Download Dixie Betrayed: How the South Really Lost the Civil War

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Anaconda Plan wikipedia , lookup

First Battle of Bull Run wikipedia , lookup

List of American Civil War generals wikipedia , lookup

Battle of Fort Pillow wikipedia , lookup

Texas in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Virginia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Tennessee in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Jubal Early wikipedia , lookup

Conclusion of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Pacific Coast Theater of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Capture of New Orleans wikipedia , lookup

Alabama in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Opposition to the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Blockade runners of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Border states (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup

Confederate States of America wikipedia , lookup

Redeemers wikipedia , lookup

Confederate privateer wikipedia , lookup

Economy of the Confederate States of America wikipedia , lookup

South Carolina in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Commemoration of the American Civil War on postage stamps wikipedia , lookup

Georgia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Union (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup

Military history of African Americans in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Lost Cause of the Confederacy wikipedia , lookup

Mississippi in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

United Kingdom and the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Issues of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Dixie Betrayed: How the South Really Lost the Civil War
by David J. Eicher
The War Between the States was fought, not over slavery, but over states’
rights. Dixie Betrayed: How the South Really Lost the Civil War by David J.
Eicher, explains how states’ rights actually helped the South go down to
defeat. The Confederacy felt that the states were to be sovereign, ruling
themselves, while the Union had a strong central government.
President Jefferson Davis knew the South’s view on government would not
win their independence and that a central government would be more
powerful in that it could control its military and the states whenever there
was a state of emergency. Southern governors and states’ rights supporters
opposed him and some even threatened to secede from the Confederacy
because they did not support his views. This is why the author sets forth
the idea that strong support of states’ rights was the actual betrayal and
downfall of the Confederacy.
The author delves into the constant battle between President Davis and the
Confederate Congress over appointments of military officers, cabinet
members and officials and over his efforts to introduce new ideas, such as a
Supreme Court, which they vehemently opposed, as he attempted to
establish a more centralized government in the South. Fighting among
politicians and military leaders is discussed and their backstabbing is
explored. Groups of officers formed either in support of or opposed to
President Davis and his policies, which is strictly human nature, but aided in
the Union’s victory. There was little solidarity among the Southern political
leaders of the day.
The South desperately considered conscripting slaves toward the end of the
war, not to fight, but to support those who were fighting. The Confederates
had no reserves and the states hesitated to send their state militias to help
fight, as they felt they were needed to defend their home states where the
war was happening right in their own back yards. As a result, if soldiers
assigned to the state militia did serve, they had to remain in their home
state which caused shortages and problems for the Army when they moved.
Jefferson knew and understood the opposition he had faced within the
Confederacy and its state governments during the war and, because of his
knowledge and leadership, he gained the respect of the majority of
Southerners following the war. Many southern military leaders; however,
wrote memoirs of the war, histories, and autobiographies of the wartime
experiences to which the author credits referring to the war as the “lost
cause”. He states that many attempted to cover their shortfalls and ultimate
loss of the war by accusing others. Many of them continued fighting with
each other for the rest of their lives through articles and books, thus they
continued to betray the Confederacy.
The book includes illustrations and photographs of important people of the
Confederacy. It also tells what happened to some of the most notable
Confederate leaders following the War.
The book is well written and informative and places the cause of the War
Between the States exactly where it belongs with the battle over states’
rights. It is, however, disheartening to a Southerner to read an author’s
work in which he states that their own leaders betrayed Dixie’s Land.
Reviewed by Celeste T. Young, MS Division Historian
14 May 2009