Download UNIVERSAL QUANTUM COMPUTING: ANTICIPATORY …

Document related concepts

Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup

Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Quantum potential wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup

Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Kaluza–Klein theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum chaos wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Instanton wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Wave packet wikipedia , lookup

Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup

Quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Relational approach to quantum physics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Theory of everything wikipedia , lookup

AdS/CFT correspondence wikipedia , lookup

Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Event symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
How Mind-Body Interactions
Surmount the Uncertainty Principle
Richard L. Amoroso
Noetic Advanced Studies Institute
It is impossible by definition to violate the uncertainty
principle, within the framework of Copenhagen
phenomenology arising from operation of a ‘Heisenberg
Microscope’. This is an empirical fact demonstrated by the
Stern-Gerlach experiment for example where space
quantization is produced along the z axis by continuous
application of a non-uniform magnetic field to atomic
spin structure. The simplistic solution is therefore ‘to do
something else’. Here a putative protocol is delineated for
surmounting the uncertainty relation. The methodology
(ontological & in causal violation of Copenhagen
phenomenology) relies on the conformal invariance of the
symmetry conditions of new cosmological parameters
amenable to hierarchical coherently controlled resonant
interactions.
Either B or C can be observed
Not B & C Simultaneously
Another View of Measurement
The potentia Y : N not accessible
in real space
Major Violation of the
Uncertainty Principle
CURRENT THINKING
Based on
- Big Bang Cosmology
- Cognitive Psychology
The Bigbang (naturalistic or atheistic
cosmology) is said to originate from an initial
singularity. This is an observational illusion
in HAM cosmology.
The currently dominant Cognitive
Approach asks: “What processes in
the brain give rise to Awareness”?
A category error for Philosophy of Mind
Instead ask “What processes give rise to
Awareness?”
The NOETIC APPROACH
• We dispute the assumptions of
Bigbang cosmology
• And Cognitive Psychology
With addition of the Unitary field,
spirit, prana or chi we get instead.
‘Behold the lilies of the field, even Solomon
was not arrayed like one of these’.
We only observe the central (person)
portion with our natural eyes
New Principles
• In order to bring these parameters
into Physical science a new view
of reality or cosmology must be
introduced
ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION
- Hubble discovered redshift not
expansion of the universe
- Instead of Doppler redshift,
redshift is caused by „Tired Light”
OUR SENSES VIEW THE WORLD AS
A 3D EUCLIDIAN ARENA
This 3D scientific view of Newtonian
mechanics survived until the early 1900s.
For Newton time was independent
We Live In Time, ‘God’ Lives In HD Eternity.
The HD Cannot Be Seen By Natural Eyes,
microscopes or telescopes. Therefore one
Assumes
We Must Live In a subspace of eternity or
“Virtual Reality”
The introduction of Einstein’s relativities &
quantum theory between 1905 & 1925
changed the 3D world view to a 4D view.
But the temporal human mind is
incapable of perceiving 4 dimensions
Sometimes the 4D hypercube
is viewed exploded like this
A 3D cube may be unfolded
into a 2D plane by loosing 1D
Visualizing the 4th dimension
Likewise a 4D hypercube unfolds into a 3D
cross in a similar manner , in 5D the 3D
cubes would be 4D hypercubes - etc to 12D
VISUALIZING THE 4th DIMENSION
A 3D cube is unfolded to a 2D plane.
A 4D hypercube is unfolded into its 8
component 3D cubes in the same manner. If a
5D hypercube were unfolded, the 8 cubes
forming the 3D cross would be made of eight
4D hypercubes and so on.
12D is the minimum D to describe eternity
The central translucent cube representing observed 3D
Euclidian reality is surrounded by six adjacent cubes. The
8th cube called the satellite cube may be placed arbitrarily on
any of the adjacent cubes. Carrying this metaphor to 12D
Amoroso’s model states that the central cube and 12D
satellite are causally
separated.
(HAM) COSMOLOGY
HOLOGRAPHIC
ANTHROPIC
MULTIVERSE
EVOLUTION OF 10D STRING THEORY TO
11D M-THEORY TO 12D HAM COSMOLOGY
Points can no longer be considered
as fundamental objects.
