Download Cleavage Close to the End of DNA Fragments (linearized

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

DNA polymerase wikipedia , lookup

United Kingdom National DNA Database wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Microsatellite wikipedia , lookup

Replisome wikipedia , lookup

Zinc finger nuclease wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Cleavage Close to the End of DNA Fragments (linearized vector)
Linearized vectors were incubated with the indicated enzymes (10 units/µg) for 60 minutes at the recommended
incubation temperature and NEBuffer for each enzyme. Following ligation and transformation, cleavage efficiencies were
determined by dividing the number of transformants from the digestion reaction by the number obtained from religation of
the linearized DNA (typically 100–500 colonies) and subtracting from 100%. “Base Pairs from End” refers to the number of
double-stranded base pairs between the end of the recognition site and the terminus of the fragment; this number does
not include the single-stranded overhang from the initial cut. Since it has not been demonstrated whether these singlestranded nucleotides contribute to cleavage efficiency, 4 bases should be added to the indicated numbers when designing
PCR primers. Average efficiencies were rounded to the nearest whole number; experimental variation was typically within
10%.
Note: This data represents the minimum number of bases that will work, but is not recommended for
maximum cleavage. As a general rule, enzymes not listed below require 6 bases pairs on either side of their
recognition site to cleave efficiently.
|A|B|E|H|K|M|N|P|S|X|
Enzyme
AatII
Acc65I
AflII
AgeI
ApaI
AscI
AvrII
BamHI
BglII
BsiWI
BspEI
BsrGI
BssHII
EagI
EcoRI
EcoRV
HindIII
KasI
KpnI
MluI
MunI
NcoI
NgoMIV
Base pairs
from End
3
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
%Cleavage
Efficiency
88
100
95
99
75
13
100
100
100
97
100
97
100
100
100
8
99
88
100
100
100
88
100
100
90
91
0
97
93
100
100
99
99
100
100
100
Vector
Initial Cut
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 28
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
pNEB193
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 38
pNEB193
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 28
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
pNEB193
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 28
LITMUS 39
NcoI
NcoI
PinAI
SpeI
SacI
StuI
XbaI
AatII
SpeI
BamHI
SacI
HindIII
NsiI
BssHII
BsrGI
BsrGI
SphI
BspEI
BsiWI
NheI
XhoI
PstI
NheI
PstI
NcoI
NcoI
BamHI
NgoMIV
HindIII
SpeI
SacI
SacI
EagI
NgoMIV
HindIII
MunI
NheI
NotI
NsiI
PacI
PmeI
PstI
SacI
SalI
SfiI*
SpeI
SphI
XbaI
XhoI
XmaI
1
2
7
4
1
3
3
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
3
2
1
9
4
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
100
82
100
100
98
100
77
95
76
94
98
50
37
99
89
23
61
81
97
93
100
100
99
97
92
99
94
97
98
92
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 39
Bluescript SKBluescript SKBluescript SKLITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 28
pNEB193
pNEB193
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 39
LITMUS 38
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
LITMUS 29
pNEB193
pNEB193
* A modified version of LITMUS 38 with an introduced SfiI site was used for this test.
EcoRI
EagI
SpeI
KspI
XbaI
BssHII
BglII
BssHII
BamHI
PstI
EcoRV
HindIII
EcoRI
AvrII
SpeI
SphI
SphI
BamHI
MluI
EcoRI
Acc65I
KpnI
SalI
BsrGI
SalI
AgeI
PinAI
EcoRI
AscI
BssHII