Download Proofs, Recursion and Analysis of Algorithms

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Law of large numbers wikipedia , lookup

Infinity wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Central limit theorem wikipedia , lookup

Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

List of first-order theories wikipedia , lookup

Quadratic reciprocity wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup

Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

List of prime numbers wikipedia , lookup

List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Arithmetic wikipedia , lookup

Number theory wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Sets, Combinatorics, Probability, and
Number Theory
Mathematical Structures
for Computer Science
Chapter 3
Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.
MSCS Slides
Probability
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARITHMETIC
For every integer n  2, n is a prime number or can be
written uniquely (ignoring ordering) as a product of
prime numbers.
We ignore the order in which we write the factors:
2(3)(3) = 3(2)(3)

If a and b are positive integers, then gcd(a,b) can
always be written as a linear combination of a and b,
that is, gcd(a,b) = ia + jb for some integers i and j.

Section 3.7
gcd(420,66) = 6 = 3(420)  19(66)
Number Theory
1
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

The values 3 and 19 in gcd(420,66) = 3(420)  19(66)
are derived from the successive divisions done by the
Euclidean algorithm:
420 = 6 * 66 + 24
66 = 2 * 24 + 18
24 = 1 * 18 + 6
18 = 3 * 6 + 0

Rewriting the first three equations from the bottom up:
6 = 24 * 1 + 18
18 = 66 * 2 + 24
24 = 420 * 6 + 66

Now we use these equations in a series of substitutions:
6 = 24  1 * 18 = 24  1 * (66  2 * 24) (substituting for 18)
= 3 * 24  66
= 3 * (420  6 * 66)  66 (substituting for 24)
= 3 * 420  19 * 66
Section 3.7
Number Theory
2
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

THEOREM ON gcd(a, b)
Given positive integers a and b, gcd(a,b) is the linear
combination of a and b that has the smallest positive
value.
From the theorem on gcd(a,b), it follows that a and b
are relatively prime if and only if there exist integers i
and j such that:
ia + jb = 1
DEFINITION: RELATIVELY PRIME
Two integers a and b are relatively prime if gcd(a,b)
1.
Section 3.7
Number Theory
3
Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

THEOREM ON DIVISION BY PRIME
NUMBERS
Let p be a prime number such that p  ab, where a and
b are integers. Then, either p  a or p  b.
To find the unique factorization of 825 as a product of
primes, we can start by simply dividing 825 by
successively larger primes:
825 = 3 * 275 = 3 * 5 * 55 = 3 * 5 * 5 * 11 = 3 * 52 * 11

Doing the same on 455:
455 = 5 * 7 * 13

Section 3.7
From these factorizations, we can see that gcd(825,
455) = 5.
Number Theory
4
More on Prime Numbers

Section 3.7
THEOREM ON SIZE OF PRIME FACTORS
If n is a composite number, then it has a prime factor
less than or equal to (n)1/2.
Given n = 1021, let’s find the prime factors of n or
determine that n is prime. The value of (1021)1/2 is just
less than 32. So the primes we need to test are 2, 3, 5,
7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31. None divides 1021, so
1021 is prime.
Number Theory
5
More on Prime Numbers



Section 3.7
THEOREM ON INFINITY OF PRIMES
(EUCLID)
There is an infinite number of prime numbers.
Assume that there is a finite number of primes. Let the
value of s = the sum of all primes + 1. Therefore, s is
not prime. Thus, s is composite and by the
fundamental theorem of arithmetic, s can be factored
as a product of (some of) the prime numbers.
Suppose that pj is one of the prime factors of s, that is,
s = pj (m) for some integer m. Then:
1 = s – p1 p2 … pk = pj(m)  p1 p2 … pk
= pj (m  p1 … pj  1 pj + 1 …pk)
Therefore, pj  1, which is a contradiction.
Number Theory
6
Euler Phi Function

DEFINITION: EULER PHI FUNCTION
For n an integer, n  2, the Euler (pronounced
“oiler”) phi function of n, (n), is the number of
positive integers less than or equal to n and relatively
prime to n. ((n) is pronounced “fee” of n.)
For example:






Section 3.7
(2) = 1 (the number 1)
(3) = 2 (the numbers 1, 2)
(4) = 2 (the numbers 1, 3)
(5) = 4 (the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4)
(6) = 2 (the numbers 1, 5)
(7) = 6 (the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
Number Theory
7