Download Ecological effects of habitat fragmentation and edge creation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Introduced species wikipedia , lookup

Conservation movement wikipedia , lookup

Conservation biology wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup

Extinction wikipedia , lookup

Bifrenaria wikipedia , lookup

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Wildlife crossing wikipedia , lookup

Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup

Extinction debt wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Decline in amphibian populations wikipedia , lookup

Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Source–sink dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Ecological effects of habitat fragmentation and edge creation
Dr. Peter Minchin
Department of Biological Sciences
Habitat fragmentation involves both a reduction in the total area of habitat and a change
of configuration into smaller and more isolated patches, embedded in a highly altered
matrix. The phenomenon is complex and largely system-specific, but some
generalizations about the biological consequences of fragmentation are starting to emerge
from research in conservation biology. There is generally an inverse relationship
between the number of extinctions in fragments and their area: larger fragments have a
lower rate of extinction than smaller ones. A group of smaller fragments loses more
species than a single fragment of equivalent total area. Equally important as the
reduction is area is that the fragments become isolated. Movement of species among
patches is inhibited by the intervening matrix or the existence of barriers such as roads.
Isolation of populations in small patches has negative genetic effects, including
inbreeding depression and the loss of variation. The boundary of a habitat fragment is
not sharp. Rather, there is an edge zone of varying width for different factors. In forests,
the altered environment of the edge zone favors shade intolerant plant species at the
expense of the forest dominants and can also favor the proliferation of invasive species.
Since the perimeter of a polygon decreases more slowly than its area, smaller patches
have a larger ratio of edge to interior. Patches below a certain area may be essentially all
edge, with no core habitat remaining. The deleterious effects of edges on biodiversity
contradict the idea promoted by some wildlife managers that “edge is good”. Most
terrestrial game species in the USA (e.g. white-tailed deer) are edge-adapted animals
whose populations respond positively to the amount of edge.