Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Mammalian Genome 11, 671–674 (2000). DOI: 10.1007/s003350010122 Incorporating Mouse Genome © Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2000 Improvements in allelic discrimination of microsatellite markers using denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis R.C. Andrew Symons, Vikki M. Marshall, Simon J. Foote The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research, C/-Royal Melbourne Post Office, VIC 3050, Australia Received: 7 February 2000 / Accepted: 16 March 2000 Abstract. Poor resolution, retarded progress of DNA through gels, and variable sizing of DNA fragments between and within gels hinder accurate genotyping of some simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) markers with the Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems 377 Sequenator. These problems are similar to renaturation related problems observed in DNA sequencing gels. PCR products especially susceptible to these problems are shown to have higher melting temperatures (Tm) than others. Gels containing increased concentrations of denaturants allow greater accuracy in allelic discrimination. This is especially beneficial where quantification is necessary. Introduction Considerable experience with running genotyping gels on the ABI 377 sequenator has demonstrated frequent, often marker-specific problems in analysis. These are: (i) retarded passage of PCR product through the gel, leading to a smudging effect beyond the correct size position of the product; (ii) inconsistent mobility of the same alleles between lanes on a gel; (iii) poor resolution of the set of peaks associated with an allele. These effects resulted in difficulty in assigning alleles to intensity peaks on genotyping gels and severely impeded quantitation of allelic imbalance. Similar difficulties have been encountered with nonfluorescent genotyping (Litt et al. 1993), where the gel aberrations are described as “shadow bands and/or ugly smears” and ascribed to insufficiently denaturing conditions. The problem may be analogous to that of “compression” seen on sequencing gels owing to the secondary structure of sequencing reaction products (Slatko et al. 1991). For example, hairpin loops can occur owing to the presence of dyad symmetry or regions of high GC content in the DNA fragments. The problem has previously been tackled by increasing the denaturing strength of gels with formamide (Litt et al. 1993; Slatko et al. 1991) and by running gels at the highest possible temperature (Slatko et al. 1991); and by chemical modification of cytosine bases so that they are less able to participate in hydrogen bonding to guanosine residues (Slatko et al. 1991). The gel formulation suggested by Applied Biosystems (PerkinElmer Corporation 1998; p 2–23) contains 6 M urea, 4% acrylamide, and no formamide. Given the renaturation problems previously encountered even in gels containing 8.3 M urea (Litt et al. 1993) and 9.5 M urea (Guldberg et al. 1994), the Applied Biosystems protocol may be expected to be insufficiently denaturing. We investigated these genotyping problems, using a twopronged approach. In the first approach we sought to determine whether sequence differences causing different Tms and different Correspondence to: S.J. Foote; E-mail: [email protected] susceptibility to formation of intra-strand loops were correlated with the occurrence of the problems and thus provide evidence that the effects were secondary to renaturation. In the second approach we determined whether the use of stronger denaturants in the gels would reduce the occurrence of the problems. The first approach entailed assessing a large number of amplicons generated from murine SSLP markers used in our laboratory for their susceptibility to renaturation effects. Then relative Tms of the double-stranded amplicons were calculated by using the terms of the Tm formula for a sequence of double-stranded DNA (Rychlik et al. 1990) dependent on the length and nucleotide composition of the DNA. It was found that markers more susceptible to presumed renaturation effects indeed had higher Tms. Relative Tms of sequences available for the formation of hairpin loops were also calculated and compared; no significant difference was observed. The second approach involved running PCR products from a selection of murine SSLP markers on a panel of gels of differing composition. Thus it was shown that the ABI protocol gels were contributing to the poor quality of genotyping data. Materials and methods Marker analysis. Computer programs were written in Perl. These programs used the PCR primer sequences and the MIT SSLP sequence data (Copeland et al. 1993; Dietrich et al. 1994, 1996) to determine the sequence of the PCR products. One program determined the GC content of the sequences. A second program searched for self-complementary regions within the individual strands of the PCR products. Since the exact formula for Tm in urea-based gels was unavailable, a formula was used that preserved the numerical relationship between Tms of different markers but that did not give a precise temperature. This was obtained by removing the terms of a standard Tm formula which are constant or account for salt concentration and which are, therefore, independent of the properties of the oligonucleotide under consideration. The resulting formula was: Tmmodified ⳱ (0.41)GC − 675/(length of sequence). The assumed renaturation effects occurred on a significant minority of gels. A difference in gel composition or running conditions was postulated to explain the sporadic nature of these effects. Only PCR products on gels exhibiting renaturation effects were subjected