Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PARISH Old Bolsover __________________________________________________________________________ APPLICATION LOCATION APPLICANT APPLICATION NO. CASE OFFICER DATE RECEIVED Single storey extension to front 1 Limestone Cottages Oxcroft Lane Stanfree Chesterfield Mr Steve Shearwood 13/00408/FUL FILE NO. H2669 Mr Steve Kimberley 10th September 2013 DELEGATED APPLICATION __________________________________________________________________________ SITE The property is an existing stone dwelling with domestic curtilage to the south set on land which is designated as open countryside in the adopted Local Plan. The property is two storey with accommodation in the roof space and a single storey offshoot to the west. The property has a slate roof but UPVC windows. To the north is an attached two storey stone dwelling with another dwelling beyond that. To the south is the garden of the property partly set to grass beyond which is a large recently built timber triple garage. There is a timber built summerhouse close to the position of the proposed extension. There is a 1.2m high stone wall to the frontage of the site the majority of which has shrubs planted behind which raise the screening to approx 1.7m. PROPOSAL The proposal is for a single storey extension positioned to the front of the property at its western end. The main part of the extension would be 5m wide and have a total length of 8.4m. To enable it to connect to the existing building an extra 1.85m x 2.6m glazed roofed link is also provided. The ridge height of the extension would be 5m. The extension would be built of stone and slate to match the existing property. The windows would not be traditional but are shown on the plans as full height folding style. The application form gives no further details. In addition the extension would have a wood burning stove and associated flue on the eastern facing slope of the roof protruding just over the ridge of the extension. A small wooden summer house would be removed to make way for the new proposal. AMENDMENTS Amendments received on the 20th November moving the extension further to the west and providing a glazed link between the extension and the existing property. Further revisions received on the 29th November amending further the glazed link so that it now has a stone pillar at the corner in order to give better structural strength and ease the method of construction. HISTORY (if relevant) 09/00429/FUL – Demolition of existing garage and erection of triple garage and workshop. Approved 26/10/2009 CONSULTATIONS Derbyshire County Council Highway Authority – No objections 26/09/2013 Old Bolsover Town Council – Leave to the District Council to determine. 08/10/2013 Conservation Officer – Verbal comments received regarding the latest revisions showing the glazed link with stone pillar, stating no objections subject to conditions requiring further details of doors and materials and 1:20 detailed cross sections of linkages between materials on the glazed link 04/12/2013 PUBLICITY Site notice posted and two neighbouring properties notified. No representations received. POLICY Bolsover District Local Plan (BDLP) GEN1 (Minimum requirements for development) GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) ENV3 (Development in the Countryside) National Planning Policy Framework Para 135 The effect of an application on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset should be taken into account in determining the application. In weighing applications that affect directly or indirectly non designated heritage assets, a balanced judgement will be required having regard to the scale of any harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset. Other (specify) Interim Supplementary Planning Document – Successful Places: A Guide to Sustainable Housing Layout and Design ASSESSMENT The main issues for consideration are the impact of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the impact on the historic interest of the building. The building is a two storey stone built former farmhouse which was once part of a courtyard arrangement of buildings the majority of which were sited to the north. The property is of some age and built in a traditional form in stone with a slate roof. Whilst there is a more recent extension (turn of 20th Century) to the side the building itself is typical of a high class farmhouse in the area. The property is not listed nor have any buildings in this area been designated as unlisted building of merits. There is little doubt however that if an assessment of buildings had taken place this building would have been designated as an unlisted building of merit. This has been confirmed by the Conservation Officer. For the purposes of this assessment the building is considered to be a non-designated historic asset. Paragraph 135 states that the effect of the application on the significance of a non designated heritage asset shall be taken into account in the determination. The property is semi detached forming one part of what is likely to have been a larger farmhouse. The other part is positioned on the northern side of the dwelling creating a separate dwelling. The southern facing elevation is considered to be then principal elevation of this property which now sits gable on to the road. This principal elevation has a small single storey extension on the western side of the property. The proposal was originally sited to cover approx 50% of this single storey extension but has been since modified so that the current proposal is for an extension which effectively is only just attached to the main property. The access to the proposal is from the main dwelling via a glazed link corridor. This area of glazing ensures that the extension looks even more like a separate element and ensures that the main views of the principal elevation still remain. The latest revisions include for practical purposes a stone pillar on the corner but this would blend into the background when viewed from the highway. Details of how the junction of glazed walls, glazed roof and stone pier will work are not found on the plans in any clarity and it is considered that further details are required but can be asked for by condition. The main materials of the building, stone and slate are to match the existing. Conditions can be imposed to ensure samples are submitted so that the materials are a close match. There is also a flue on the building but this is on the rear elevation and only the very top will be visible in the street scene. It is not considered to have a significant impact on the character or appearance of the area but should be conditioned to have a black finish to minimise further the impacts. No details are given of the folding doors to the extension and it is considered that a condition should be imposed requiring details in order to retain control over this detail. The proposal will be easily seen from the highway but because of the glazed link will appear more as a stone outbuilding albeit with large glazed panels. Whilst the historic asset value of the main dwelling is noted it is not a designated asset and it is considered that the impacts of the building as revised are not so great as to warrant a refusal. Other Matters Though the new extension is effectively to the front of the main property it is away from any highways and will not have any impacts on visibility splays. The proposal does not have any impact on any parking or turning areas and is not considered to have any impact on highway safety. The Highway Authority, Derbyshire County Council, has been consulted on the proposal and has no objections. The proposal is considered to be in compliance with policy GEN1 (Minimum requirements for development) of the adopted Local Plan in this regard. The building will not introduce any significant privacy or overlooking issues or cause any loss of light to adjacent properties and is considered as acceptable and meets the requirements of policy GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) in this regard. Listed Building: Conservation Area: Crime and Disorder: Equalities: Access for Disabled: Trees (Preservation and Planting): SSSI Impacts: Biodiversity: Human Rights: RECOMMENDATION not applicable not applicable no known issues No specific equalities issues identified. not applicable no known issues not applicable not applicable not applicable Grant subject to the following conditions: 1) 2) 3) 4) A101 G110 G106 Prior to construction of the glazed link herby permitted detailed drawings at a scale of no less than 1:20 showing the junctions between the glazed panels and the glazing and the stone pier shall be first agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. 5) Prior to the installation of the folding doors n the new extension details of those doors including materials and finish shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. 6) The flue on the rear of the building shall have a matt black finish unless otherwise approved by the Local Planning Authority Reasons 1) Y101 2) Y132 – GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) 3) Y132 – GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) 4) Y155 – GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) 5) Y155 – GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) 6) Y132 – GEN2 (Impact of the development on the Environment) __________________________________________________________________________ Officer S Kimberley Endorsing Officer Determining Officer C Doy Date 10/12/2013 Date (refusals/objections/ referrals to 3rd officer) Date 11/12/13