Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA ANNEXURE-II PROFORMA FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR DISSERTATION Sl.no 1. Name of the Candidate and Dr.V.V. VINAY KUMAR TUMMIDI Address TUMMIDI BROTHERS JAGADAMBA CENTRE, VISHAKAPTNAM , ANDHRA PRADESH. NAVODAYA EDUCATION TRUST’S 2. Name of the Institution NAVODAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE, RAICHUR- 584103 3. Course of Study and Subject POST GRADUATE DEGREE IN M.S. Otorhinolaryngology (3 YEARS) 4. Date of Admission to course 31th MAY 201 Title of the topic A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MYRINGOPLASTY VERSUS 5. TYMPANOPLASTY TYPE I WITH MASTOIDECTOMY IN PATIENTS ATTENDING NAVODAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAICHUR. 6. Brief Resume of the Intended Work As Ear discharge is one of the most common complaint encountered by an otorhinolaryngologist in their day to day practice and most of the case attributed to Chronic Serous Otitis Media (CSOM) which are of 2 types- safe and unsafe, out of which safe variety comprises of infection of mucosa of the middle ear cleft with discharge and central perforation were taken for the present study. The aim of surgical intervention in safe CSOM, being the restoration of hearing by reconstruction of the central perforation where the ossicular chain is intact by Myringoplasty or by Type I Tympanoplasty. This study evaluates the Effectiveness of cortical mastoidectomy in terms of hearing and graft uptake when combined with myringoplasty as compared to myringoplasty alone. Mastoid cavity buffers the effect of pressure changes in the middle ear by supplying air to the middle ear. The capacity of this system is its volume. Increased mastoid pneumatization enhances the ability to regulate middle ear pressure. The mean volume of air in the mastoid air cell system could be about 5-8 ml. The chances of obtaining a dry and self cleaning ear are over 80%, but the success rate varies between cases. Often, the hearing is worse after mastoidectomy, since the goal is primarily to eradicate the disease, rather than preserve hearing. However, occasionally the hearing may improve as well. Hearing reconstruction is often delayed because it is necessary to rebuild the bones of hearing at a future date. Normal mastoid air cell system is an air reservoir and also an active cavity having gas exchange capability independent of Eustachian tube. Air cell system is capable of gas exchange by sub mucosal capillary network Because gas exchange occurs in cellular mucosa, total area of mucosal surface affects gas exchange rate. It has been shown that mastoid cellular system works like an air reservoir. When the air volume changes in the middle ear, mastoid air cell system minimize the effects of pressure changes by adding air to the middle ear. Thus it works like a pressure buffering system. Therefore in well pneumatized ears, the buffering function is doing more efficiently. 6.1 Need for the Study: The Purpose of this study is to ascertain whether the mastoidectomy should be combined as a standard operating procedure for Type I Tympanoplasty in safe type of chronic suppurative otitis media, so as to achieve the near normal physiology of the ear and to lessen the graft rejection rate. 6.2 Review of Literature: The first myringoplasty, including removal of epithelium and grafting of skin was done by Berthold in 1878. Blake in 1887 used a paper patch for perforations of the tympanic membrane, and Joynt proposed the use of cautery and patches for defect of the drumhead in 1919.¹ Prior to introduction of antibiotics mastoidectomy for acute inflammatory disease In 1649, Riolanus first described mastoid surgery to relieve obstruction of the eustachian tube and tinnitus, and Petit in 1736 was the first to perform successfully a mastoid operation for mastoiditis.¹ Ortegren in 1967 presented a paper on the result of myringoplasty carried out since 1957 by various eminent otologists like Zollner, Wright, Heerman et al etc. based on the extensive study he concluded that connective tissue grafts i.e. fascia are superior to skin grafts in myringoplasty and the results of myringoplasty performed on patients above 40 years were not so good as those below this limit. He also noticed that reperforations within occurred 6 months in most cases at follow up and the role of mastoid cellularity in myringoplasties were not clear in these studies.2 Of all these grafting materials, the most effective have been those from connective tissue. While each type of graft has its own advocates, the temporalis fascia graft is by far the most popular and has become the standard to which all other materials are compared today.3 Holmquist and others studied 31 cases of chronic otitis media. The ears were selected preoperatively on the basis of the size of mastoid air cell system and function of the eustachian tube. They concluded that there is a need to have an air reservoir connected with the middle ear for the treatment of patients with poor tubal function. Therefore, obliteration of the mastoid cavity in middleear surgery should be avoided.4 Wehrs and others observed that in order to achieve a good hearing result following tympanoplasty, it is necessary to maintain an aerated middle ear space.5 Poor Eustachian tube function is most commonly blamed in cases of failure to obtain an adequately aerated middle ear