* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Hybrid Go-Kart University of Connecticut Department of Electrical
Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup
Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup
Nominal impedance wikipedia , lookup
Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Transformer wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Utility frequency wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Skin effect wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Zobel network wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Earthing system wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic core wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid Go-Kart University of Connecticut Department of Electrical Engineering Team Members: Jonathan Blake (EE), Nathan Butterfield (EE), Joshua Calkins (EE), Anupam Ojha (EE) Advisor: Prof. Sung-Yeul Park 11/18/2013 1 Outline • • • • • • Introduction Power Sources Boost Converter Revisions Flyback Converter EIS Characteristics Timeline/Next Steps 2 What is Our Project? • Design a power electronics system to combine three separate power sources in order to drive an electric go-kart. 3 The Power Sources • We will use three power sources: oA 30V Lead Acid battery oFour ultra-capacitors, wired in series, at 14V across bank oPhotovoltaic Panel, 8->40V output, 200W 4 System Overview 5 Boost Converter Design • The design of our boost converter has changed drastically. • The driving factor of these changes has been the input current. • All of the following topologies were designed for 1.2kW. 6 Initial Design: 12V->36V • Two boost converters in parallel, one for the ultra-capacitors, one for the battery. • Input current of 100A. • Finding an inductor rated for this current within out budget proved impossible. 7 Parallel Current Paths • Placing multiple power stages in parallel is one way to handle the current. 8 Parallel Paths (cont.) • Again, the inductors caused problems. • 1 𝐿1 + 1 𝐿2 + ⋯+ 1 𝐿𝑖 = 1 𝐿𝑒𝑞 • 8 inductors were required • An integrated circuit controller solution was found. 9 Integrated Circuit Controller 10 PCB Implementation • Some of the paths shown in the previous diagram would have currents of 100 A. • The cost of a PCB capable of handling these currents may be cost prohibitive. 11 Boost Power-Stage Platform • High-current sections of a boost converter placed on separate platform, connected by cables. • Current and voltage sensor output to microcontroller. • Gate switching would determined by microcontroller, sent through gate drive circuit. 12 Boost Power-Stage Platform (cont.) 13 Flyback Specifications • • • • • • • High current caused for multiple design alterations. 4:7 turns ratio Voltage Primary 8V-40V. Secondary Voltage 14V. 16.7% to 50% Duty cycle Current max 5A in 14.3A Inductance on primary 20μH 𝐿 = 𝑁 2 𝐴𝐿 14 Flyback Schematic Flyback Transformer • • • • Selection of core geometry and material. Toroid, E I core with gap Kool mμ, ferromagnetic material, MPP Core loss due to eddy currents and hysteresis 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡 = 𝑘𝑓 𝑚 𝐵𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝑛 , where k,m and n are constants 𝑘𝑔 that pertain to specific core material, 𝑓 is frequency and 𝐵𝑀𝑎𝑥 is the maximum flux density. 16 𝐵𝑀𝑎𝑥 • Core saturation • Residual flux • 𝐵𝑀𝑎𝑥 = 𝑉𝑝𝑘 𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑥108 𝑁𝐴𝑒 Gauss • Units used for B and H are not consistant 17 Litz Wire • High frequency increases wire loss due to skin effect. • Multistrand Litz wire distributes current • Small wire gauge allows signal to penetrate into the wire. • Higher cost • Window fill 18 EIS Testing • • Measure impedance at different frequencies Different sources and loads have different electrochemical characteristics that can change overtime • Humidity, temperature, oxidation & electrode corrosion Diffusion creates impedance at low frequencies (Warburg) makes impedance difficult to determine • • Electron & ion transport, gas & solid phase reactant transport, heterogeneous reactions different characteristic time-constants exhibited at different AC frequencies. EIS Setup • The device under test (DUT) will be the battery, PV panel and ultra-capacitor. Block diagram required for FRA to preform tests and obtain data. FRA & eLoad Frequency Response Analyzer (FRA) Programmable eLoad • FRA injects a range of frequencies along with a perturbation into the test device & signals the programmable load • Measures voltage and current; creates Bode and Nyquist Plots • Programmable eLoad varies impedance throughout the test. EIS Setup Phases • FRA Computer interface o Manuals, Drivers, XP OS • FRA out signal o Frequency sweep test • Cooling T connector o Battery, ultra-capacitors, PV panel • C2E2 EIS testing setup o Battery & ultra-capacitors FRA Computer interface Timeline Updated •Blue = Original Plan •Yellow = Updated Plan Next Steps • PCB Design of Flyback and Gate Drivers • Physical Layout of Boost Power-Stage Platform • EIS of Battery and Ultra-Capacitors • Software algorithm and MPPT 24 Questions? 25