Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Slide 1 SOCIOLOGY Richard T. Schaefer 9 McGraw-Hill Stratification and Social Mobility in the United States © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 2 9. Stratification and Social Mobility in the United States • • • • Understanding Stratification Stratification by Social Class Social Mobility Social Policy and Stratification McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 3 Understanding Stratification • Systems of Stratification – Ascribed Status: social position assigned to person without regard for that person’s unique characteristics or talents – Achieved Status: social position attained by person largely through his or her own effort McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 4 Understanding Stratification • Systems of Stratification – Slavery: most extreme form of legalized social inequality – Castes: hereditary systems of rank, usually religiously dictated, that tend to be fixed and immobile – Estate System: associated with feudal societies in the Middle Ages McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 5 Understanding Stratification • Systems of Stratification – Social Classes • Class System: social ranking based primarily on economic position in which achieved characteristics can influence social mobility • Rossides (1997) uses five-class model to describe U.S. class system: • Upper class • Upper-middle class • Lower-middle class McGraw-Hill • Working class • Lower class © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 6 Understanding Stratification Figure 9-1. Household Income in the United States, 2001 Source: DeNavas-Walt and Cleveland 2002:15 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 7 Understanding Stratification • Perspectives on Stratification – Karl Marx’s View of Class Differentiation • Social relations depend on who controls the primary mode of production Proletariat: working Bourgeoisie: capitalistclass class; owns the means of Capitalism: economic system in which the means production of production are held largely in private hands and the main incentive for economic activity is the accumulation of profits McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 8 Understanding Stratification • Perspectives on Stratification – Karl Marx’s View of Class Differentiation • Class Consciousness: subjective awareness of common vested interests and the need for collective political action to bring about change • False Consciousness: attitude held by members of class that does not accurately reflect their objective position McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 9 Understanding Stratification • Perspectives on Stratification – Max Weber’s View of Stratification • No single characteristic totally defines a person’s position with the stratification system Status Group: people who have the same prestige or lifestyle McGraw-Hill Class: group of people who have similar level of wealth and income Power: ability to exercise one’s will over others © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 10 Understanding Stratification • Perspectives on Stratification – Interactionist View • Interested in the importance of social class in shaping a person’s lifestyle McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 11 Understanding Stratification • Is Stratification Universal? – Inequality exists in all societies—even the simplest • Functionalist View Social inequity necessary so people will be motivated to fill functionally important positions. McGraw-Hill Does not explain the wide disparity between the rich and the poor © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 12 Understanding Stratification • Is Stratification Universal? – Conflict View • Human beings prone to conflict over scarce resources such as wealth, status, and power • Stratification major source of societal tension and conflict that will inevitably lead to instability and social change McGraw-Hill Dominant Ideology: set of cultural beliefs and practices that helps to maintain powerful social, economic, and political interests © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 13 Understanding Stratification • Is Stratification Universal? – Lenski’s Viewpoint • As a society advances technologically, it becomes capable of producing a considerable surplus of goods • Emergence of surplus resources greatly expands possibilities for inequality in status, influence, and power • Allocation of surplus goods and services reinforces social inequality McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 14 Understanding Stratification Figure 9-2. Around the World: What’s a CEO Worth? Source: Towers Perin Bryant 1999:Section 4, p. 1 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 15 Understanding Stratification Table 9-1. Major Perspectives on Social Stratification McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 16 Stratification by Social Class • Measuring Social Class – Objective Method • Class largely viewed as a statistical category based on – – – – McGraw-Hill Occupation Education Income Place of residence Prestige: respect and admiration an occupation holds in society Esteem: reputation specific person has earned within an occupation © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 17 Stratification by Social Class • Measuring Social Class – Gender and Occupational Prestige – Multiple Measures • Wealth and Income – Income in U.S. distributed unevenly • In 2001, richest fifth of the population held 84.5% of nation’s wealth McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. . Slide 18 Stratification by Social Class Table 9-2. Prestige Rankings of Occupations Source: J. Davis et al. 2003 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 19 Stratification by Social Class Figure 9-3. U.S. Income Pyramid, 2003 Source: Developed by author based on data from DeNavas-Walt et al. 2004; HINC-01 and the Internal Revenue Service (2004) McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 20 Stratification by Social Class Figure 9-4. Distribution of Wealth in the United States, 2001 Source: Wolff:2002 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 21 Stratification by Social Class Figure 9-5. U.S. Minimum Wage Adjusted for Inflation, 1950—2005 Source: Author’s estimate and Bureau of the Census 2003a:425 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 22 Stratification by Social Class • Poverty – Absolute poverty: minimum level of subsistence that no family should live below – Relative poverty: floating standard by which people at the bottom of a society are judged as being disadvantaged in comparison to the nation as a whole McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 23 Stratification by Social Class • Poverty – Who Are the Poor? • Not a static social class – Explaining Poverty • In Gans’s view, poverty and poor satisfy positive functions for many non poor groups Life Chances: opportunities to provide material goods, positive living conditions, and favorable life experience McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 24 Stratification by Social Class Figure 9-6. Absolute Poverty in Selected Industrial Countries Source: Smeeding et al. 2001:51 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 25 Stratification by Social Class Table 9-3. Who Are the Poor in the United Sates? Source: DeNavas-Walt et al. 2004:10 McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 26 Social Mobility • Open versus Closed Stratification Systems – Indicate social mobility in a society • Open System: position of each individual influenced by the person’s achieved position • Closed System: allows little or no possibility of moving up Social Mobility: Movement of individuals or groups from one position in a society’s stratification system to another McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 27 Social Mobility • Types of Social Mobility – Horizontal Mobility: movement within same range of prestige – Vertical Mobility: movement from one position to another of a different rank – Intragenerational Mobility: social position changes within person’s adult life McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 28 Social Mobility • Social Mobility in the United States – Occupational Mobility – The Impact of Education – The Impact of Race and Ethnicity – The Impact of Gender McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 29 Social Policy and Stratification • Government and Poverty – The Issue • Governments searching for right solution to welfare – How much subsidy? – How much responsibility should poor assume? McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 30 Social Policy and Stratification • Government and Poverty – The Setting • Shifts in U.S. welfare program in 1996 • Most countries devote higher proportions of expenditures to – – – – – McGraw-Hill Housing Social security Welfare Health care Unemployment compensation © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 31 Social Policy and Stratification • Government and Poverty – Sociological Insights • Many sociologists view debate over welfare reform from conflict perspective • Corporate Welfare: tax breaks, direct payments, and grants the government makes to corporations McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 32 Social Policy and Stratification • Government and Poverty – Policy Initiatives • Prospect for hard-core jobless faded • In North America and Europe, people beginning to turn to private means to support themselves • People seeing gap between themselves and the affluent grow with fewer government programs to assist them McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.