THE VIRTUAL EUCLIDIAN PRESENT IS A LOCUS OF
POINTS, RESEMBLING WITTEN’S STRING VERTEX.
Dirac Spherical Rotation as Basis of the Continuous-State
Figure drawn by Stan Tenen – Meru Foundation
In Holographic Anthropic Multiverse (HAM)
cosmology observed temporal reality is a 3(4)D
virtual subspace of an 11(12)D eternity in
correspondence with the tenets of the F-Theory
incarnation of M-Theory; 12D being the minimum
number of dimensions (D) to signify causal
separation from temporality. Succinctly HAM
cosmology postulates an infinite number of nested
Hubble spheres each with their own laws of physics;
this and other details of the HAM will be discussed in
detail. The HAM “Present” is a dynamic instant, a
continuous-state standing wave of the least
cosmological unit of the 12D Superspace undergoing
a Continuous Dimensional Reduction /
Compactification Process (CDRC) based on
extensions of the Wheeler-Feynman-Cramer
Absorber/Transactional models. This HAM dynamic
entails an energy dependent spacetime metric as 1st
proposed by Einstein.
CONTINUED Meaning HD properties of the CDRC
standing wave metric entail a form of future-past
‘hysteresis’ loop. Energetics of this 12D hysteresis
least unit reveal a new action principle driving the
evolution of the HAM, cosmology itself a form of selforganized complex system. Since the HAM is scale
invariant these energetics also apply to self-organized
Autopoietic living systems. This new teleological or
noetic action principle is shown to be associated with
the unitary physical field and a form of ‘super quantum
potential’ as postulated by de Broglie and Bohm.
These parameters allow an alternate derivation of
string tension anticipated to shed light on recalculating
Planck’s constant and completing quantum theory.
HAM cosmology is empirically testable and an
experimental protocol for isolation of the new energy
dynamics is presented.
WHAT IS THE HOLOGRAPHIC CONSCIOUS MULTIVERSE?
• There Is No Bigbang (temporal Singularity), Expansion Or Inflation.
• Redshift Is Non-Doppler Due To Periodic Photon Mass (Tired Light).
• CMBR Is Cavity QED Blackbody (BB) Radiation.
• Thus CMBR Is Emission & Redshift Absorption For BB Equilibrium.
• The HCM Is Closed & Finite In Time / Open And Infinite Eternally.
• This Relates To The Holographic Principle – A Multiverse With
Potential For An Infinite Number Of Nested Hubble Spheres (H_R) Each
With Their Own Laws Of Physics.
• Dark Energy Arises From The Rest Of The Multiverse Beyond H_R.
• Cosmological Constant Is Based On This Horizon - Fluctuating -, 0, +.
• The HCM Is Not Static Or Steady-State But A Continuous-State (CS).
• The CS Provides A Standing Wave Present From Future-Past
Elements In A CS Spin Exchange Dimensional Reduction
Compactification Process- i.e. The XD Can Be Infinitely Large > 4D And
Planck Size < 3D.
• 3D Reality Is A ‘Pocket Space’ Or Temporal Subspace Of 12D Eternity.
• A Conscious Universe Requires an Additional Teleological (Noetic)
Action Principle Guiding Evolution and Complex Self-Oranization.
Many Processes Describe The
Standing Wave Present Instant
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Dimensional Reduction
Continuous Compactification
Spin exchange / Parallel Transport
Continuous-State
Holographic Principle
Future-Past Transaction
Super Quantum Potential
Noetic Action Principle -Teleological
Standing waves are created by reflection
from the future past boundary conditions
R1
R2
A simple 1D standing wave like
on a stringed instrument
The 1D string maps out a smooth envelope in the
same way frames of film create a movie
A 2D standing wave
A 3D standing wave like on a drum
Imagine these mirrors are like
future past boundary conditions
The charges of rarified molecules in the
ionasphere, act like mirrors to reflect radio waves.
The 12D oscillation of the Casimir-like conditions
of each point has sufficient degrees of freedom to
create a virtual reality like a hologram.
THE PRESENT IS A 12D STANDING
WAVE OF THE FUTURE-PAST
In this conceptualization components of M_4 are blown
up into the complex HD regime revealing the rich
structure of the XD’s control.
