Download Productivity in the US Continues to Decline

Geopolitical Futures
Keeping the future in focus
https://geopoliticalfutures.com
Productivity in the US Continues to Decline
May 5, 2016 Communication may be supplanting actual work.
By George Friedman
The Bureau of Labor Statistics issued a report yesterday saying that labor productivity showed
the worst quarter-to-quarter decline since 1993. Productivity as a whole had been in a
downtrend every year since it peaked in 2003, after an extended period of growth. Productivity
per worker is one of the most important measures of economic health and a significant longterm forecaster. Its rise signals aggregate growth, and its decline signals trouble.
Productivity has been indicating problems since 2003, and the latest numbers reveal that the
problem is accelerating. It is a geopolitical problem because economic well-being is a dimension
of national power. A long-term decline in productivity is a problem. A short-term decline is less
of a problem. In an expanding economy with declining unemployment, productivity tends to fall.
Increased hiring out of a smaller pool means fewer skilled and motivated employees are being
hired. They tend to be less productive and productivity falls, triggering a recessionary cycle.
This may be happening now, but that doesn’t explain the long-term decline, beginning well
before 2008 and indeed going back into the late 1990s. The long-term decline may be
compounded by the cyclical decline, but the real concern is the long-term decline. It seems
counterintuitive given what most people regard as the growth of technology, but intuition is a
poor guide. It is important to at least posit some tentative explanations for this, joining others
who are trying to figure it out.
I would speculate on three causes.
First, the period that began in the 1980s of “re-engineering” companies is coming to an end. In
the 1970s, the post-war model of the corporation hit its limits. They were inefficient and
uncompetitive. During the 1980s, a massive restructuring of existing corporations took place,
rendering them more efficient. That increased productivity dramatically and, when added to the
emergence of a new generation of smaller and more efficient companies, led to a long-term
1/4
Geopolitical Futures
Keeping the future in focus
https://geopoliticalfutures.com
increase in productivity. In the 2000s, we entered a period in which further restructuring was
reaching the point of diminishing returns.
Second, there has been a dramatic increase in job mobility. The Bureau of Labor Statistics
reports that the average person has now had 10 jobs before the age of 40. Even jobs with the
same name take time to master at different companies. Assuming three of those jobs were afterschool jobs and the real entry into the workforce was on average at age 20, that would mean
seven jobs in 20 years, or about three years per job. An employee might have a net negative
value in their first year at a company, and then slowly produce value after training and
acclimation. The high frequency of job change means that an employee never reaches
maximum productivity, and is moving back to negative productivity with each new job. The
increased frequency of job change has to be affecting productivity. By the time you’ve learned
your job, you’re looking for your next one.
Third, there is the aging of the microchip culture. The first computers appeared about 40 years
ago. The dramatic increases in productivity were achieved in the first 20 to 30 years and have
declined since then. High tech is quite old tech, and today’s innovations are trivial
improvements on what was achieved at the high point, when the computer shifted from a data
manager to a communication tool. The smartphone fused the two sides of microchip culture into
one, and since then there have only been incremental improvements.
There is great excitement whenever Apple introduces a new product, but that reminds me of the
great excitement in the 1950s and 1960s when new cars were introduced each September.
There was little difference between the new and old versions, but Detroit marketing whipped the
country into a frenzy. The auto interest reached its high point about 50 years after the early
adopters bought the Model-A. We are now seeing the maturing of the microchip culture, with
declining gains in productivity.
In this case, it is not only flattening productivity growth but dealing a massive blow to
productivity in general. The microchip has yielded massive communication channels, but it has
not increased the amount of information that can be transmitted and absorbed. The worker is
human and the massive flow of information and the imperative to communicate in return has
significantly diverted hours from work.
Many jobs involve work that is solitary, and the culture of collaboration bred and imposed by
new systems of communication has systematically been eating into work time. Collaboration in
all its forms has supplanted focused labor and caused a decline in productivity. The multitasking
computer confronted humans. Many people think they are good at multitasking, but in fact the
quality of their performance is declining. In a culture where everyone is multitasking, the
deterioration of the work product is frequently ignored.
By turning the computer into a mobile communication device, two other effects were created.
2/4
Geopolitical Futures
Keeping the future in focus
https://geopoliticalfutures.com
First, and obviously, employees are in constant communication with others during work hours,
and some are looking at the web, while others play games. Supervision has weakened as the
supervisor has little access to what his staff is doing.
The second and most important effect is the deterioration of private life. This doesn’t appear to
be part of productivity but it is. Leisure is an indispensable part of labor. This is partly because
the smartphone is always present, and work never ends. But the smartphone is profoundly
damaging to human relations essential for a productive life. Communication began with two
people talking, with all of the essential non-verbal signals present. It was replaced by the
telephone, where physical communication collapsed but tonality in the voice was present. That
was replaced by the rebirth of written communication in email. Now email is passé and we text
and tweet.
What has happened in both work and leisure is a massive increase in the ways we communicate,
but where the thinnest form of communication wins. Conversation, even on the telephone, has
declined; email has withered into an unfashionable mode of communication. The increase of
communication channels has led to a contraction of information – and emotion – communicated.
This undermines productivity in two ways. First, it distracts dramatically from work, substituting
communication for production. Second, it has undermined the richness of private life from which
the inspiration and motivation for productivity is drawn. Time for real productivity declines, with
communication taking its place. As the number of Facebook friends soars, time to be human
contracts and the quality of relationships declines.
It is easy to dismiss this. But we are in a long-term decline in productivity, and it has to have a
cause. It is a fact that can’t be dismissed. I am not sure these are the causes, but I strongly
suspect they are part of the problem, at the very least.
Get insights like this directly in your inbox!
3/4
Geopolitical Futures
Keeping the future in focus
https://geopoliticalfutures.com
Sign up today for our popular, free email newsletter.
Each week, you will receive a free article on the underlying significance
of major events around us. Plus, you’ll get a free 30-day trial of some of
our exclusive paid content just for signing up!
hbspt.cta.load(2632125, '047f722a-c97b-4b88-94be-892cd60af724', {});
4/4
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)