Download Putative Etiologic Factors for Severe ECC

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Tooth whitening wikipedia , lookup

Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Crown (dentistry) wikipedia , lookup

Dentistry throughout the world wikipedia , lookup

Dental hygienist wikipedia , lookup

Focal infection theory wikipedia , lookup

Mouthwash wikipedia , lookup

Periodontal disease wikipedia , lookup

Scaling and root planing wikipedia , lookup

Special needs dentistry wikipedia , lookup

Dental degree wikipedia , lookup

Dental emergency wikipedia , lookup

Tooth decay wikipedia , lookup

Remineralisation of teeth wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Putative Etiologic Factors for
Severe ECC
Professor and Chair, Oral Biology, UCLA School of Dentistry
Professor, Microbiology and Immunology, UCLA School of Medicine
Executive Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer, C3 Jian Inc
It all starts with “Miller Time”
W.D. Miller and his "chemico-parasitic" theory
SUSCEPTIBLE
SUSCEPTIBLE
HOST
HOST
PLAQUE
PLAQUE
Oral
Oralbacteria
bacteria
TOOTH
TOOTH DECAY
DECAY
FERMENTABLE
FERMENTABLE
CARBOHYDRATE
CARBOHYDRATE
ACID
ACID
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
What is clear!
What is clear!
Cariogenic bacteria
Carbohydrates (sucrose)
Glucans/Levans
Plaque formation
Acids
Demineralization
What is clear!
100,000,000,000,000 bacteria/per mouth
Over 700 species have been identified
What are not clear
• About caries
– Are all factors equally important?
– Is there a dominant cariogenic bacterium?
– How to treat caries as an ecology based disease?
• About severe ECC
– The same etiologic factors at higher degree?
– New etiologic factors?
Struggle in the dark w/o knowing the answers
Xylitol etc
Cariogenic
Bacteria
Antimicrobials
Sugars
Tooth
Decay
Fluoride
What is getting clear
Host &
Teeth
Diet &
Time
Cariogenic
bacteria
Caries
What is getting clear
• Simple mechanical removal can not
control oral microbial infections
• Board spectrum antimicrobials can not
effectively control oral microbial infections
• Dental plaques are very resistant to
antimicrobial treatments
Reforming dental plaque after
extensive treatments
What is getting clear
S. mutans is the major cariogenic bacterium!
• Well-established data by other groups
– The presence of S. mutans is correlated with disease
– The absence of S. mutans is correlated with health
• New findings by us
– In collaboration with JCVI and PNNL, we developed a
novel confocal-NMR microscope, which led to the
discovery that S. mutans contributes 60-80% acids within
dental plaques
– In collaboration with Colgate, we discovered that the
targeted elimination of S. mutans will greatly reduce other
cariogenic bacteria within dental plaque
S. mutans-specific monoclonal antibodies
Species
Streptococcus mutans
Strain name
ATCC25175
LM7
OMZ175
Streptococcus rattus
ATCC19645
Streptococcus gordonii ATCC10558
Streptococcus mitis
ATCC49456
Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC33478
Streptococcus sanguis
ATCC10556
Streptococcus anginosus ATCC33397
Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC4356
Lactobacillus casei
ATCC4646
A. actinomycetemcomitans ATCC33384
Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC33277
Prevotella intermedia
ATCC49046
Bacteroides forsythus
ATCC43037
Eikenella corrodens
ATCC23834
Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC25586
SWLA1
+
+
+
-
Cross-reactivity
SWLA2
SWLA3
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Detecting S. mutans in dental plaque
MAb-based chairside test for S. mutans
MAb-based chairside test for S. mutans
Saliva diagnosis
Saliva with high S.
mutans content
Saliva with low S.
mutans content
Summary of salivary counts of S. mutans
among children under dental insurance
Fraction
0.27
0
1 10 20
50
Number of S. mutans in Saliva(104)
Summary of percentage of S. mutans of total
flora among children under dental insurance
Fraction
.286506
0
.01
19
10%
Percentage of S. mutans of total flora
DISTRIBUTION OF
RESTORATIVE SERVICES
80
60
10% OF THE POPULATION
RECEIVE 65% OF
RESTORATIONS
0
10
20
30
40
PERCENT POPULATION
40
20
0
50
PERCENT SERVICES
100
See Dee’s report on the
application of the technology