THE PRESENT IS A TEMPORAL SUBSPACE OF ETERNITY,
REALITY A 12D STANDING WAVE OF THE FUTURE-PAST
The Virtual 3(4)D Present is Piloted by a Guidance
Principle, Equated In A Conscious Multiverse With
The Unitary Field, Chi, Prana Or ‘Spirit Of God’.
LEAST UNIT ADVANCED /
RETARDED POTENTIALS FOR
COMPLEXIFIED [x, t]
THE PRESENT IS A 12D STANDING
WAVE OF THE FUTURE-PAST
In this conceptualization components of M_4 are blown
up into the complex HD regime revealing the rich
structure of the XD’s control.
Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation
Structure of a transaction (present state or event)
where the present is a standing-wave of future-past
elements. The separation of these parameters in
terms of de Broglie’s fusion model is suggested to
allow manipulation of the harmonic tier.
CRAMER’S TRANSACTIONAL INTERPRETAQTION
OF QT (Following Wheeler-Feynman)
A FUTURE-PAST TRANSACTION
Offer waves from the past confirmed by the future
result in events (Cramer). HAM Cosmology extends
this principle to the HD topology of spacetime where
each present instant is a (EPR –Type) standing
wave, the locus of which is the arrow of time.
Some scientists think extra dimensions are
curled up microscopically small at each point.
A more complex view of the XD 30 years
later – Stringy Calabi-Yau Space
In HAM Cosmology there are
large-scale XD with information
‘conformally Invariant’
• This means quantum states of information
in Euclidian space (Particle in a box)
exists in the higher dimensions also.
• To surmount the Uncertainty Principle a
method is devised to access HD Info in an
Ontological or interactionless manner
CONTINUOUS STATE DIMENSIONAL
REDUCTION - COMPACTIFICATION
How the Structure of Reality Creates the Arrow of Time in
Continuous-State Cosmology
Philosophical Foundation
• Many researchers have explored the zero-point field as an
avenue for manipulating vacuum energy. For the most part
we consider this work metaphorically descriptive of only
the “fog over the ocean” rather than the structural
phenomenology of the ocean itself.
•
New assumptions are made concerning the Dirac
polarized vacuum that relate to the structure of matter in
terms of Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (RQFT)
extended to 12D in the context of a Holographic Anthropic
Multiverse (HAM) where spacetime is an energy dependent
metric.
•
In this anthropic cosmology (a self-organized complex
system) the observed spacetime present is a virtual
standing wave of highly ordered Wheeler-Feynman-Cramer
parameters. A new noetic principle synonymous with the
unitary field drives self-organization.
Orchard or Gravestones
When passing by a graveyard or fruit tree orchard in gazing
into the area ones view alternates from being blocked to
being open to infinity. This metaphor is meant to symbolize
the difference between phenomenological and ontological
versions of quantum theory.
Symmetry of Spacetime
The conformally invariant resonance
hierarchy of Noetic Spacetime
Spacetime temporal nodes to quantify the
symmetry conditions of the incursive
harmonic oscillator
2D Standingwave Resonance
Hierarchy
From incursive discretization, two solutions providing a
structural bifurcation of the system which together
produce Hyperincursion. The effect of increasing the
time interval discretizes the trajectory. This represents a
background independent discretization of spacetime.
In the Continuous-State there is a complementarity between
field and discretization similar to wave-particle duality & the
Dirac spherical rotation for the electron, only here it applies
to the topology of spacetime itself and the standing wave of
the Euclidian grid of perceived reality.
Illustration of the 360-720 degree dual
geometry of Dirac spherical rotation
Dimensional Topological Switching
HAM SPACE - TIME SYMMETRY
Conceptualized cavity-QED multi-level Sagnac effect interferometer
designed to ‘punch’ a hole in spacetime to emit the ‘eternity wave, ’. b)
Components of the applied harmonic oscillator - classical, quantum,
relativistic, transactional and incursive required to achieve coherent
control of the cumulative resonance coupling hierarchy to produce
harmonic nodes of destructive and constructive interference in the
spacetime backcloth.
