15 percent, ranked 65), and beverages (13 percent, ranked 100). Dairy products account for 6 http://www.indexmundi.com/kyrgyzstan/ 7 FAOSTAT 2014 7 48 percent of exports (ranking in world exports 70), while other large commodities groups are beverages (17 percent, ranked 108), and miscellaneous edible preparations (12 percent, ranked 95).8 Across partners, exports of Kyrgyzstan’s F&B commodities were not diversified in 2011, where Kazakhstan shared 62 percent of total exports, compared to relatively diversified imports, where four countries made 86 percent of total F&B imports. Top destinations for F&B products: Kazakhstan (62 percent), Tajikistan (14 percent), Russia (9 percent), UAE (6 percent), and Uzbekistan (4 percent) in 2011. Top origins for F&B products: Russia (39 percent), Kazakhstan (19 percent), Ukraine (16 percent), Belarus (12 percent), and Turkey (2 percent) in 2011. Chart 4. Food and agriculture trade performance over time Source: WBDI 2014 8 ITC (UNCDAT/WTO) 8 Chart 5. Share of product groups in total exports and imports of food & beverages, top ten products Share of product groups in total F&B exports by Kyrgyzstan in 2011 3% 2% 2% 1% 0% Share of product groups in total F&B imports by Kyrgyzstan in 2011 3% 0% 7% 6% 1% 1% 4% 20% 9% 10% 48% 12% 15% 11% 13% 17% Dairy products, eggs, honey, edible animal product 15% Sugars and sugar confectionery Beverages, spirits and vinegar Animal,vegetable fats and oils, cleavage products Miscellaneous edible preparations Cocoa and cocoa preparations Cereal, flour, starch, milk preparations and products Beverages, spirits and vinegar Cocoa and cocoa preparations Milling products, malt, starches, inulin, wheat gluten Meat, fish and seafood food preparations Cereal, flour, starch, milk preparations and products Vegetable, fruit, nut, etc food preparations Miscellaneous edible preparations Sugars and sugar confectionery Dairy products, eggs, honey, edible animal product Milling products, malt, starches, inulin, wheat gluten Vegetable, fruit, nut, etc food preparations Residues, wastes of food industry, animal fodder Meat, fish and seafood food preparations Animal,vegetable fats and oils, cleavage products Residues, wastes of food industry, animal fodder Chart 6. Evolution of the top five destinations of exported F&B products by Kyrgyzstan over time Source: ITC (UNCTAD/WTO). Data is based on the selected products’ groups. Trade Map online, accessed in October 2012 9 Chart 7. Growth of national supply and international demand for exports of F&B products by Kyrgyzstan in 2011 Source: ITC (UNCTAD/WTO). Data is based on the selected products’ groups. Trade Map online, accessed in October 2012 Foreign direct investments Strategies, regulations and ranking: Kyrgyzstan has a liberal investment regime on paper with a broad base of commercial laws in place among those are the Law on Investments (2003); the Law on State Registrations of Legal Entities and the Law on Free Economic Zones. Attracting FDI is a priority of the Kyrgyzstan’s Government. There is an investment department at the Ministry of Economy and Antimonopoly Policy, which assists investors with bureaucratic procedures. Kyrgyzstan has entered into bilateral treaties on mutual support, encouragement and protection of investment (capital expenditure) with 27 countries. There are five Free Economic Zones (FEZs) in the country. According to WIR 2012,9 Kyrgyzstan was ranked 64 (among 181 economies) on the FDI Inward Attraction Index in 2011, which is a significant improvement compared to 114 in 2000 (among 178 economies). According to the IAB report,10 Kyrgyzstan is one of the more open countries to foreign capital participation, where all sectors, with the exception of the domestic and international air transportation sectors, are fully open to foreign capital participation. Kyrgyz legislation provides for equal treatment of domestic and foreign investors. It takes four procedures and 12 days to establish a foreign-owned limited liability company (LLC) in Bishkek, making it one of the faster processes in the EECA region. An LLCs need a minimum of two shareholders. Companies are registered at the one-stop shop at the Ministry of Justice. Companies in the Kyrgyz Republic are free to open and maintain bank accounts in foreign currencies. There is no minimum capital requirement, although the authorized capital stipulated in the constitutive documents must be paid in full within the first year of the company’s operation. Foreign companies can lease privately or publicly held land (for 50 years). The 9 UNCTAD (2012) World Investment Report 2012: Towards a New Generation of Investment Policies, UN Conference on Trade and Development NY and Geneva, Switzerland 10 IFC/MIGA/WB (2010) Investing Across Borders: Indicators of foreign direct investment regulation in 87 economies. The World Bank Group. Washington 10 land code prohibits the purchase of land by foreign companies. The land may be leased through an auction or tender process or through direct negotiations with the relevant public authority. There is also a favorable fiscal climate (profit and income tax is 10 percent and VAT is 12 percent) Foreign direct investments flow: Overall, FDI in the Kyrgyz economy is low per capita compared to the other CIS countries and it has decreased as a result of social