* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Optical frequency standard
Ellipsometry wikipedia , lookup
Super-resolution microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Confocal microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Photon scanning microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Retroreflector wikipedia , lookup
Spectrum analyzer wikipedia , lookup
Fiber-optic communication wikipedia , lookup
Photonic laser thruster wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup
Optical amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Optical rogue waves wikipedia , lookup
Passive optical network wikipedia , lookup
Silicon photonics wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
3D optical data storage wikipedia , lookup
Interferometry wikipedia , lookup
Harold Hopkins (physicist) wikipedia , lookup
Optical tweezers wikipedia , lookup
Optical coherence tomography wikipedia , lookup
Optical frequency standard Brief description of the research The objective of this work is the realization of an all-optical ultra-stable microwave oscillator based on the transfer of ultra-low noise signals between the optical range (ultra-stable laser) and the microwave domain using an optical frequency comb. Detailed description Introduction Quite generally, frequency standards with a high oscillation frequency profit from a better stability than those with lower oscillation frequencies. Although optical sources are used for some functionalities (optical pumping, laser cooling of atoms), all present primary and secondary frequency standards are "microwave-based” as they probe an atomic transition whose frequency belongs to the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum (1-10 GHz or 109-1010 Hz). Moving from a microwave standard to an optical standard, in which the frequency belongs to the optical spectrum (frequency in the range of 100 THz or 1014 Hz), will enable us to bridge a gap of ~5 orders of magnitude on oscillation frequency; this offers a strong potential of improvement in terms of the stability of the standard. Optical frequency comb Since optical frequencies are extremely high, they cannot be directly measured by frequency counting. No optical detector is able to measure 1014 Hz, which is in sharp contrast to microwave frequencies, where detectors for multi-GHz operation are commercially available. Until recently, it was thus nearly impossible to precisely measure optical frequencies, as required for instance for the definition of the second. There were only a handful of institutions worldwide being capable of performing such experiments. They used an extremely complicated infrastructure involving about ten stages of non-linear optical and microwave elements. These elements were necessary to bridge the large frequency ratio between a microwave cesium transition and optical frequencies. Such a “harmonic frequency chain” occupied an area of the size of several large rooms and was run by a considerable number of specialized personnel. The discovery of optical frequency combs in 1999 by T. Hänsch and J. Hall (Nobel prize in Physics in 2005) has revolutionized optical frequency metrology. An optical frequency comb can be regarded like a ruler containing 105 – 106 equidistant optical frequencies. This ruler can directly and very precisely relate optical frequencies (THz-PHz or 1012-1015 Hz) to microwave frequencies (GHz or 109-1010 Hz). It allows us therefore to establish a direct and highly exact relation between microwave atomic clocks and optical frequencies. An optical frequency comb consists of an ultra-short pulse (<100 fs) laser source with a fixed repetition frequency (0.1-1 GHz). The shorter the pulses used, the larger becomes the spectral coverage of the optical comb. With 100 fs pulses, one typically gets to 200 nm spectral width around 1550 nm. Applications of optical frequency combs The optical frequency comb allows us the find an exact relation between optical frequencies and microwave frequencies or vice-versa. This technique has various interesting applications: Ultra-stable microwave oscillator An important activity of the LTF in the domain of optical frequency standards concerns the generation of an ultra-stable microwave signal using an all-optical approach. The basic idea is to transfer the relative stability of an extremely stable laser (∆ν/ν = 10-15 in a second) from the optical into the microwave domain. This will be done using an optical comb by “division” of the optical frequency with a large cardinal number, approximately N = 100’000. The goal of this approach is the replacement of the currently used hydrogen maser; an operation which would be advantageous regarding cost as well as short and mid-term (t < 1’000 seconds) stability performance. The relative stability goal is 10-15 in one second. In order to achieve such a high performance level, an ultra-stable laser is required. Stabilization of the laser will be done by locking it to a narrow cavity resonance of a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity (F > 100’000) using the Pound-Drever-Hall method. While this locking would be excellent for short term stability, locking to a molecular transition will minimize long term drifts. This stabilization scheme will result in a laser linewidth reduction down to several Hz and a considerable decrease of the frequency noise. Since the short term stability of the laser is directly linked to the mirror distance of the Fabry-Perot cavity, the latter itself should be as stable as possible. This requirement imposes severe constraints on the design of the cavity mounting. More specifically, we will use a mirror spacer made from ultralow expansion (ULETM) glass which will be supported at only four carefully chosen points; this measure will minimize mechanical deformations due to gravitational effects. In addition, the cavity will be placed in a thermal shield thereby minimizing radiative and convective heat exchange with the walls of the surrounding vacuum chamber. The vacuum chamber, finally, is at a pressure on the order of 10-8 mbar and placed on an anti-vibration table. A first, more traditional approach for the realization of such an ultra-stable microwave generator consists in locking one tooth of the optical comb directly on the ultra-stable laser at 1.55 µm: ν N = N ⋅ f rep + f 0 = ν laser ⇒ f rep = (ν laser − f 0 )/ N . This technique necessitates a self-referenced frequency comb, in which the offset frequency f0 is measured and stabilized. In order to stabilize f0 using the so-called 1f:2f interferometry method, the optical comb must cover more than one octave of the electromagnetic spectrum, which in turn requires a relatively complicated experimental setup using non-linear fiber amplifiers. In order to avoid this complication, a different approach will be studied in parallel. It consists of difference frequency generation (DFG). This is a non-linear three wave process, where the output frequency, called idler (I), corresponds exactly to the frequency difference (νI = νP-νS) between the incoming pump (P) and signal (S) beam frequencies. Employing difference frequency generation in a periodically poled Lithiumniobate (PPLN) crystal between two distant subsets of teeth at 1.16 µm (νP) and 1.55 µm (νS), a third optical comb in the mid-infrared wavelength range at 4.6 µm (νI) will be produced. One tooth of this new optical comb will then be locked to an ultra-stable mid-infrared quantum cascade (QC) laser. This stabilization will again be achieved by locking the QC laser on a resonance of a high finesse Fabry-Perot cavity (short-term stability) and on a molecular absorption line (mid- and longer-term stability). The advantage of using a QC laser lies in its small physical dimensions and its excellent intrinsic linewidth properties. Due to its symmetric gain curve and a resulting nearly zero linewidth enhancement factor, its linewidth is expected to be a factor of 10-100 smaller than in a traditional diode laser. A further important advantage of the DFG process is that the offset frequency must no longer be known and stabilized: when the difference frequency is generated, the offset frequency f0 cancels in any case: ν I = ν P −ν S = ( N P ⋅ f rep + f 0 ) − ( N S ⋅ f rep + f 0 ) = ( N P − N S ) f rep = ν laser ⇒ f rep = ν laser /( N P − N S ) . This avoids the costly and sophisticated requirement of using an octave-spanning frequency comb. A spectrally narrower comb, which is much easier to handle and cheaper to fabricate, can be used. This comb is then free to shift in frequency as only the constant difference between two of its teeth is relevant for the locking to the QC laser and the stabilization.