Download acute rhinosinusitis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Gastroenteritis wikipedia , lookup

Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup

Myasthenia gravis wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Urinary tract infection wikipedia , lookup

Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Allergy wikipedia , lookup

Traveler's diarrhea wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis signs and symptoms wikipedia , lookup

Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup

Common cold wikipedia , lookup

Sinusitis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS
HUNTER A. HOOVER, M.D.
CHARLOTTE EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Viral Rhinosinusitis  the common cold
1. History
(a) Duration of symptoms
 improving (but not necessarily resolved) after 7-10 days
(b) Pattern of symptoms
 initially, sore throat (with fever and myalgia)
 then, nasal symptoms (may have purulence for a few days)
 finally, cough (which usually lasts weeks)
2. Treatment
(a) Antihistamines

 first generation antihistamines help


 because of their anticholinergic activity

 alkylamines produce the least sedation and most anticholinergic activity

 ex: chlorpheniramine and brompheniramine


 majority of OTC meds contain chlorpheniramine


   ex: Chlor-Trimeton, Comtrex, Contac, Pediacare
 antihistamines in tannate form are dosed BID, even in suspension form
 ex. chlorpheniramine tannate (with phenylephrine tannate) in Rynatan susp.
(b) Methscopolamine nitrate

 antisecretory agent, so causes drying of secretions


 including saliva

 does not significantly cross blood brain barrier


 so sedation is unlikely

 may be combined with:


 decongestant (ex. AlleRx-D)
 decongestant in morning and antihistamine/decongestant in evening
(AlleRx Dose Pack & AlleRx-PE Dose Pack…available in 10 & 30 day packs)


 antihistamine (ex. AlleRx DF Dose Pack)


 antihistamine/decongestant (ex. Dallergy)
(c) Anticholinergic spray

 Atrovent 0.06% indicated for rhinorrhea of colds


 in adults and children 6 years and up
(d) Oral decongestants

 pseudoephedrine is probably superior to phenylephrine
 pseudoephedrine tannate and phenylephrine tannate are dosed BID, even in suspension

 does not seem to worsen controlled hypertension
(e) Topical decongestants

 in adults, oxymetazoline (Afrin) BID or phenylephrine (Neo-Synephrine) QID

 in children 2-6 years old, consider prescription for tetrahydrozoline (Tyzine) QID


or, in select cases, diluted Afrin
more effective with less side effects than oral decongestants 

must emphasize need to limit duration of use to 5 days or less 
(f) Expectorants
-1-


















 unlikely benefit, since secretions typically not thick
(g) Antitussives
 limited benefit
(h) Combination products
 antihistamine/decongestant combinations seem to have the most benefit

 Ryna-12 is a liquid combination dosed b.i.d.
 must weigh benefit against side effects (sedation, insomnia, urinary retention, etc.)
(i) Zinc gluconate lozenges
 theoretic mechanism of action is local, not systemic
 dissolve one lozenge in mouth every 2 hours while awake beginning within 24
hours of onset of cold
 high incidence of nausea and bad taste
 conflicting studies as to effectiveness
(j) Zinc nasal swabs and spray
 marketed as Zicam cold remedy swabs and spray
 removed from market due to FDA concerns
regarding possible loss of sense of smell
(k) No antibiotics
 antibiotics have only a small chance of be beneficial
 in adults, only 1% of colds become bacterial sinusitis
 in children, only 0.5-5% of colds become bacterial sinusitis
 the small chance of preventing a bacterial infection must be weighed against
 increased incidence of developing resistant bacteria
 potential side effects of the antibiotic
 studies substantiate that patient satisfaction can be achieved without prescribing antibiotics
Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
1. History
 Factors to consider:
(a) duration of symptoms

  lasting at least 7-10 days
(b) persistency of symptoms

  not improving after 7-10 days
(c) pattern of symptoms

  worsening of symptoms after initial improvement (i.e “double sickening”)
(d) type of symptoms

  persistent purulent nasal discharge 

  facial pain/pressure

  especially localized facial pain and/or maxillary teeth pain
 nasal obstruction 

  fever beyond the first few days 
 Diagnostic guidelines (Otol-HNS 2007;137:S1-S31)
(a) symptoms persisting more than 10 days and including:
- purulent nasal discharge, and
- nasal obstruction, or facial pain

