Download Strengthening the link between policymakers and

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Economics and
Governance of NGOs in
Bangladesh
Hassan Zaman
The World Bank
Study objectives

Improve knowledge, and reduce misperceptions, of NGO
sector within Bangladesh by providing facts on key
services and advocacy activities provided by NGOs

Explore trends and implications of different ways of
financing NGOs

Examine legal and regulatory framework for NGOs

Suggest steps that Government, donors and NGOs
could each take to strengthen the development impact of
NGO activity
A few facts






Around 2000 “development NGOs”, most operate in less than 5
districts
Rapid growth in NGO programs; proportion of rural communities
with at least one NGO program almost doubled 1995-2000
A World Bank survey of 300 NGO branches in 2004 shows that
micro-credit, health, sanitation and education are the four most
common services. Another common activity is pro-poor advocacy
Micro-credit reaches around 60% of poor households, and 37%
of total households – but regional coverage uneven.
Certain health programs have nationwide reach through
community health workers but health facilities are surprisingly
scarce (e.g. only 4% of women obtained post-natal care from
NGO facilities)
Around 8% of total primary enrolment are in NGO schools – of
these 75% are in BRAC schools
Reaching the poor

NGOs are reasonably successful in targeting services to
the poor (small share of non-poor get benefits)
 Primary education is a good example (HIES 2000)
1%
100%
90%
18%
15%
28%
14%
80%
70%
50%
25%
30%
20%
10%
27%
23%
40%
49%
27%
25%
60%
Fifth quintile
16%
Fourth quintile
Third quintile
23%
20%
19%
Second quintile
20%
17%
14%
44%
14%
12%
10%
19%
10%
10%
0%
Go vernment
Go vt
Subsidized
N GO o perated
M adrasa
P rivate and
Others
First quintile
Socio-economic impact

On individual and household level benefits there is clear
evidence of positive NGO impact on a range of key
outcome goals (see micro-finance presentation later)

For instance impact of NGO schools on test scores is
highly significant (compared to girls who don’t go to
school, NGO girl students have 22% higher reading
scores compared to 8% higher for GOB schools)

NGO presence in a village contributes to a 20% point
difference in malnutrition rates probably due to the
interaction effect of micro-credit on consumption,
nutritional education and nutritional supplements.

On cost-effectiveness, there is evidence that certain key
programs e.g. TB, micro-credit and primary schooling,
are most cost-effective when delivered by NGOs.
Advocacy issues

Most NGO advocacy focuses on issues directly affecting
the poor (violence, land rights etc) with numerous
successful examples of pro-poor change

A number of NGOs are involved in issues that challenge
Government policies more directly (e.g. anti-corruption,
human rights)

Recently a few NGOs were accused of involvement in
partisan politics.

NGOs that provide services and are engaged in
advocacy on contentious issues may consider formally
separating the 2 functions into different legal entities so
that funding for service provision is protected.
Success factors: an understated GOB role

Several factors have led to unparalleled size and
development impact (leadership, funding,
geographical/social homogeneity). One key factor is role
of Government. Compared to other countries GOB has
provided far greater space for NGO activity.

Macro-economic stability and sustained growth has
contributed to the success of micro-finance. Partnership
programs in key sectors (e.g. total sanitation, TB) have
explicitly involved NGOs, PRSP confirms this. Fiscal
policy has been supportive.

Recent tensions need to be seen in this broader context.
Success factors: pay and incentives

Internal incentives for staff performance rests largely on
close supervision of staff attendance (helped by campusstyle living arrangements), easily monitorable targets,
ability to dismiss workers easily, and reasonably
participatory decision-making. Performance-linked pay in
certain programs help.