Resonant Coupling nodes for the
harmonic oscillator
Perfect Rolling Contact
• The mechanical concept of rolling contact is used to
geometrically illustrate the ontological framework for the
new noetic commutation rules of angular momentum. In
any given frame only the Z axis will commute as per
standard quantum theory; but in the complex HD space the
non-commutative parameters commute on rotation through
tangents of proper obliquity in the continuous state
topology. Considering all hyperplanes there are periodic
simultaneous moments of commutation that may be
accessible by RF pulses of the proper harmonic cyclotron
frequency as described by the Bessel function.
These logarithmic curves are not closed. To adapt them to continuous
motion, pairs must be utilized. Joining corresponding sections of the
spiral form a symmetrical uni-lobed wheel. While the sectors do not need
to be equal or symmetrical, the ‘wheels’ must be paired with sectors of
equal obliquity in contact for pure rolling motion to occur. Wheels may
also be bi-lobed or tri-lobed etc. up to 12D to illustrate our Superspace. A
tier of three symmetrical wheels is illustrated in Fig. 3.
Perfect Rolling Motion and
logarithmic spirals
Multi-tiered Experimental Platform
Additional Spin exchange conditions for continuous-state
dimensional reduction during periodic production of the
deficit angle during parallel transport around the geometric
topology of the fundamental spacetime least-units relating
technically to the Bianchi identities and Regge calculus
describing gravitational curvature
Scale Invariance of the triune
properties of least units
The fabric of spacetime: 12D Spacetime
Tiling is Believed able to Project all
Geometric Forms
Physical Cosmology Of The
Fundamental Least Unit
The Fundamental Cosmological Least Unit is introduced
in the context of an advanced form of Einstein’s model
of a static universe, called the Continuous State
Conscious Universe (CSCU) [1]. The new cosmology
is based on principles of the Wheeler-Feynman
absorber theory of radiation extended to the topology
of a periodic 12D spacetime. The fundamental least
unit is shown to be a scale invariant complex
cosmological system. The translating boundary
conditions of a spin exchange ‘continuous state’
dimensional reduction compactification process are
inherent in the Dirac polarized vacuum. The topology
is derived by coupling superluminal Lorentz boosts
with noncompactified Kaluza-Klein theory in the
context of an energy dependent spacetime metric.
EUCLIDIAN / MINKOWSKI GEOMETRY AS THE BASIS
FOR REALITY
• The Euclidian line is assumed to be the real line [1] because it is what is
observed. Logical reasons from supersymmetry and supergravity suggest
there are a number of additional unobserved dimensions [2] leaving the
issue of dimensionality as an open question. Euclidian space in classical
Newtonian terms is a continuous 3D absolute space with time an
independent parameter.
• Einstein’s theories of relativity provided a discrete 3(4)D transmutable
relational spacetime manifold. The debate between absolute space or
substantivism and relational space still continues. Utilizing the standard
definition of a straight line as the intersection of two rigid planes,
measurements could be taken to observe whether the angles of a triangle
add up to 180 degrees; but settling the question definitively would require
astronomical scale measurements where it appears physically impossible to
apply the concept of a rigid body or to define a straight line in terms of a light
ray by stellar parallax because of the effects of general relativity. Therefore
all physics knows with certainty at the present time is that observed space is
approximately Euclidian as is Minkowski space [1, 36].
•
According to the proof of Schoenflies theorem [10] there can be no
topological knots in a plane. Therefore there can be no torsion in a 2D
reality; thus the real line must be at least 3D Euclidian where the standard
Pythagorean line element is:
ds 
2
2
dx1

2
dx2

2
dx3
(2)
•
This assumption that the Euclidian line is the real line is intuitive.
Currently there is no known method of empirical proof; and since the
Euclidian line is what the Human mind apprehends it remains the formal
basis for all scientific fact [1, 23]. But this assumption remains profoundly
problematical with issues stemming from both the foundations of
mathematics and the nature of physical theory itself concerning the
fundamental basis for sets, discreteness versus continuity, geometry and
topology, and the relationship of real numbers to rational numbers for
example [1].