to analysis. The fluorescence signals due to PCR analysis of each SSLP marker on these gels was assessed by three criteria: retarded progress of PCR product through the gel; inconsistent allele positions; and poor resolution of peaks. Each criterion was assessed on a three-point scale, where zero indicated absence of the effect, 0.5 indicated occasional or mild presence of the effect, and 1 indicated that the criterion applied to the majority of PCR products owing to the particular SSLP marker on the gel under consideration. These three scores were summed to calculate a combined score for each SSLP marker. An average score was used where an SSLP marker appeared on multiple gels in the set under analysis. In total, 47 SSLP markers were analyzed. The markers were split into two groups, those with scores of 0–0.5 and those with scores greater than 0.5. Overall GC proportion, Tm of the double-stranded product, and Tm of the longest region complementary to a region on the same strand were compared by two-tailed Student’s t-tests, assuming equal variances between the two groups under consideration. 672 SSLP amplification and gel comparison. Polymerase chain reactions: Oligonucleotide primers corresponding to the SSLP markers D1Mit17, D1Mit111, D1Mit231, D4Mit111, D5Mit95, D8Mit4, D9Mit79, D13Mit64, D15Mit43, and D17Mit66 were used with genomic (BALB/c × C57BL/ 6)F1 DNA as the template. Touchdown PCRs (Don et al. 1991) were performed with an initial 95°C 3-min denaturation step, followed by the touchdown phase and then 35 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 50°C, 30 s at 72°C. The touchdown PCR technique combines an initial series of cycles with high annealing temperatures with a subsequent series of cycles employing a lower annealing temperature. This approach maximizes the ratio of specific to spurious product amplified without the necessity of performing amplifications under independent conditions for each pair of primers. PCR products were pooled prior to loading. The same products of the same set of PCRs were separated on all the gels. Gels: 70 l of each PCR product pool was added to 1.75 l Genescan 500 ROX standard (PE), 11.5 l deionized formamide (Amresco, Solon, Ohio) and 2.1 l loading buffer (PE). Denaturation and dehydration were performed for 15 min at 95°C, after which the samples were immediately placed on ice. Approximately 1.5 l of each sample was loaded onto each of seven differently formulated gels. The gels were formulated thus: (A) a gel similar to the ABI protocol gel, 6.0 M urea, 0% formamide, and 4.5% acrylamide; 4.5% acrylamide was used in preference to the 4.0% acrylamide recommended in the ABI protocol because it yields slightly better resolution for the small DNA products typically analyzed in genotyping experiments. Consequently all gels contained 4.5% acrylamide in addition to the other components; (B) and (C) 5.6 M urea and 32% formamide; (D) 7 M urea and 32% formamide; (E) 7 M urea and 20% formamide; (F) 5.6 M urea and 20% formamide; (G) and (H) 8 M urea and 0% formamide. Electrophoresis and data collection were performed on an ABI 377 sequenator (PE). Electrophoresis was performed with 1 × TBE running buffer and with a potential difference of 3.0 kV except for gels (H) and (C), which were electrophoresed at 3.5 and 4.0 kV respectively. Data analysis was performed with Genescan and Genotyper software (PE). Two-tailed Student’s t-tests, assuming equal variances between the groups under consideration, were used to test the null hypothesis that the alternative gel formulations gave genotypes of a quality different from those produced on Perkin-Elmer standard formulation gels. Results Marker analysis. Forty-seven markers were classified as either renaturing or non-renaturing on the basis of three criteria: retarded progress of PCR product through the gel; inconsistent mobility; and poor resolution of peaks. A trend towards a difference in GC proportions was observed (41.7% ± 5.2% (mean ± one standard deviation) in the non-renaturing group compared with 44.1% ± 7.0% in the renaturing group, giving a P value of 0.19). When ranked Tms were calculated by taking sequence length as well as GC proportion into account (but excluding the constant and electrolyte-dependent terms of the Tm formula), a difference in ranked Tm was seen (12.0 ± 2.1, compared with 13.6 ± 2.7 (mean ± one standard deviation, arbitrary units)), with a P-value of 0.027. In contrast, no difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the ranked Tm of sequences demonstrating dyad symmetry and therefore potentially able to contribute to a secondary structure within single strands (2.3, compared with 6.4, with standard deviations of 22.6 and 26.1 respectively), as indicated by the P-value of 0.57. Interestingly, two markers (D18Mit74 and D3Mit131), which had a tendency to renature but nevertheless had low ranked-Tm (6.9 and 7.6 respectively) for the entire sequence, had Tms of potential hairpin loop regions which were toward the upper end of the range (47 and 36). Gel comparison. Paired two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to compare the performance of the different gel compositions in separating amplicons generated by using 10 different dinucleotide repeat markers previously identified as being susceptible to renaturing problems. All the alternative gel protocols tried were superior to the Perkin Elmer protocol. The same scoring system used to R.C.A. Symons et al.: Microsatellite marker discrimination by PAGE Table 1. Summary of the statistical evidence for the benefits of alternative gel protocols. Gel Composition P-value Percentage affected lanes a b c d e f g 6 M urea, 0% formamide 5.6 