(b) symptoms worsening after initial improvement (i.e “double sickening”)
  even if less than 10 days
-2-
2. Physical Exam
(a) Anterior rhinoscopy

 pus in the nasal cavity is supportive, but not conclusive, for bacterial infection

 purulent drainage may also be seen in oropharynx
(b) Percussion (i.e. tap tenderness)

 not helpful, unless definitely abnormal
(c) Transillumination

 in adults, helpful if done with proper technique and if definitely normal or abnormal

 in children, no proven benefit
(d) Nasal endoscopy

 helpful but requires expertise, special equipment, and patient cooperation
-3-
3. X-Ray
(a) Plain films

 correspond to maxillary sinus aspirate in only 70% of cases

  findings of “air-fluid level” and “maxillary opacification” are relatively specific
for bacterial maxillary sinusitis

 including the finding of “mucosal thickening” increases the sensitivity, but
decreases the specificity of plain films

 the absence of all three of these x-ray findings strongly suggests against
bacterial maxillary sinusitis

extremely poor in evaluating the ethmoid sinuses

  a normal plain film may rule out maxillary sinusitis, but not ethmoid sinusitis
(b) CT

“gold standard” for detecting inflammation, but not necessarily a bacterial infection

  90% of viral infections have abnormal mucosal thickening on a sinus CT

  30% of reportedly asymptomatic patients have abnormal findings on a sinus CT
4. Antibiotic Treatment
(a) Need for antibiotics

 spontaneous resolution rate of clinically determined sinusitis is around 66%

 benefits of antibiotic:
 more rapid resolution of symptoms
 50% reduction in clinical failures

 recent position paper (Otol-HNS 2007; 137:S1-S31) endorsed watchful waiting as an
option (not recommendation) if:


 mild illness


 assurance of follow-up
(b) Choice of antibiotics
 first line:
 pediatric…amoxicillin 80 mg/kg/day divided BID
 take child’s weight in pounds
 double it
 add a zero
 give that dose BID
 adult…amoxicillin 500 mg three tablets BID
 second line (in order of efficacy):
 Avelox / Levaquin
 Augmentin XR and ES
 Augmentin 875
 Vantin / Omnicef / Ceftin
(c) Duration of antibiotics
 short course therapy of 5 days may be adequate for most routine cases
 as supported by “double tap studies”
 more prolonged courses may be warranted for chronic and/or recurrent cases
5. Adjunctive Treatment
(a) Topical decongestant

(b) Oral decongestant
 refer to “Viral Rhinosinusitis” section
(c) Antihistamine
-4-



 usually not necessary because most cases of sinusitis follow a “cold”, not allergies
 if used, select a second generation one to avoid anti-cholinergic drying effects
 unlike colds where first generation antihistamines should be used
(d) Expectorant

 for guaifenesin to be effective, need maximum dosing


 2-6 years old……total daily dose of 600 mg


 6-12 years old..…total daily dose of 1200 mg


 12 years and up…total daily dose of 2400 mg

 products that provide 2400 mg for a day


 Robitussin (guaifenesin 100 mg/5 cc) 30 cc QID


 Mucinex (guaifenesin 600 mg) 2 tabs BID
 generic guaifenesin tabs (400 mg) 2 tabs TID
 immediate release and least expensive
(e) Saline wash 

 instead of 1-2 sprays, “wash” with


 multiple squirts from OTC nasal spray container


 lavage bottle (ex. www.neilmed.com)


 neti pot

 commercial canisters which “wash”
 Simply Saline (available at most drugstores)…either normal or hypertonic saline


 ENTsol spray (available at www.entsolwash.com)...hypertonic saline
 can make hypertonic saline, by adding
 1 heaping teaspoon of Kosher or canning/pickling salt
 plus a pinch of baking soda
 into 8 ounces of distilled water
(f) Topical nasal steroid sprays

 appear safe to use even in the presence of a bacterial infection

 Cochrane review in 2007 supports their use
(g) Oral steroids

 a consideration for:
 severe sinusitis with impending complication
 persisting sinusitis despite appropriate antibiotic treatment
 most physiologic to use orally only once a day in the morning
 taper is probably not necessary if steroid course is 10 days or less
Allergic Rhinitis
1. History
-distinction from viral rhinitis:

