Download DNAFingerprintingWalkerC

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Probability and Statistics of
DNA Fingerprinting
• (posterior odds) = (likelihood ratio) (prior odds)
• The “strength” of a piece of evidence includes:
– Its accuracy.
– Its meaning.
• DNA evidence merely tries to connect or
disconnect a piece of evidence to a suspect. It
makes NO assertions of guilt or innocence!!!
• (Weir, slide 26)
• Key questions:
– The “event” is that a piece of DNA evidence
matches the DNA of the suspect:
• How likely is this evidence to have that type, if it
comes from the suspect? (prosecution)
• How likely is this evidence to have that type, if it
comes from someone else? (defense)
•
(Weir, slide 27)
P E Hp
L
P E Hd
1
L
P CprofileA SprofileA
• Assuming independence in the allele
frequencies:
– Example:
• 18 alleles, each with a frequency of Pa = 0.1.
– L1 = 1 / (Pa ^ 18)
– L1 = 10^18
• (Weir, slide 35)
• Allele frequency dependence due to
evolution:
2 Theta
P aa aa
1
Theta Pa 3 Theta
1
Theta 1
1
Theta Pa
2 Theta
– Dealing with pairs of alleles.
– Theta is the probability that two alleles, each
from a different randomly selected person, are
identical due to evolutionary means.
• Assuming dependence in the allele
frequencies due to evolution:
– Example:
• 18 alleles
• Pa = 0.1
• Theta = 0.04
– P(aa) = 0.0338462
– The new Pa = Sqrt[P(aa)] = 0.18397
– L2 = (L1) (5.582886 x 10^-4)
• Adjustments of allele frequencies due to
sampling effects:
– Can’t make a DNA profile of everyone!
– Must estimate how inaccurate your DNA database
might be.
Pa 1 Pa
Panew Pa
Zc
N
– Zc is in terms of standard deviations
– N is the number of alleles at the specific locus in the
database
(confidence interval for proportions for an infinite binomial population)
• Adjustments in allele frequencies due to
sampling limitations:
– Example:
• Pa = 0.1
• N = 10000
• Zc = 3 (99.73% - Really greater, approx 99.86%)
• New Pa = 0.103
• L3 = (L1)(0.5874)
Effects of human error:
Example:
N = 10000 (number of cases)
PoliceError = 0.02
LabError = 0.001
DNATestError = 1/(some L) = 1/(50 x 10^6)
(1-PoliceError)(1-LabError)(1-DNATestError)
= (1-PoliceError)(1-LabError) approx.
Human Error is overwhelming the deciding
factor with the accuracy of DNA fingerprinting!
• Conclusions
– Human error is the overwhelming factor in the
accuracy of DNA fingerprinting. (However, its
involved in all forms of evidence.)
– Allele frequencies are NOT independent of
each other. However when evolutionary
considerations and sampling considerations
are taken into account, the accuracy of DNA
fingerprinting is still “beyond human
experience”.
– A statement of the accuracy of some piece of
DNA evidence, by itself, is NOT a statement
of guilt of innocence!