Download No Slide Title

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup

Wave function wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Self-adjoint operator wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Compact operator on Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Density matrix wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Lecture 7: Expectation Values
The material in this lecture covers the following in Atkins.
11.5 The informtion of a wavefunction
(d) superpositions and expectation values
Lecture on-line
Expectation Values (PDF)
Expectation value (PowerPoint)
handouts
Assigned problems for lecture 7
Tutorials on-line
Reminder of the postulates of quantum mechanics
The postulates of quantum mechanics
(This is the writeup for Dry-lab-II)( This
lecture has covered postulate 5)
Basic concepts of importance for the understanding of the postulates
Observables are Operators - Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
Expectation Values - More Postulates
Forming Operators
Hermitian Operators
Dirac Notation
Use of Matricies
Basic math background
Differential Equations
Operator Algebra
Eigenvalue Equations
Extensive account of Operators
Historic development of quantum mechanics from classical mechanics
The Development of Classical Mechanics
Experimental Background for Quantum mecahnics
Early Development of Quantum mechanics
Audio-visuals on-line
Postulates of Quantum mechanics
(PDF) (simplified version from Wilson)
Postulates of Quantum mechanics
(HTML) (simplified version from Wilson)
Postulates of quantum mechanics
(PowerPoint ****)(simplified version from
Wilson)
Slides from the text book (From the CD included in Atkins ,**)
Operators and Expectation Values
Re view of average
calculations
Consider a large number N of
identical boxes with identical
particles all described by the
same wavefunction (x,t) :
Let us for each system at the same time meassure the property F
let the outcome of this meassurement be
f1, f2 , f3 , ........, fN
the average value for F is given by
N
 fk
<F > = k
N
k runs over number of meassurements
Operators and Expectation Values
Re view of average
calculations
Since N is large many experiments might give the same result.
Let n i be the times f i was observed. In this case we might also
wrire < F > as :
<F> =
1
 fj
Nj
1
=  nifi
Ni
j runs over all values i runs over different values
We might also write:
ni
< F > =  ( )fi   Pifi
i N
i
ni
Here Pi = ( ) is the probability of measuring the
N
value f i for F
Operators and Expectation Values
New apl. of
Born interp.
Let us now consider the x - coordinate in our N systems.
We have from the Born interpretation
probability of finding particle
Pi  P(x )  (x,t)* (x,t)dx between x and x + x
Thus the average value of x is given by

 x  =  P(x)x =  (x, t)x * (x, t)dx
x
-
Operators and Expectation Values
New apl. of
Born interp.
For a physical property that depends on the x, y,x
coordinates only : F(x,y,z)
The average value is given by
  
 F  =     * (x,y, z,t)F(x,y,z)(x,y,z, t)dxdydz
- - -
This is a simple extension
of the Born postulate
which is part of
Operators and Expectation Values New postulate 5.
A general property will depend on x,y,z as well as
the linear momenta px , py , pz .
F = F(x,y, z,px ,py ,p z )
We postulate :
  
 F  =    * (x,y, z,t)Fˆ (x,y, z,t)dxdydz
- - -
ˆ x,p
ˆ y , pˆ z )
Where Fˆ = Fˆ (x,y, z, p
Note : operator Fˆ is "sandwiched" between
 * and  .
the average value < F > is also called
an expectation value
Operators and Expectation Values New postulate 5.
Consider the special case where (x) is a
ˆ and Fˆ
simultanious eigenfunction to H
ˆ (x) = E(x)
H
; Fˆ (x) = k(x)
In this case

<F> = 
* (x)Fˆ  * (x)dx
-

1
= k   * (x) * (x)dx
=k
-
In this case a meassurement of F will always give k as an answer
Operators and Expectation Values New postulate 5.
Consider next the more general case where
 (x) as a statefunction is an eigenfunction to
ˆ but not to Fˆ
H
ˆ  (x) = E (x) ; Fˆ  (x)  k (x)
H
In this case the meassurement of F will
give one of the eigenvalues of F
Fi  k i i
The average value from a large number
of meassurements will be

ni
 F   ( )fi    * (x )Fˆ (x )
N
i

statistics (logic)
Postulate 5
Operators and Expectation Values

ni
 F   ( )fi    * (x )Fˆ (x )
N
i

Good question
about postulate 5.
What is the probability
n
Pi  ( i )
N
That the meassurement will have the outcome f i ?
the eigenfunctions i (i = 1,2,..)
Fi  k i i
forms a complete set on which we can expand our
statefunction  (x) :