following tympanoplasty. Although this may be the true aetiology in some cases, middle ear adhesions, loss of support of the posterior canal wall and inadvertent blockage of the eustachian tube orifice by graft material may be contributing factors. Aeration of the mastoidectomy cavity is also important to prevent collapse of the posterior canal wall, retraction pockets and ensure an adequate air reserve.5 The most limited form of chronic inflammatory ear disease is the perforated tympanic membrane, which usually does not require mastoid operation. The most prevalent form of disease is chronic otitis media with otorrhoea but no cholesteatoma.6 Hegde and colleagues did a prospective study which consisted of 100 patients with unilateral middle ear pathologies over a period of 24 months. Bilateral x-ray mastoids (laws view) were taken for all the patients. The area was measured by using planimetry. They observed a statistically significant difference in the area of the diseased ears in chronic suppurative otitis media tubotympanic type of duration less then 5yr and more than 5 year groups but not in the healthy sides. This proves that there is a definite relation between the area of the mastoid air cells and the duration of the middle ear disease. They concluded that the decreased pneumatization in patients with middle ear disease is secondary to the chronic inflammation and not due to otitis media in infancy or congenital causes. Hypocellularity is an affect but not the cause of middle ear pathologies. This study proved that there is a definite relation between the area of the mastoid air cells and the duration of middle ear disease.7 Yung studied hearing gain in relation to the perforation site. He included the patients who had an intact tympanic membrane one year following the surgery. One hundred perforations of the tympanic membrane with successful myringoplasties were reviewed. A partially reversible impairment of bone conduction was noted, being more obvious in posterior and subtotal perforations. It was also shown that the site of perforation affects the degree of hearing loss and the degree of subsequent improvement after myringoplasty, marginal and malleolar perforations had a greater hearing loss and less post operative hearing improvement then central and non malleolar perforations 8 . It was also shown that posterior perforations had a greater hearing loss then anterior perforations.9 Sharp Terzis and Robinson studied in 47 patients with either an anterior or subtotal perforation of tympanic membrane extending up to the anterior annulus margin.10 Their experience with Kerr flap, an underlay graft fashioned to include a tag of fascia which is placed laterally under the annulus and the anterior meatal skin, is presented. This method gave a 97.5% closure rate with no cases of anterior marginal blunting and a mean auditory threshold gain of 8.5dB was achieved at the frequencies tested. They concluded that use of the Kerr flap is recommended when repairing the anteriorly placed tympanic membrane perforation.10 Emmett studied 260 cases of Type I tympanoplasties to determine whether age is a factor in healing. He concluded that age is not a factor in success or failure of healing following tympanoplasty surgery.11 How the size of the temporalis fascia alters with its state of hydration was reported by England, Strachen and Buckley. The size of 20 temporalis fascia grafts were measured when fresh and again after flattening and allowing them to dry, and finally after rehydrating the grafts with 0.9% saline solution. They noted significant shrinkage. They proposed that the cause of increased failure rates, particularly in anterior myringoplasties, is the loss of underlay due to graft rehydration and shrinkage. Thus they concluded that graft shrinkage should be considered when positioning the graft.12 Tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy is indicated for chronic ear disease process such as tympanic membrane perforation resulting from previous middle ear infections.13 6.3 Objective of the Study: 1. To evaluate the surgical outcomes of myringoplasty in comparison of Type I Tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy in terms of improvement in Hearing and graft uptake 2. To know how far mastoidectomy is needed in safe type of chronic suppurative otitis media. 3. To form a common consensus regarding the surgical management of chronic suppurative otitis media. 7. 7.1 Materials and Methods: Prospective study of 60 patients attending the ENT OPD of Navodaya Medical College and Research Centre with history of ear discharge and clinical examination who were diagnosed as Chronic Suppurative Otitis media were taken for the present study for a period of one and half years from October 2012 to July 2014. Method of collection of Data : 7.2 Study Area: Hospital Based (Navodaya Medical College Hospital and Research Centre) Design of study: A Prospective Study. Sampling technique: 60 Patients selected on Simple Random Selection Technique. Sample collection study shall include 60 patients with history of ear discharge, attending ENT outpatient department in Navodaya medical college hospital and research centre, Raichur over a period of one half years from October 2012 to July 2014. This study includes 60 patients of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media safe type in Inactive or Quiescent stage. All these cases will be operated during a period of one and a half years from October 2012 to July 2014 in the Department of ENT, Navodaya medical college. A detailed history followed by Complete clinical examination will be undertaken and the patients were randomly grouped in to Group A and Group B consisting of 30 cases each. 30 cases (Group A) will be selected for myringoplasty alone and 30 cases (Group B) will be selected for type 1 tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy. Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age>15 years and <60years. 2. Tubotympanic type of CSOM central, subtotal perforation. 3. Mild and moderate Conductive hearing loss. 4. Eustachian Tube should be patent. 5. Quiescent and Inactive Stage of CSOM. Exclusion criteria: 1. Age <15years and> 60 years. 2. Atticoantral type of CSOM marginal and attic perforation. 3. Profound hearing loss. 4. Previous major ear surgery. 5. Eustachian Tube Obstruction. 6. Patient with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. 7. Active Stage of Infection of the Ear. 8. CSOM with intracranial Complications. Data Analysis: Data collected will be entered on excel spread sheet after coding and further processed using SPSS Version 17.0 (Statistical package for social sciences). The data analysis will be done by computing proportions, mean of standard deviation. Appropriate test of significance will be used based on type of data. A p value <0.05 will be considered significant. Does the study require any investigation or intervention or 7.3 investigation to be conducted on patients or other humans and animals? Yes , My study involves Investigation like Hemoglobin, Total count, Differential leucocyte Count, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, Bleeding time, Clotting time, Random Blood Sugar, Blood Urea, Serum Creatinine, Urine Routine Special Investigations like Bilateral Mastoid X-ray, Pure Tone Audiometry, Diagnostic Otoendoscopy, Computed Tomography Scan . Surgery: Examination under microscope, Myringoplasty or Tympanoplasty Type I with Cortical Mastoidectomy. Has Ethical Clearance been obtained from your institution in 7.4 case of 7.3? YES, Ethical Clearance been obtained from the institution. 8 List of References: 1. Otolaryngology By- Paperalla, Shumrick, Gluckman, Meyerhoff, 3rd Edition, Volume 2, Pg- 1410. 2. Ortegren. Myringoplasty. Acta Otolaryngology. Suppl: 193, 1-41. 3. Rizer FM. overlay versus underlay Tympanoplasty. Part 1: Historical review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107: 1-23. 4. Holmquist J and Bergstrom B. The mastoid air cell system in ear surgery. Arch otolaryngology.1978; 104:127-9. 5. Wehrs RE, Tulsa OK. Aeration of the middle ear and mastoid in tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1981; 91: 1463-7. 6. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery By- Charles W Cummings, John M Fredrickson, Lee A Harker, Charles J Krause, Mark A Richardson, David E Schuller, 3rd edition, Volume 4, Pg-3120. 7. Hedge MC, Kamath MP, Kumar S, Kumar A and Chandra S. A study of mastoidcellularity and middle ear diseases. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2004; 10:6-9. 8. Yung MW. Myringoplasty: Hearing gain in relation to perforation site. 1983; 97: 11-7. 9. Adkins WY, White B and Charleston SC. Laryngoscope. 1984; 94: 916-8. 10. Sharp JF, Terzis TF and Robinson J. Myringoplasty for the anterior perforation: Experience with Kerr flap. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 1992; 106: 14-6. 11. Emmett JR. Age as a factor in the success of tympanoplasty: A comparison of outcomes in the young and old. ENT – Ear, Nose and Throat Journal. 1999; 78: 480-3. 12. England RJ, Strachan DR and Buckley JG. Temporalis fascia graft shrink. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 1997; 111: 707-8. 13. Surgery of the Ear by- Glascock and Gulya, 5th Edition, Volume 3, Pg-229. (6):592-5. 9. Signature of the candidate 10. Remarks of the Guide RECOMMENDED AND FORWARDED 11. 11.1 Name And Designation of Guide Dr. S R HEGDE PROFESSOR AND HEAD DEPARTMENT OF ENT, NAVODAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAICHUR 11.2 Signature 11.3 Co-Guide (if any) 11.4 Signature 11.5 Head of Department Dr. S R HEGDE PROFESSOR AND HEAD DEPARTMENT OF ENT, NAVODAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAICHUR 11.6 Signature 12 12.1 Remarks of Chairman and Principal. 12.2 Signature STUDY SUBJECT CONSENT STATEMENT TITLE OF THE STUDY: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MYRINGOPLASTY VERSUS TYMPANOPLASTY TYPE I WITH MASTOIDECTOMY IN PATIENTS ATTENDING NAVODAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAICHUR. GUIDE: DR. SR HEGDE HOD AND PROFESSOR OF ENT PG STUDENT Dr.V.V. VINAY KUMAR TUMMIDI NAVODAYA MEDICAL COLLEGE RAICHUR I confirm that investigator has explained to me the purpose of study, study procedure that I will undergo and possible risks and discomforts as well as benefits that I may experience in my own language. I understand this study consists of exposure to radiation and invasive procedures. I understand that medical information produced by this will be subjected to confidentiality. I have been explained all the above in detail in my own language and I understand the same. Therefore, I agree to give my consent to participate as a subject in the research project. Signature of witness subject Date: Signature of the Date: