Download Yang Dan

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Temporal Specificity in the
Cortical Plasticity of Visual
Space Representation
Interdisciplinary Program in Brain Science
Eye Movement & Vision Research LAB
Hwang, Jae Won
http://www.pgd.hawaii.edu/~cecily/courses/gg313/DA_book/node94.html
Cross Correlation
• Autocorrelation is the correlation between two copies of
the same time-series.
• Autocorrelations can be high for large lags if the data “repeats”.
http://www.pgd.hawaii.edu/~cecily/courses/gg313/DA_book/node95.html
Cross Correlation(cont’d)
• Cross Correlation is to compare two different time series at
various lags rather than two identical series.
• From cross correlation we would expect to learn
two things:
1) The strength of the relationship between the two series
2) The lag that maximizes the coherence
Spike Timing-dependent Plasticity
• A→B stimulation may
strengthen a→b connections
weaken b→a connections
• Synaptic modifications induced by
A→B stimuli may cause the receptive
fields of both groups to shift toward A.
• The shift toward A of receptive fields
should cause a rightward shift in
perception.
Spike Timing of Cortical Neurons
Cross Correlation of Model Neurons
Changes induced by Conditioning
• Intragroup Correlation
Changes induced by Conditioning(cont’d)
• Intergroup Correlation
Shifts in Receptive Fields
Human Perception Localization
• Conditioning-induced shifts in
human perceptual localization.
• Three-bar bisection test
Conclusion
• Asynchronous visual stimuli in different retinal regions induced rapid
changes in cortical representation of visual space, which was likely
mediated by spike timing-dependent modification of intracortical
connections.
• Spike timing-dependent modification of intracortical connections
provides the most natural explanation, although mechanisms related to
contrast adaptation may have caused the conditioning-induced reduction
in receptive field size.