-fever and other systemic symptoms suggest against allergy
-itching of nose and eyes are suggestive of allergy
-allergy symptoms are chronic
 often lasting longer than 7-10 days
-allergy symptoms are recurrent
 often in a predictable pattern based on change in environment
 “frequent colds” may be allergic rhinitis
-correlation with allergy testing
-results of allergy tests need to be consistent with timing of symptoms
2. Avoidance
-5-
-if symptoms worse during pollen seasons
-keep windows closed and allow AC to filter out the pollens
-if symptoms are perennial (i.e. possible dust mite allergy)
-use pillow and mattress mite-proof encasings
-use a vacuum with HEPA filtration or special allergy bags on a weekly basis
-keep humidity less than 50%
-exterminate any cockroaches
-if symptoms worse with animal exposure
-ideally, get rid of offending pet
-more realistically, keep pet out of patient’s bedroom, and
place free-standing HEPA air cleaner in patient’s bedroom
3. Nasal steroid sprays
-most effective allergy medicine available
-multiple trials show superior efficacy to oral antihistamines, Astelin, Singulair, etc.
-especially for the symptom of congestion
-most effective if used on a daily basis
-due to delayed onset of action
-but effective even with prn use
-current studies suggest excellent long-term safety profile
-clinical trials suggest equal efficacy between all nasal steroid sprays
-compliance is the key
-patients prefer unscented sprays
-Nasonex, Nasacort, Rhinocort, Omnaris and Veramyst (lowest volume of spray)
-patients prefer low co-pay
-Flonase is generic (but is scented)
-age indications
-Nasonex , Nasacort-AQ and Veramyst: 2 years and up
-Flonase: 4 years and up
-Rhinocort Aqua and Omnaris: 6 years and up
-technique of administering may decrease incidence of epistaxis
-avoid spraying towards the septum
4. First generation oral antihistamines
-studies show patients may have psychomotor impairment
-even without subjective sedation
-anticholinergic side effects are possible
-dry mouth, blurring of vision, urinary retention, etc.
5. Second generation oral antihistamines
-no anticholinergic side effects
-so no dry mouth nor urinary retention side effects
-so no benefit for rhinorrhea of colds or vasomotor rhinitis
-no significant decongestant properties
-so more beneficial for “runners” than “blockers”
-Cetirizine (Zyrtec)
-studies suggest superior efficacy
-low-sedating (not non-sedating)
-requires warning regarding driving and use with alcohol
-generic OTC is relatively inexpensive
-Levocetirizine (Xyzal)
-clinical trials showing superior efficacy to Zyrtec are lacking
-low-sedating (not non-sedating)
-6-
6.
7.
8.
9.
-requires warning regarding driving and use with alcohol
-Loratadine (Claritin)
-may not be as effective as other antihistamines
-generic OTC is relatively inexpensive
-Desloratadine (Clarinex)
-clinical trials showing superior efficacy to Claritin are lacking
-Fexofenadine (Allegra)
- combines effectiveness and safety
- The Medical Letter: April 30, 2001 and March 18, 2002
-available as a generic
Nasal antihistamine spray (Astelin and Astepro)
-indicated both for allergic and non-allergic rhinitis
-poor masking of the placebo may explain Astelin’s “efficacy” for non-allergic rhinitis
-bitter taste
-low sedating (not non-sedating)
-requires warning regarding driving and use with alcohol
Leukotriene receptor antagonist (Singulair)
-theoretically, should relieve congestion better than antihistamines
-however, not substantiated by clinical trials
-theoretically, combining antihistamine with leukotriene antagonist should be additive
-however, not substantiated by most clinical trials
-also indicated for asthma
-so may be a good option for patient with asthma and allergic rhinitis
Cromolyn sodium spray (Nasalcrom)
-OTC
-excellent safety profile, even in pregnancy
-frequent dosing required (t.i.d.-q.i.d.)
Immunotherapy
-subcutaneous injection of the antigens to which the patient is allergic
-begin at a low dose and gradually increase up to a long-term maintenance dose
-alters patient’s immune system
-so that their immune system no longer over-reacts to harmless environmental substances
-advantages
-addressing the underlying etiology (i.e. the immune system)
-outcome studies show better symptom control as compared to medications alone
-disadvantages
-potential for anaphylaxis
-20% of patients do not respond
-if respond, usually have to continue shots for 3 years or more
09/2010
-7-