On other hand frontline NGO worker pay is on average
lower than GOB counterparts, compression ratios similar
resulting in high staff turnover in certain professions e.g.
doctors. Moreover staff altruism is over-rated especially
for “second generation workers.”
Financing NGOs - external sources
Total aid to NGO has remained stable at around 0.7% of GDP –
this is during a period when total aid to Bangladesh has fallen
from 5% of GDP (1990-95) to 3% of GDP since 1995.
Total ODA, Funding to NGOs and Share of GDP
2,000
30.0
Total aid to Government
500
Aid as share of
GDP
15.0
Total aid to NGOs
0
10.0
5.0
0.0
%
20.0
19
90
19 91
91
19 92
92
19 93
93
19 -94
94
19 95
95
19 96
96
19 97
97
19 98
9
19 8 99 99
-2
0
20 0 0
00
20 01
01
20 02
02
-0
3
US$ million
25.0
1,500 Share of aid
to NGOs
1,000
Financing NGOs - external sources
Contd…

Corruption has plagued Government financing of NGOs
in social sectors.

However in micro-finance (PKSF) and solar energy
(IDCOL) contracting has been successful.

Once contracting processes are improved (e.g. through
autonomous foundations), greater social sector NGO
delivery could go via Budget.

Private charitable contributions have not been tapped by
development NGOs
Self-generated funds

Interest income on micro-finance key source (see next
presentation)

NGO-linked commercial enterprises common in other
countries typically as separate legal entities

Here NGO businesses are registered under numerous
laws resulting in controversy with private sector

Profitability of NGO businesses varies by sector and
by NGO capacity to hire business professionals.

Decisions to enter and exit markets need to be done
depending on whether the objective is to be a ‘social
venture capitalist’ or to maximize revenues
Regulatory framework and financial
accountability

Legal framework (registration, oversight, tax) outdated
and the multiple implementing agencies lack capacity.

Laws relating to internal governance, accounting,
disclosure and transparency are rudimentary

NGO Boards face similar corporate governance
problems as corporate sector (family members, lack of
term limits, lack of role clarity)

Donor financial reporting requirements are
questionable

Quality of external audits and public access to reports
vary significantly
Regulatory framework and financial
accountability Contd…

Uniform accounting standards using IAS, oversight
system for audit quality through proposed Financial
Reporting Council and public access to audit reports
would help

Board composition and functions could be strengthened
in line with Code of Corporate Governance

An Independent NGO Commission is one option for
improving institutional framework

Certification bodies, as in Philippines and Pakistan, can
screen out fly by night NGOs

Legislative revision carries risks as does current status
quo.
Scaling up through a strategic compact

NGOs have made a difference for their clients but the
macro impact of NGO programs is limited by the ‘micro’
nature of some of these interventions (e.g. growth impact
of micro-credit, less than 10% of primary enrolment, few
facility based health services).

Strong case for a focused scaling up of NGO activity
through a mix of enhanced direct provision and
facilitating (local) Government and community provision
so that accountability relationships are strengthened
Scaling up through a strategic compact
Contd…

Existing ‘franchising model’ of expansion remains basis
for growth though future products will be more complex

Middle management capacity, retaining incentives, costeffectiveness and leadership succession are key
challenges as NGOs deliver more complex services.

A ‘strategic compact’ between GOB, donors, NGOs and
clients where each improves certain aspects of its
current practices could further enhance development
impact of NGOs
Scaling up through a strategic compact
Contd…

GOB part of compact could be (i) to oversee NGOs while
not impairing their ability to innovate (ii) withdraw from
direct service provision where NGOs have comparative
advantage (e.g. micro-credit) (iii) strengthen
procurement and budgetary practices to improve
contracting and evaluation of NGOs

Donor role in ‘compact’ could be to support NGOs while
ensuring that accountability of NGOs to Bangladeshi
stakeholders is preserved. As contracting processes
improve more donor funds to NGOs, for social services,
could go via Budget. Advocacy needs to be funded
directly.
Scaling up through a strategic compact
Contd…

NGO part of the compact could include (i) strengthening
financial management and corporate governance (ii)
improving transparency and active publicity about
activities and finances (iii) carrying out strategic reviews
to determine scaling up or down of programs/enterprises
(iv) strengthening middle management and succession
planning

Clients can contribute to the compact by actively
exercising their power as consumers (eg vouchers), by
monitoring service quality and demanding information