Download Reducing Mud Problems in Cattle Heavy Use Areas with Coal

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Reducing Mud Problems in Cattle Heavy Use Areas with Coal
Combustion ByProducts
Karl VanDevender, Jodie Pennington, Mike Andrews, and Danny Griffin,
University of Arkansas, Cooperative Extension Service
Coal combustion products are very variable in reactivity and therefore
ability to set into a firm load-supporting surface. Bottom ashes typically have
already had water added, and therefore have very little reactivity left. They should
be thought of as a filler or bulking material to mix with fly ash. Fly ashes have not
had water added and are therefore still reactive. The level of reactivity varies with
both the coal being burned and the management of the combustion facility.
The two basic approaches to using fly ashes are 1) to build a pad on the
ground surface with a blend of ashes, and 2) to mix fly ash with the soil as an
amendment. Due to the difficulty with soil mixing, it is not generally
recommended. Typically, the end user is better off to have the supplier deliver a
blend of 70% bottom ash and 30% fly ash (volumetric ratio). This mix makes a
material with a soil-like consistency that is easy to transport and handle at the
application site. If the supplier won't supply a premixed material, it can be mixed
on site. For maximum strength moisture must be added and the ash compacted
as the pad is built.