Download Survey: Ethics and Genes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Twin study wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Human genome wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup

Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Genomic library wikipedia , lookup

Genome editing wikipedia , lookup

Human Genome Project wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Press Release: Ethics and Genes Survey
What are your views on what happens to your genomic information?
Survey aims to be the largest to capture public attitudes to sharing genomic
results
Would you want to know about your genetic risk for hundreds of conditions all
in one go, ranging from whether you have a higher than average risk from
Alzheimer’s disease or diabetes or whether you are sensitive to certain
antibiotics or statins? How do you feel about researchers generating this
information but not sharing it with you?
An ethics team from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute today launches an
online survey to capture the views of as many people as possible: they hope it
will be the largest collection of opinions gathered to date.
It has been standard practice for many years to conduct genetic research
anonymously and not share such findings with the research participants who
provided the samples. However, there is now increasing pressure to change this
approach.
“We need to understand what people want from whole genome testing,” says Dr
Anna Middleton, Ethics Researcher from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.
“Policy is being written world wide on what researchers should share from
genome studies and yet much of this is based on anecdote and intuition. We aim
to address this by conducting an international study that asks members of the
public, health professionals and researchers for their views.”
Genetic analysis of a saliva or blood sample can now reveal elements of a
person’s past, present and future medical health. In whole genome studies,
researchers can examine all 20,000 human genes in only a matter weeks to
understand the genetic basis of disease.
An ethics team from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge, UK use
film in an innovative online questionnaire to explore the ethical implications of
whole genome research. Participants in the survey need have no prior
knowledge about genetics and anyone can participate (see
www.genomethics.org). The study aims to be the largest of its kind in the world
and will be used to guide policy on how genome research studies should be
conducted. This survey is part of the proactive process of engaging with the
public, before whole genome studies become part of health service practice.
“It is soon going to be cheaper and easier to look at all of a person’s 20,000 genes
in one go rather than searching for an individual gene, as currently happens,”
says Professor Anneke Lucassen, Consultant in Clinical Genetics, University of
Southampton. “This raises all sorts of ethical issues about what genetic results
you share with people. Very soon this technology will be used in the NHS and we
urgently need research that tells us what people want to know.”
“This is a really exciting project using an innovative questionnaire and the
integrated films really bring it to life,” says Professor Mike Parker, Professor of
Bioethics and Director of the Ethox Centre at University of Oxford. “The
questionnaire asks for feedback on some difficult ethical issues and I will be
encouraging everyone I know to participate.”