•
In general, the class of theories unifying gauge and gravitational fields
by utilizing extra dimensions is called Kaluza-Klein theories. In these
theories spontaneous symmetry breaking by coordinate transformation in
five dimensions is a product of the standard four-dimensional transformation
and a local U(1) gauge group arising in basic form in a general relativistic
framework of five dimensions described according to the Einstein-Hilbert
action

A  d x g R.
5
(3)
ENERGY DEPENDENT SPACETIME METRIC
Einstein originated the concept of an energy dependent spacetime for
explaining temporal rate change in the presence of a gravitational field
by generalizing the special relativistic line element
ds2 (12 /c2)c2dt 2 dx2 dy2 dz2
with the introduction of time curvature [14] where phi is the Newtonian
gravitational potential. This utilizes the deformed Minkowski metric
(introduced above by eq. 5) which is imbedded in the periodic HD
Noetic space chosen axiomatically for HCM cosmology to take the form
of a noncompactified Kaluza-Klein theory [2,3]. Sections 1.6 & 1.7
demonstrate the feasibility of an energy domain pervading HD spacetime
with properties similar to Wheeler’s Geon proposal discussed in section
1.6 below. In a generalized deformed spacetime metric , spacetime is
fixed by the energy and has the metric
( E )  diag.(a( E ), b( E ), c( E ), d ( E ))
THE PERMUTATION OF DIMENSIONS IN THE
NOETIC TRANSFORMATION
Only certain pathways for parallel transport by spin exchange
dimensional reduction (D down scaling) and superluminal
boosting (D up scaling) are allowed by the Wheelere-Feynman
symmetry breaking relations in the continuous maintenance of the
standing wave present.
Figure 5. The figure shows the four counter-propagating circular
permutations of the vertices of a cube that represent parallel
transport about each of the diagonals. These allowed paths and
orientations constrict the dimensional reduction of the entourage
of associated spaces into symmetry breaking pathways according
to strict rules. This diagram is a modification of a trajectory model
describing a Schrodinger particle [26].
It is useful to clarify the utility of the dual covering modes
in terms of parallel transport and the Regge equations
relation to the Bianchi identity of a boundary of a
boundary being equal to zero
(    0) [25].
Figure 6. Ordering the vertices as shown in
the figure induces an orientation on the
tetrahedrons two dimensional boundary, which
consists of four oriented triangles by (012) (013) + (023) - (123). This in turn induces an
orientation on the edges of the one
dimensional boundaries (01) - (02) + (12).
Summing the dimensional boundaries cancels
them in pairs [(01) - (01) = 0]. This is the
Bianchi identity described by the Regge
equations for parallel transport where the
boundary of a boundary is zero. Or
suggesting the tetrahedron is edgeless because
the 1D boundary of the 2D boundary of the
2D region is zero [25].
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
•
Laser Oscillated Vacuum Energy Resonator (LOVER). The ring laser (above) may be
built into an IC array of 1,000 ring lasers. If each microlaser in the array is designed
to be counterpropagating, an interference phenomena called the Sagnac Effect
occurs that violates special relativity in the small scale. This array of Sagnac Effect
ring lasers provides the top tier of the multi-tier LOVER. Inside the ring of each laser
is a cavity where quantum effects called Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics may occur
(C-QED). A special molecule is placed inside each cavity. If the ring laser array is RF
pulsed with resonant frequency modes applicable to the molecules electrons and
neutrons, by "Coherent Control of Cumulative Interaction" an inertial backreaction is
produced whereby the electrons having spin-spin coupling with the nucleons also
resonate with the spacetime backcloth in order to 'poke a hole' in it. Metaphorically
this is like dropping stones in a pool of water: One stone creates concentric ripples;
two stones create domains of constructive and destructive interference. Such an
event is not considered possible in the standard models of particle physics, quantum
theory and cosmology. However Noetic science uses extended versions of these
theories wherein a new teleological action principle may be utilized to develop what
might be called a 'transistor of the vacuum' which we have appropriately dubbed the
L.O.V.E.R. Just as standard transistors and copper wires provide the basis for almost
all modern electronic devices; This LOVER using the information content of
spacetime geodesics (lines) will soon be the basis of many forms of Noetic
Technologies.
