Download Gene Targeting by the Vitamin D Response Element Binding Protein

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Interferon wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Hedgehog signaling pathway wikipedia , lookup

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

SULF1 wikipedia , lookup

Biochemical cascade wikipedia , lookup

MTOR wikipedia , lookup

Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Gene Targeting by the Vitamin D Response Element Binding Protein Reveals a Role for Vitamin D in Osteoblast
mTOR Signaling
1
1
Lisse, T S; 1,2Adams, J S; 1,2Hewison, M
Orthopaedic Hospital Research Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; 2Molecular Biology Institute, UCLA, Los
Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
[email protected]
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION:
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) C1/C2 plays a
pivotal role in vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling by acting as a
vitamin D response element-binding protein (VDRE-BP) (1,2).
Transcriptional regulation by the active form of vitamin D3, 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) involves occupancy of VDRE by
VDRE-BP or 1,25(OH)2D3-bound VDR. This relationship is disrupted
by over-expression of VDRE-BP and can result in a form of human
hereditary vitamin D-resistant rickets (HVDRR) (3). In other words,
over abundance of VDRE-BP requires that much higher levels of
1,25(OH)2D3 are necessary to displace the chromatin-bound VDRE-BP
to promote VDR signaling. To date studies of the interaction between
VDRE-BP and VDR-mediated signaling have been restricted to analysis
of CYP24A1, a classical target gene for VDR. To provide a broader
perspective on the role of VDRE-BP as a determinant of vitamin D
function we compared the mRNA expression profiles of control and
HVDRR cells, allowing us to identify genes with dysregulated response
to 1,25(OH)2D3. Genes defined in this way were then assessed for
1,25(OH)2D3 and VDRE-BP sensitivity in bone-forming osteoblastic
cells, thereby shedding light on the mechanisms by which VDRE-BP
over-expression in a human subject is associated with rachitic bone
disease. Data presented in this study provide further evidence of a role
for VDRE-BP as a pivotal component of the machinery required for
1,25(OH)2D3-mediated transregulation.
METHODS:
GeneChip® Human Gene 1.0 ST DNA microarrays (Affymetrix Inc.)
were processed by the UCLA DNA Microarray Core Facility. Data was
obtained from biological duplicates and analyzed using the Affymetrix
Expression Console™ software. Detection of statistically significant
regulated genes, heatmaps and clustering were performed in
CARMAweb (carmaweb.genome.tugraz.at/carma). Microarray data has
been submitted to GEO (Accession Nr. GSE22523). The human DDIT4
ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA and control reagents were
purchased from Thermo Scientific. Cells were transfected using the
siPORTTM amine transfection agent (Applied Biosystems). ChIP
experiments were performed using the ChIP-IT Express™ kit by Active
Motif and the ChampionChIP™ (SABiosciences Inc.) kit. Enriched
genomic DNA was measured by qPCR using ChampionChIP™ qPCR
primer assays.
RESULTS SECTION:
Data defined a sub-cluster of 114 genes induced or suppressed (>1.5fold) in WT cells after exposure to 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D3. Of these, 113
were rendered insensitive to 1,25(OH)2D3 by over-expression of VDREBP in the HVDRR cells. Using a selection of these genes, further
studies were carried out to determine whether over-expression of
VDRE-BP also suppressed 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated transcription in
human osteoblastic cells. Prominent amongst the VDRE-BP-regulated,
1,25(OH)2D3-responsive genes identified in osteoblast-like cells was
DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4 (DDIT4), an inhibitor of the
mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. Chromatin
immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays using 1,25(OH)2D3-treated
osteoblasts confirmed that liganded VDR and VDRE-BP compete for
binding to the proximal promoter region of the DDIT4 gene in a similar
fashion to that observed for other 1,25(OH)2D3 target genes such as
CYP24A1. A role for 1,25(OH)2D3-induced DDIT4 expression in
regulating mTOR signaling was confirmed by 1,25(OH)2D3-induced
suppression of phosphorylated S6K1T389 protein (a downstream target of
mTOR). The functional importance for 1,25(OH)2D3 responses in
osteoblasts was underlined by the fact that siRNA knockdown of DDIT4
expression suppressed antiproliferative responses to 1,25(OH)2D3. These
data confirm that VDRE-BP is an important component of the
transcriptional apparatus required for normal 1,25(OH)2D3-VDRmediated transcription and cell function. Conversely, over-expression of
VDRE-BP exerts a dominant-negative effect on transcription of many
1,25(OH)2D3-target genes.
DISCUSSION:
Characterization of VDRE-BP action in 1,25(OH)2D3-treated osteoblasts
highlights an entirely novel role for vitamin D as a regulator of mTOR –
a known ‘master regulator’ of cell function. DDIT4 (also known as
regulated in development and DNA damage response 1 [REDD1])
affects apoptotic/differentiation outcome by repressing the mTOR
signaling pathway that regulates cell cycle progression, growth and
metabolism homeostasis, protein synthesis, ribosome biogenesis, the
actin cytoskeleton and autophagy (4). mTOR is a member of the
phosphoinositol kinase-related kinase family whose induction is
regulated by phosphorylation by protein kinase B (AKT) in response to
insulin, growth factor and nutrient stimulation. The mTORC1 is induced
by AKT which phosphorylates and inhibits TSC1/2, leading to
downstream effects on protein synthesis and cell proliferation.
By contrast, DDIT4 affects mTOR outcome by acting as a repressor of
the signaling pathway through tuberin, the product of the TSC2 gene.
DDIT4 was originally shown to be induced in response to a variety of
cellular stresses, including hypoxia, or agents that cause DNA damage.
Suppression of DDIT4 by microRNA (miR) 221 has been linked to
hepatocarcinogenesis in vivo (5), highlighting a potential role as a
tumor suppressor. Data presented here suggest that 1,25(OH)2D3
regulates the mTOR pathway downstream of growth factor-AKT by
targeting DDIT4. Crucially, knockdown experiments indicate that
expression of DDIT4 is essential for the osteoblastic cell proliferation
and growth activity of 1,25(OH)2D3. The proposed model for vitamin Dinduced osteoblastic DDIT4 and associated suppression of mTOR may
also provide a novel mechanism for the rachitic bone disease in the
human subject with abnormally high levels of VDRE-BP. In view of the
broad capacity for suppression of 1,25(OH)2D3-VDR signaling by
VDRE-BP it is likely that many other genes associated with mineral
homeostasis and bone metabolism will be affected. Data from the
current study highlight suppression of osteocalcin by VDRE-BP, but
other more novel targets from our array analysis may also be involved.
REFERENCES:
1) Chen H, Hu B, Allegretto EA, & Adams JS (2000) The vitamin D
response element-binding protein. A novel dominant-negative regulator
of vitamin D directed transactivation. J Biol Chem 275(45):3555735564.
2) Chen H, Hewison M, & Adams JS (2006) Functional characterization
of heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein C1/C2 in vitamin D
resistance: a novel response element-binding protein. J Biol Chem
281(51):39114-39120.
3) Hewison M, et al. (1993) Tissue resistance to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin
D without a mutation of the vitamin D receptor gene. Clin Endocrinol
(Oxf) 39(6):663-670.
4) Foster KG & Fingar DC (2010) Mammalian target of rapamycin
(mTOR): conducting the cellular signaling symphony. (Translated from
eng) J Biol Chem 285(19):14071-14077 (in eng).
5) Pineau P, et al. (2010) miR-221 overexpression contributes to liver
tumorigenesis. (Translated from eng) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
107(1):264-269 (in eng).
Paper No. 139 • ORS 2011 Annual Meeting