Download Variation Tolerant Differential 8T SRAM Cell for Ultralow Power

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup

Cytosol wikipedia , lookup

Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup

Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup

Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup

JADE1 wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup

Cell wall wikipedia , lookup

Cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Cell culture wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup

Cell growth wikipedia , lookup

Mitosis wikipedia , lookup

Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Variation Tolerant Differential 8T SRAM Cell for Ultralow Power Applications
Abstract:
Low power and noise tolerant static random access memory (SRAM) cells are in
high demand today. This paper presents a stable differential SRAM cell that
consumes low power. The proposed cell has similar structure to conventional 6T
SRAM cell with the addition of two buffer transistors, one tail transistor and one
complementary word line. Due to stacking effect, the proposed cell achieves
lower power dissipation. In this paper, impact of process parameters variations on
various design metrics of the proposed cell are presented and compared with
conventional differential 6T (D6T), transmission gate-based 8T (TG8T), and single
ended 8T (SE8T) SRAM cells. Impact of process variation, like threshold voltage
and length, on different design metrics of an SRAM cell like, read static noise
margin (RSNM), read access time (TRA), and write access time (TWA) are also
presented. The proposed cell achieves 1.12×/1.43×/5.62× improvement in
TRA compared to TG8T/D6T/SE8T at a penalty of 1.1×/4.88× in TWA compared to
D6T/TG8T and 1.19×/1.18× in read/write power consumption compared to D6T.
An improvement of 1.12×/2.15× in RSNM is observed compared to D6T/TG8T. The
proposed cell consumes 5.38× less power during hold mode and also shows 2.33x
narrower spread in hold power @ VDD = 0.4 V compared to D6T SRAM cell.