DIRAC SPHERICAL ROTATION INHERENT TO
THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL
LEAST UNIT
Typically the Dirac dual spinor rotation applies to the
observation that an electron undergoes of rotation (not the
usual ) before returning to the initial orientation. Traditional
thinking has assumed this to be some property of matter. But
the discovery of the complex structure of spacetime has shown
that this is not a property fundamental to the electron; but
rather to the superspace the electron is imbedded in and part of.
Dirac spherical rotation as it is also called, is more
fundamentally a primary property of space than it is matter.
This is revealed in the complex hierarchical structure of the
least unit discussed in the paper.
DIRAC-NOETIC INTERFEROMETRY
MULTI-TIERED EXPERIMENTAL PLATFORM:
• Tunable Ring-Laser trap
• RF quadrupole pulsed Sagnac resonator – electron
resonance
• Phased Nucleon resonance for Haisch-Rueda type inertial
back reaction
• Cumulative Interaction – Cyclotron Resonance Power
Factor tears Hole in Spacetime and releases Noeon
References
[1] Amoroso, R.L., 2002, Developing the cosmology of a continuous state
universe, in R.L. Amoroso, G. Hunter, M. Kafatos & J-P Vigier (eds.),
Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale,
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[2] Amoroso, R.L. & Amoroso, P.J., 2002, The Primary mechanism initiating
protein conformation in infectious prion propagation, submitted.
[3] Bass, L., 1975, A quantum mechanical mind-body interaction, Foundations
of Physics, 5:1, 159-172.
[4] Dubrov, A.N., 1979, The interaction of biological objects with time and
space, in S.K. Krippner & M.L. Carlson (eds.) Psychoenergetic Systems,
New York: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers.
[5] Josephson, B.D. & Pallikari-Viras, F.,1991, Biological utilization of quantum
nonlocality, Foundations of Physics, 21:2, 197-207.
[6] Milner, R., 1993, Elements of interaction, Comm. of the ACM, 36:1, 78-89.
[7] Prigogine, I., Nicolis, G. & Babloyantz, A., 1972, Thermodynamics of
evolution, Physics Today, Nov. pp. 23-28, Dec. pp. 38-44.
[8] Prusiner, S.B. 1982, Science, 216,p. 136-144.
[9] Prusiner, S.B. 1998, Proc Nat. Acad. Sci, USA, 95, p. 13363-13383.
[10] Jantsch, E., 1984, The Self-Organizing Universe, New York: Pergamon.
[11] Varela, F.G., Maturana, H.R. & Uribe, R., 1974, Autopoiesis: The
organization of living systems, its characterization and a model, BioSystems,
5, 187-196.
References
[12] Wegner, P., 1998, Interactive foundations of computing, Theoretical
Computer Science, 192, 315-351.
[13] von Neumann, J., 1966, The theory of self-reproducing automata, in A.
Burks (ed.) Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
[14] Maturana, H. R., 1970, Biology of cognition, Report BCL 9.0 Urbana:
Biological Computer Laboratory, Univ. of Illinois.
[15] Amoroso R.L., 2003, Awareness: physical cosmology of the fundamental
least unit, Noetic Journal 4:1, 1-15; Amoroso R.L., 2003, What is
Consciousness, Introducing the Cosmology of Being, in Romanian N. Bulz
et al trans. (in Press); Amoroso R.L., 2003, in The Complementarity Of Mind
And Body: Essay’s Honoring The Centenary Of Nobelist Sir John Eccles, R.
L. Amoroso, B. J. Hiley & K. H. Pribram (eds.) In press.
[16] Ciubotariu, C & Ciubotariu, C. , 2002, A chaotic-stochastic model of an
atom, in R.L. Amoroso, G. Hunter, M. Kafatos & J-P Vigier (eds.), Gravitation
and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale, Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[17] Argyris, J. & Ciubotariu, C., 1999, A new physical effect modeled by an
Ikeda map depending on a monotonically time-varying parameter, Int. J. Bif.
Chaos, 9:1111-1120.
References
[18] Drãgãnescu, M., 1997, On the structural phenomenological theories of
consciousness, Noetic Journal, 1:1, 28-33.
[19] Haldane, J.S., 1923, Mechanism, Life and Personality, New York.