M urea, 32% formamide Same as b, electrophoresed at 4.0 kV 7.0 M urea, 32% formamide 7.0 M urea, 20% formamide 5.6 M urea, 20% formamide 8.0 M urea, 0% formamide N/A 0.014 0.026 0.026 0.033 0.038 0.021 48 (n ⳱ 206) 0 (n ⳱ 180) 4.4 (n ⳱ 205) 0 (n ⳱ 220) 10.8 (n ⳱ 203) 8.6 (n ⳱ 209) 10.7 (n ⳱ 206) compare markers was also employed to compare the gel types. Each gel was given a score on each of the three criteria separately for each marker. An overall score was produced for each marker on each gel by adding the three component scores. The P-values for rejecting the null hypothesis of lack of difference between the alternative gel protocols and the Perkin-Elmer published protocol are presented in Table 1. The P values demonstrate a significant difference between all the alternative gel formulations and the Perkin-Elmer gel formulation. In addition, all the lanes for these ten markers with an easily discernible signal indicating the presence of specific PCR product were counted. Of these, all lanes with presumed renaturation artefacts were recorded. The percentage of lanes for each kind of gel that demonstrated renaturing problems and the total number of lanes counted are also shown in Table 1. All the markers were clearly legible and interpretable by using all the alternative gel protocols (Fig. 1). Clear differences were observed in the results with different gel protocols. Gels with superior denaturing properties consistently resolved the DNA fragments better. Not only did the enhanced denaturing gels deliver better resolution, but consequently individual PCR products passed the scanner over smaller time intervals, leading to an increase in the fluorescence intensity of the bands. Gels containing formamide were superior to those containing only urea as a denaturant. However, the routine use of formamide presents a safety hazard. In addition, lane tracking on the gels containing formamide was slightly more difficult owing to increased salt-related curvature effects. Higher concentrations of both formamide and urea caused the gels to run more slowly (Fig. 2). This imposes a throughput problem in that each ABI 377 sequenator is limited to running fewer gels per day. Since the power dissipation is lower when running gels containing formamide or higher concentrations of urea, the electrophoretic potential difference can be increased to achieve run-times comparable to those obtained with the standard ABI protocol. Discussion It has been found that the use of standard ABI formulation gels often leads to poor quality genotyping data. 8.0 M urea gels running at 3.5 kV give good throughput and adequate quality in most circumstances. 7.0 M urea and 32% formamide gels running at 4.0 kV have been demonstrated to give the same throughput with even less renaturation artefact, but the safety problems with formamide must be considered. It has been shown that renaturation artefacts are especially a problem when using markers where the amplicons possess particularly high Tms. It is particularly important to use gels with greater denaturing properties than the standard Perkin-Elmer protocol when analyzing these fragments. Day-to-day use in our laboratory has demonstrated that the enhanced denaturing gels are extremely beneficial for increasing the accuracy of allele identification when genotyping, especially when alleles are narrowly separated. The advantage of these gels is particularly pronounced when there is a need for quantification, Fig. 1. Traces showing identical PCR products for the markers D9Mit79 and D1Mit17 run on gels of seven different compositions. Fig. 2. Rate of PCR product collection by using gels of differing formulations and with different electrophoresis potential differences. 674 such as when assessing states of allelic imbalance or partial loss of heterozygosity and when quantifying copy numbers of bacterial artificial chromosome transgenic inserts. Acknowledgments. The authors thank Ms. R.A. Burt for technical assistance. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. References Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Nadeau JH, Eppig JT et al. (1993) Genome maps IV 1993. Wall chart [see comments]. Science 262, 67–82 Dietrich WF, Miller JC, Steen RG, Merchant M, Damron D et al. (1994) A genetic map of the mouse with 4,006 simple sequence length polymorphisms [see comments]. Nat Genet 7, 220–245 Dietrich WF, Miller J, Steen R, Merchant MA, Damron-Boles D et al. (1996) A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome [see comments] [published erratum appears in Nature 1996 May 9;381(6578): 172]. Nature 380, 149–5 R.C.A. Symons et al.: Microsatellite marker discrimination by PAGE Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS (1991) ‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 19, 4008 Guldberg P, Henriksen KF, Guttler F (1994) Constant denaturant gel electrophoresis without formamide. Biotechniques 16, 786–788 Litt M, Hauge X, Sharma V (1993) Shadow bands seen when typing polymorphic dinucleotide repeats: some causes and cures. Biotechniques 15, 280–284 Perkin-Elmer Corporation (1988) ABI Prism 377 DNA Sequencer XL Upgrade: User’s Manual (Foster City, Calif.: Perkin-Elmer) Rychlik W, Spencer WJ, Rhoads RE (1990) Optimization of the annealing temperature for DNA amplification in vitro [published erratum appears in Nucleic Acids Res 1991 Feb 11;19(3):698]. Nucleic Acids Res 18, 6409–6412 Slatko BE, Albright LM, Tabor S (1991) DNA sequencing by the dideoxy method. In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F.M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R.E. Kingston, D.D. Moore, J.G. Seidman et al., eds. (New York: John Wiley and Sons), pp. 7.4.1–7.4.27