Download chromosome aberrations induced by the Auger Emitter I

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup

Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup

Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup

Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup

Cell growth wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Cell culture wikipedia , lookup

Cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Mitosis wikipedia , lookup

JADE1 wikipedia , lookup

Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS INDUCED BY THE AUGER EMITTER I-125
Schmitz Sabine, Oskamp Dominik, Pomplun Ekkehard, Kriehuber Ralf
Department of Safety and Radiation Protection, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425
Jülich, Germany
[email protected]
Introduction: DNA-associated Auger-electron emitters (AEE) induce cellular damage leading
to high-LET type cell survival curves and possess enhanced relative biological effectiveness.
DNA dsb induced by Iodine-125-deoxyuridine (I-125-UdR) decays are claimed to be very
complex, thus efficiently leading to cell transformation, gene mutation and induction of
chromatid aberrations. To elucidate the assumed genotoxic potential of DNA-associated AEE,
chromosomal/chromatid aberrations were analyzed in I-125-UdR-exposed human peripheral
blood lymphocytes (PBL).
Methods: PBL were isolated from whole blood and stimulated with chromosome medium
containing phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). After 24 h cultures were labeled with I-125-UdR for
18 h (0.25-4.5 kBq/ml) during the S-phase of the cell cycle. After removal of radioactive
medium and washing steps, cells were re-cultured in stimulation medium for further 24 h.
Colcemid was added 5.5 h before harvest of cells followed by fixation for aberrations at 71.5
h post-stimulation. All slides were stained with 10 % Giemsa, and 100 metaphases were
analyzed microscopically for each dose point.
Results: After 18 h labeling with I-125-UdR the cell cycle distribution is severely disturbed.
Furthermore, 40% of PBL are fully labelled and 20% show a moderate uptake of I-125-UdR.
I-125-UdR primarily induces chromatid-type aberrations. PBL reveal a very broad dosedependent response spectrum: equal numbers of cells have either no aberration, or display a
moderate aberration level (1-9 aberrations). Few cells exhibit a high aberration score (> 10
aberrations). A dose-dependent increase of aberrations is measured in the range of 0.2 to 2
Gy, followed by a plateau between 2 and 4.5 Gy. The data indicate that even the lowest dose
of 0.2 Gy leads to significant damage in PBL and to a 4.5-fold increase of aberrations
compared to the controls. Furthermore, a dose-dependent increase of cell death is observed.
Conclusions: I-125-UdR has a very strong genotoxic capacity in human PBL even at very low
doses of about 0.2 Gy. Efficiently labeled cells displaying a prolonged cell cycle compared to
moderate labeled cells, and cell death contribute substantially to the desynchronisation of the
cell cycle. In summary, it can be concluded that every fourth intracellular I-125 decay give
rise to a single chromosome aberration.