tensions and political instability in the country since 2009. In 2011 Kyrgyzstan’s FDI inflows accounted US$ 390 million or 6.6 percent of GDP with an annual decline by 11 percent, almost reaching the peak of FDI inflow of 2009. In 2013, FDI inflows were at US$ 758 million.11 Between 2007 and 2010, there was a substantial increasing the inflow of foreign capital in the agri-food industry. However, in 2011, there was a drop in the inflow of foreign capital. The vast majority of FDI is directed to manufacturing, food processing, banking and mining. FDI in the agricultural sector is relatively limited. Manufacturing is the biggest recipient of FDI, generating about 55 percent of total FDI inflow in 2011.12 In 2010 largest sources of FDI were Canada (37 percent), United Kingdom (16 percent), China (12 percent) and Russia (10 percent).13 The following countries are listed as the largest sources of FDI in first nine months of 2011: Canada (48 percent), China (14 percent), United Kingdom (7 percent), Germany (6 percent). In 2010 largest sources of FDI were Canada (37 percent), United Kingdom (16 percent), China (12 percent) and Russia (10 percent)14. Many foreign firms are contractors of foreign assistance organizations. In 2010 there were 98 enterprises (or 17.9 percent of total industrial enterprises with foreign investments) with foreign investments operating in Kyrgyzstan, employing 4 867 people (or13.4 percent of industrial).15 In 2009 manufacturing companies with foreign investments employed 38 percent of total labor force and counted 520 enterprises decreased in 1.4 times more than in 2005. In 2009 the food, beverage and tobacco industries counted 99 enterprises with foreign investments making more than third of the total manufacturing output and employing 5 228 people. Joint ventures and foreign companies are involved in production of wheat flower, macaroni, packed tea, mineral water, non-alcoholic beverages (Coca-Cola Icecek), dairy products (Wimm Bill Dann from Russia, Dairy Spring from Switzerland), packaging/bottling (Plaskap Company) and tobacco products (Reemtsma company). Chart 8. Foreign direct investments in Kyrgyzstan over time Source: WBDI 2014 11 World Investment Report 2014 http://www.mineconom.kg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2020&Itemid=725&lang=en 13 http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2012/191179.htm 14 http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2012/191179.htm 15 National Statistic Committee of Kyrgyz Republic (2011) Activities of enterprises with FDI for 2006-2010 12 11 Food safety, certification & quality control Food safety background and country’s membership: Kyrgyzstan is a member of the Codex Alimentarius Commission and a correspondent member of the International Organization of Standardization (ISO). Issues of protection of human health in general and in particular from food-borne risks, which come under the SPS Agreement, are dealt with by the Law on Sanitary-epidemiological Safety of Population (2003) and the Law on Veterinary (2005). The country’s existing system for regulating the safety of foods and related production processes is not in a full compliance with internationally accepted regulations and WTO requirements yet. A draft of a law on Requirements for the safety of food products and processes of their manufacturing, storage, transportation, marketing and utilization was elaborated by the Ministry of Health. A number of projects of international organizations (WB, ITC, GTZ) were conducted in order to streamline the compulsory standards requirements for business, develop systems to enhance product quality and safety and to support Kyrgyzstan becoming a member of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation and establishing a national information body and national reference centers on technical barriers to trade and sanitary and phytosanitary measures within the WTO framework. Quality control and certification: The Republican National Centre for Veterinary Diagnosis and Republican State Seed Inspectorate under the Ministry of Agriculture and Land Improvement are responsible for veterinary and phytosanitary control in Kyrgyzstan. The Republican Sanitary-Epidemiology station under the Ministry of Health is responsible for sanitary-epidemiological control in Kyrgyzstan. The Centre for Standards and Metrology of the Ministry of Economy and Antimonopoly Policy together with the technical committees for standardization is responsible for standardization and certification criteria. In accordance with the Laws on the Fundamentals of Technical Regulation (2004, amended in 2009) of Kyrgyzstan certification is only required for products that can potentially endanger consumer health (like alcohol, tobacco products, equipment etc.). This reduced obligatory standards coverage from 70 to 22 percent. Other goods can be certified on a voluntary basis, but only to confirm product quality. There are 172 Kyrgyz state standards as well as over 1 500 CIS intergovernmental standards for foodstuffs. ISO standards have begun to be adopted. The Government’s resolution (2006) on procedures for the importation of products subject to mandatory conformity certification regulates the standards for imports. Raw materials, semi-finished and final products, including ingredients