* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download TODAY. . . Selection Directional Stabilizing Disruptive More HW
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Viral phylodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Group selection wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
TODAY. . . Selection Directional Stabilizing Disruptive More HW Genetic Drift Allele fixation Selection • Natural: Increase in the frequency of alleles that increase reproductive success • Sexual: A specific type of natural selection; increase in the frequency of alleles that enhance one’s ability to obtain mates Something to keep in mind. . . We have simplified what is really going on with respect to genetic diversity! There may be many alleles for the same gene in any given population. Homework question 1. Construct a version of the Hardy-Weinberg equations that could be applied to a gene with three alleles. Genetic variation • The number and relative frequency of alleles that are present in a population • Some types of selection increase variation, other types reduce it. • To the extent that phenotype is determined by genotype, a reduction in phenotypic diversity will reduce genetic diversity 4. In a population of leatherback sea turtles, two alleles that are incompletely dominant exist for a gene that affects shell thickness and weight (S – thick, heavy shell; s – thin, light shell). You sample 100 individuals from the population: 37 are SS, 8 are ss, and 55 are Ss. A)Is this population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium? Why or why not? B) Create a hypothesis to explain why this population is, or is not, as the case may be, in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Which Hardy-Weinberg assumptions could be violated, if any? Heterozygote advantage When heterozygotes have a fitness advantage over homozygotes, keeping genetic variation in a population More on Selection. . . Directional Selection • Allele frequencies change in one direction • Variation is reduced • Mean value of trait increases or decreases Great Plains Cliff Swallows • Population endures extended cold weather • Food source dies • Swallows die • Who’s left? Why? • Body fat stores helped carry them through thin times Stabilizing Selection • Extreme phenotypes are lost (tails of distribution reduced) – Reduces variation • Mean value of trait remains unchanged Stabilizing Selection • Birth weight in humans • High mortality rates for very large and for very small* • Nutrition influenced? Disruptive Selection • Extreme phenotypes are favored; Phenotypes near mean value are eliminated • Mean does not change • Distributions becomes bimodal – Variation increased Disruptive Selection • Black-billed seedcrackers • Large-billed individuals specialize on large seeds, small-billed on small seeds • Intermediate sizes handle seeds inefficiently Genetic Drift • Undirected change in allele frequencies – due to sampling error (random mating) • In very large populations, sampling error plays a small role; in small populations, it matters a lot! Consequences of Drift • No allele is more fit than any other (no natural selection) – drift is random with respect to fitness • BUT, some alleles clearly “won” the reproduction lottery – They randomly increased their frequency in the population • In finite populations equally fit alleles are at risk of disappearing = loss (freq = 0) – Over time drift can produce random loss or fixation (freq = 1) of alleles Consequences of Drift Depends on. . . • Population size! – founder effect (colonization of new habitat by few individuals with a random and reduced sample of alleles from the source population) – bottlenecks (rapid, large reduction in population size) • Probability that an allele will become fixed in the population = frequency of that allele in the population – @ each generation, probability of fixation changes! Importance in natural populations? • Small: zoos, endangered species • Large: pseudogenes and silent mutations have no effect on fitness (invisible, for now, to selection), but are an important source of raw material for future selection events; Drift can eliminate these from populations. • Reduces genetic diversity After allele fixation, the only way to increase genetic diversity is to introduce new alleles! How? Gene Flow (immigration and emigration of new alleles) Effect on average fitness – Genetic drift reduces allelic diversity, so the arrival of new alleles might increase fitness – BUT, If populations are well adapted to their environment, then new (non-adaptive) alleles might reduce average fitness Mutation 1. The only creator of novelty (new alleles) 2. Restores genetic diversity 3. Fitness of mutations is random a. Most mutations are deleterious (negative effect on fitness) b. Sometimes they’re beneficial, and may spread through the population