[20] Amoroso, R.L. 2000, The parameters of temporal correspondence in a
continuous state conscious universe, in R. Buccheri & M. Saniga (eds.)
Studies in the Structure of Time: From Physics to Psycho(patho)logy,
Dordrecht Kluwer Academic.
[21] Chalmers, D.J., 2002, The puzzle of conscious experience, Scientific
American Special, 12:1, 90-100.
[22] Beckner, M.O., 1972, Mechanism in biology, in P. Edwards (ed.) The
Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5, pp 250-2, New York: Collier Macmillan.
[23] Gould, L.I., 1995, Quantum dynamics and neural dynamics: Analogies
between the formalisms of Bohm and Pribram, in J. King & K.H. Pribram,
(eds.) Scale in Conscious Experience: Is the Brain Too Important to be Left
to Specialists to Study? 339-348, Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.
[24] Pribram, K.H., 1991, Brain and Perception: Holonomy and Structure in
Figural Processing, Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.
[25] Jibu, M. & K. Yasue, 1995, Quantum Brain Dynamics and Consciousness,
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
References
[26] Schrodinger, E., 1945, What is Life? London: Cambridge University Press.
Bohr, N., 1961, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
[27] Zhabotinsky, A.M., 1974, Self-oscillating Concentrations, Moscow: Nauka.
[28] Prigogine, I., 1973, Irreveresability as a symmetry breaking factor, Nature,
248: 67-71.
[29] Prigogine, I., Nicolis, G. & Babloyantz, A., 1972, Thermodynamics of
evolution, Physics Today, 25: 23-28 & 38-44.
[30] Brillouin, L., 1949, Life, thermodynamics and cybernetics, American
Scientist, 37: 554-568.
[31 ] Goldberg, J.N., 1981, Spacetime, in Encyclopedia of Physics, R.L. Lerner
& G.L. Trigg (eds.) Reading: Addison-Wesley.
[32] Frohlich, H., 1968, Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological
systems, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2:641-649.
[33 ] Jahn, R.G., 2001, The challenge of consciousness, J of Scientific
Exploration, 15:4, 443-457.
[34] Loudon, R. 1994, The Quantum Theory of Light, Oxford: Clarrendon
Press.
[35] Schutz, B. 1999, Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[36] Amoroso, R.L.,2003, Awareness: Physical Cosmology Of The
Fundamental Least Unit, Noetic Journal 4:1; 7-23.
References
[37] Amoroso, R.L. 2003, The Fundamental Limit and Origin of Biological
Systems, Noetic Journal 4:1; 24-32.
[38] Huang, Z., Gabriel, J-M, Baldwin, M.A., Fletterick, R.J., Prusiner, S.B., &
Cohen, F.E., 1994, Proposed three-dimensional structure for the cellular
prion protein, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, USA, 91, pp. 7139-7143.
[39] Prusiner, S.B. 1982, Science, 216,p. 136-144.
[40] Prusiner, S.B. 1998, Proc Nat. Acad. Sci, USA, 95, p. 13363-13383.
[41] Pruisiner, S.B., 2002, Research Summary,
www.ucsf.edu/neurosc/faculty/neuro-prusiner.html
[42] Kurschner, C. & Morgan, J.I. 1996, Mol. Brain Res. 37, pp. 249-258.
[43] Harper, J.D. & Lansbury, P.T. 1997, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 66, 385-407.
[44] Brown, P. et al., 1991, Lancet, 337, p. 1019-1022.
[45] Ueda, Y. & Akamatsu, N., 1981, Chaotically transitional phenomena in the
forced negative-resistance oscillator, IEEE Transactions on Circuits &
Systems, Vol. CAS-28, No. 3, 217-224.
[46] Lichtenberg, A.J. & Liebrman, M.A., 1983, Regular And Stochastic Motion,
Berlin: Springer.
[47] D. Humieres, D., Beasley, M.R., Huberman, B.A. & Libchaber, A., 1982,
Chaotic states and routes to chaos in the forced penduluum, Physical Rev A,
26:6, 3483-34
[48] Messiah p 26
30+ of my papers
may be found at:
www.mindspring.com/~noetic.advanced.studies
THAT’S ALL FOLKS!!!