 (x) =  aii (x ) : ai   f * (x )i (x )
i

Operators and Expectation Values

ni
 F   ( )fi    * (x )Fˆ (x )dx
N
i

Long answer to
good question
about postulate 5.
Now substituting the expression for the
expansion of the state function  (x ) in
terms of the eigenfunctions i to Fˆ

< F > =  (  ai*i* )Fˆ (  a j j )dx

i
j
Or after working with Fˆ on the sum to the right of Fˆ ,
and remember that Fˆ j  k j j

< F > =  (  ai*i* )(  a j k j j )dx

i
j
Operators and Expectation Values

< F > =  (  ai*i* )(  a j k j j )dx

i
Long answer to
good question
about postulate 5.
j
Now multiply each term in the right hand sum
with each term in the left hand sum

< F > =    (ai* i*a j k j j )dx
 i j
Interchanging next order of integration and summation,
which is allowed for 'well behaved sums' :

< F > =    (ai* i*a j k j j )dx
i j 
Operators and Expectation Values
Long answer to
good question
about postulate 5.

< F > =    (ai* i*a j k j j )dx
i j 
Taking constant factors outside integration sign
<F > =

*
  ai a j k j  i* j dx
i j

Making use of th orthonormality of
eigenfunctions

< F > =   ai*a j k j  i* j dx
i j

< F > =  ai*ai k i   | ai |2 k i
i
i
ij

*
 i j dx  ij

Operators and Expectation Values
By comparing
< F > =  ai*ai k i   | ai |2 k i
i
Long answer to
good question
about postulate 5.
i
with

ni
 F   ( )fi    * (x )Fˆ (x )
N
i

ni
we note that | ai | 
N
2
probability of obtaining ki from
a meassurement of F in state
with state function  (x)

We have that ai    * (x)i (x)dx

Thus the chance of obtaining k i from a meassurement
of F for a system with state function  (x) is large
if the 'overlap' between (x) and i (x) is large
Operators and Expectation Values
We have that (x) is normalized

Long answer to
good question
about postulate 5.

* *

(x
)

(x
)dx

[
a



i i (x ) ][  a j j (x )]dx  1
*
- i
-
j
or after multiplying out the sum and interchange
summation and integration


* *

(x
)

(x
)dx

a



 i  i (x )a j j (x )dx  1
-
*
i
j
-
Operators and Expectation Values
finally using the orthonormality properties of the set {i ,i  1,2..}

  
i
j
ai* * i (x )a j j
-
(x )dx   
i
j
ai*a j

*

 i (x )j (x )dx  1
-
or :  | ai |2  1  sum of all probabilities
i
ij
Thus the sum of the individual probabilities ai (i = 1,2,..)for
obtaining the values fi (i = 1,2,..) in a meassurement of F
for a system with the statefunction (x) is one as it should;
if  (x) is normalized
Operators and Quantum Mechanics
ikx
ikx
 (x)  exp  exp
is a linear combination
of two eigenfunctions to pˆ x
px  k
How can we find
px in this case ?
50 % chance to
measure p = k
50 % chance to
measure p = - k
 Px  0
px   k
2k 2
p2
E

2m
2m
What you should learn from this lecture
1. Postulate 2 (Review)
For any observable (x,y, x , px , py ,pz ) that can
be expressed in classical physics in terms of x, y, x
and px , py , pz . We can construct the corresponding
ˆ ( xˆ , yˆ , xˆ , pˆ x , pˆ y , pˆ z )
quantum mechanical operator operator 
from the substitution:
Classical Mechanics Quantum Mechanics
x
px
y
py
z
pz
ˆ (x,y,z,
as 

xˆ   x ; pˆ x  
i x

yˆ   y ; pˆ y  
i y

zˆ   z ; pˆ z  
i z
d
d
d
,
,
)
i dx i dy i dz
What you should learn from this lecture
2. Postulate 3 (Review)
ˆ
The meassurement of the quantity represented by 
has as the o n l y outcome one of the eigenvalues  n n = 1,2, 3 ....
ˆ  n  n  n
to the eigenvalue equation : 
3. Postulate 5.
For a system in a state described by (x, y, z, t)
the average value meassured for  will be
  
ˆ
ˆ (x,y, z, t)dxdydz
 
=    * (x,y, z, t)
- - -
We call that the expectation value.
4. For a system in a state described by (x, y, z, t) the
probability to obtain the value  n in a meassurement of 
  
2
is | a n | where a n =    * (x,y, z, t) ndxdydz
- - -
ˆ n   n n and  n
Here  n is an eigenvalue to 
the corresponding eigenfunction