* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Partition Functions in Classical and Quantum Mechanics
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Partition Functions in Classical and Quantum Mechanics The canonical partition function in classical mechanics was defined as, Z dE ZC,class = Ω(E) e−βE ∆ where Ω(E) is the volume of the phase space in the microcanonical ensemble. Z 1 Ω(E) = N.d dN.d p dN.d q h N ! Γ(E) (1) (2) where Γ(E) is a thin shell of thickness ∆ around a surface of constant energy E and d is the dimension of space and N is the total number of particles. We wish to generalize the above correspondence to quantum systems. To do this we have to realize that in quantum systems, the energy level are discrete (there are some exceptions but typically if one imposes periodic boundary conditions on the wavefunctions, they will always be discrete). Thus we have to make the correspondence, Z X dE E → En ; Ω(E) → gn = degeneracy of the energy level n ; = ∆ n and the integration is replaced by a summation. Thus in quantum mechanics we must have, X ZC,quant = gn e−βEn (3) n Now we wish to take some specific examples and evaluate the partition function for the classical and quantum harmonic oscillator in one dimension. Classical Harmonic Oscillator: Let us assume that the harmonic oscillator is described by the hamiltonian, H= p2 1 + k q2 2m 2 We wish to calculate the canonical partition function of this system. First we calculate the microcanonical function Ω(E). Z 1 Ω(E) = d.N dN.d q dN.d p h N ! Γ(E) Here the number of particles N = 1 and we are working in one dimension d = 1. hence, Z Z 1 Ω(E) = dq dp p2 h E−∆/2≤ 2m + 12 kq 2 ≤E+∆/2 2 To evaluate this it is better to transform to polar coordinates. r √ 2 p = 2m r cosθ ; q = r sinθ k ¯ ¯ dq dp ≡ ¯¯ r ¯ √ ¯ ¯ dr dθ = 2m 2 rdrdθ ¯ k ∂q ∂r ∂q ∂θ ∂p ∂r ∂p ∂θ and, H(q, p) = p2 1 + kq 2 = r2 2m 2 Therefore, 1 Ω(E) = h Z √ r 2m E−∆/2≤r 2 ≤E+∆/2 2 r dr k Z r 2π dθ = 0 4m π∆ k h Therefore, Z ∞ ZC,class = 0 dE −βE e Ω(E) = ∆ Z ∞ 0 dE −βE e ∆ r 4m π∆ = k h r 4m π 1 = k βh β~ω (4) q k where ω = m . Now that we have evaluated the partition function of the classical harmonic oscillator we now wish to evaluate the same quantity for the quantum harmonic oscillator. In other words, we wish to answer the question : ‘What is the canonical partition function if the mass attached to the spring obeys Schrodinger’s equation instead of Newton’s laws ?’. Quantum Harmonic Oscillator: We know that the energy levels of the quantum harmonic oscillator are given by, En = ~ω (n + 1/2) q where ω = k m. ZC,quant = The degeneracy of each level gn = 1. Hence the canonical partition function in the quantum case is, X n gn e−βEn = ∞ X e−β ~ω (n+1/2) n=0 = ∞ X e−β ~ω (n+1/2) = e−β ~ω 2 ∞ X n=0 n=0 ~ω e−β ~ω n = e−β 2 1 − e−β ~ω (5) Now we wish to see if the classical partition function in Eq.(4) may be obtained as a limiting case of the quantum partition function in Eq.(5). We know that quantum mechanics tends to classical mechanics as Planck’s constant tends to zero. To see this explicitly we examine, ~ω lim~→0 ZC,quant = lim~→0 e−β 2 1 ≈ = ZC,class 1 − e−β ~ω β ~ω (6) Alternatively and more importantly, the classical result is obtained at temperatures large ( kB T ) compared to the typical energy scale in the system namely ~ω, or kB T = β1 À ~ω. System of Harmonic oscillators Consider a system of N distinguishable harmonic oscillators but with the same k and m (they may be distinguished by some other non-mechanical attribute such as color). In this case the hamiltonian would be, H= ¶ N µ 2 X pi 1 + kqi2 2m 2 i=1 3 Instead of evaluating the canonical partition function in the manner of the previous section, we now wish to evaluate it differently. We substitute Eq.(2) into Eq.(1) to arrive at, Z Z dE 1 ZC,class,indisting. = dN.d p dN.d q e−βE (7) ∆ hN.d N ! Γ(E) Since we have assumed that the oscillators are distinguishable we should not have the N ! in the denominator. Hence for this specific example, ZC,class,distng. = N ! ZC,class,indisting. (8) Here, 1 ∆ Z dN.d p dN.d q = Γ(E) V olume of shell of thickness ∆ = Surf ace area of radius E ∆ Therefore, à Z dE 1 ∆ ! Z d N.d pd N.d q Z = Z dE (Surf ace area of radius E) = (Entire volume of phase space) Γ(E) Or, ZC,class,indisting. = Z 1 dN.d p dN.d q e−βH(q,p) hN.d N ! ZC,class,disting. = N ! ZC,class,indisting. (9) (10) This formula is much simpler for evaluation of the partition function. Thus for the system of harmonic oscillators PN p2i + 12 kqi2 . above we may write H(q, p) = i=1 h(qi , pi ) and h(qi , pi ) = 2m QN ≡ ZC,class,disting. 1 = N h µ Z ¶N 1 −βh(q1 ,p1 ) = dp1 dq1 e = (β~ω)−N h Z N N d pd qe −βH(q,p) (11) The Helmholtz free energy of the system is given by, µ A(V, N, T ) = −kB T lnQN = N kB T ln ~ω kB T ¶ (12) whence, µ P ≡− ∂A ∂V ¶ =0 (13) N,T since the above A does not depend on V . µ S=− ∂A ∂T ¶ ³ But, A = U − T S, or U = A + T S = N kB T ln · kB T ~ω ¶ ¸ ln + T N kB £ ¡ kB T ¢ ¤ ln ~ω + 1 = N kB T and CV = CP = N kB . N,V ~ω kB T µ = N kB ´ +1 (14) Homework : Calculate U and CV for the quantum case with distinguishable subsystems assuming that QN = QN N =1 .