and equipment must meet requirements stipulated in relevant Sanitary Rules and Regulations (SanPiN) and National State Standards (GOSTs). Business environment and competitiveness Retail and domestic market: The domestic retail market is underdeveloped and fragmented across the country and it has been slowly emerging mainly in the capital. Retail trade of food products generated KGS 69 billion (US$ 1.5 billion) in 2009 sharing 53 percent of the total retail turnover, where flower and bakery products generated 26 percent, meat products – 15 percent and alcoholic products – 14 percent. Business environment: According to the Doing Business Report,16 through business reforms the Kyrgyz Republic has improved the process of starting a business and enforcing contracts in comparison with 2010. The economy was ranked 70 (out of 185 economies) in 2012 (3 points down compared to 2010; 14 point up compared to 2006). Trading across the borders is ranked 174, paying taxes – 168, protecting investors – 13, getting credit – 12, and starting business – 15. Kyrgyzstan is ranked 10 out of the top 50 economies the most improved overall (by 14.8 percent of points) in narrowing the distance to frontier since 2005 as well as by 42 percent improvement in dealing with construction permits and by 38 percent in getting credit. While still among the most difficult countries in terms of obtaining electricity, Kyrgyzstan has good practice around the world to obtain an electricity connection and it has narrowed the distance to the frontier in getting electricity the most since 2010 (by 11 percent). Kyrgyzstan is considered one of the slowest and the most costly economies in terms of exporting and importing. 16 WB/IFC (2012) Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-size Enterprises. 10th edition. Washington, USA 12 Kyrgyzstan has formed regulatory reform committee at the inter-ministerial level, reporting that use the DBIs as one input to inform their programs for improving the business environment. Taxation relief: According to a PWC report17, in 2012, the Kyrgyz Republic made paying taxes costlier for firms by introducing a real estate tax, though it also reduced the sales tax rate. The new Tax Code (2009) has flattened personal income tax to 10 percent and VAT from 20 to 12 percent. Kyrgyzstan is also a party to 30 double tax treaties as of 2011. Agriculture is exempt from VAT. Certain goods that are imported temporarily are fully or partially exempt from payment of customs duties and taxes. Excise taxes are imposed on locally produced and imported goods: alcohol, beer, tobacco, wines, coffee and cacao, raw materials for wines. Research & Development, innovations: Required investments and activities in R&D of new technologies and products in agro-industry still remain low. State-owned enterprises continue to be the primary beneficiaries of government support for innovation and R&D. In 2009 expenditures in R&D accounted 0.16 percent of GDP, decreased in share of 0.23 percent of GDP in 2007. Investments in R&D represented about 19 percent of total F&B output in 2009. Competitiveness: According to the Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013 Kyrgyzstan is at the first stage of development (factor driven), it got only 127 overall Global Competitiveness Index among 144 economies (121 in 2010-2011 among 139 countries). Kyrgyzstan is ranked only 142 for Innovation, 130 for Business sophistication factors, and 129 (score 3.1) for agricultural policy costs18. In 2014, Kyrgyzstan is ranked 68 regarding ease of doing business among 189 countries. The five problematic factors for doing business in Kyrgyzstan are: policy instability, corruption, government instability/coups, inefficient government bureaucracy and access to financing. According to IDR 201119 Kyrgyzstan in the context of the Competitive Industrial Performance index (CIP) was ranked 101 in 2009 with no changes compared to 2005 with manufacturing value added per capita of US$ 50 and US$ 46, respectively. Competitive industrial performance index decreased from 0.01 in 1995 to 0.005 in 2011, ranked as 116 among the 134 countries measured20. 17 PwC (2012) Paying Taxes 2012. The Global Picture, PriceWaterhouseCoopers supported by WB and IFC Agricultural policy costs: How would you assess the agricultural policy in your country? [1 = excessively burdensome for the economy; 7 = balances the interests of taxpayers, consumers, and producers] | 2011–12 weighted average 19 UNIDO (2012) Industrial Development Report 2011. Industrial energy efficiency for sustainable wealth creation: Industrial energy efficiency for sustainable wealth creation: capturing environmental, economic and social dividends. Vienna, Austria. UNIDO’s Competitive Industrial Performance (CIP), page 18-19. Note: 144 economies in total. From 2011 the CIP index comprises eight indicators classified in six dimensions: (i) Industrial capacity, measured by MVA per capita; (ii) Manufactured export capacity, measured by manufactured exports per capita; (iii) Impact on world MVA, measured by an economy’s share in world MVA. 20 UNIDO 2014 18 13 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. For more information please contact: Stjepan Tanic Agri-food Economist FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia Email: [email protected] 14