Download Conversion Deafness Presenting as Sudden Hearing Loss

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Treatments for combat-related PTSD wikipedia , lookup

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders wikipedia , lookup

Rumination syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Generalized anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup

Factitious disorder imposed on another wikipedia , lookup

Diagnosis of Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Glossary of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup

Externalizing disorders wikipedia , lookup

Dissociative identity disorder wikipedia , lookup

Munchausen by Internet wikipedia , lookup

Treatment of bipolar disorder wikipedia , lookup

Conversion disorder wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CASE REPORT
Conversion Deafness Presenting
as Sudden Hearing Loss
Ying-Piao Wang1, Mao-Che Wang2,3, Hung-Ching Lin1*, Kuo-Sheng Lee1
1
Department of Otolaryngology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 2Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Veterans
3
General Hospital, and National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Conversion deafness is a somatoform disorder characterized by hearing loss without an anatomic or pathophysiologic
lesion. Clinically, discrepancies between behavior hearing thresholds and objective electrophysiologic examinations,
such as impedance audiometry, otoacoustic emissions (OAE), and auditory brainstem response (ABR), will raise
the suspicion of this disorder. It is judged to be due to psychological factors and that patients do not intentionally
produce the symptom. Conversion deafness is sometimes reported in children but is extremely rare among adults.
Two young adults with this disease are presented. These 2 patients were both under enormous stress from the
national entrance examinations for universities. Pure tone audiometry showed bilateral hearing deterioration, but
OAE and ABR were normal. The hearing of both patients recovered after treatment. The diagnosis, prognosis and
treatment of this disorder are also discussed. It is important to discover the psychological stress in patients with
conversion deafness. This report aims to increase awareness of this condition and avoid unnecessary steroid use
in its treatment. [J Chin Med Assoc 2006;69(6):289–293]
Key Words: conversion, somatoform disorder, sudden hearing loss
Introduction
The nomenclative terms of non-organic hearing loss
(NOHL), functional hearing loss, and pseudohypacusis
are synonyms that describe the audiometric discrepancies
between the real hearing threshold and the measured
threshold of the patient in the absence of any organic
disease.1,2 These general terms cover hearing loss in
distinct categories: conscious malingering, factitious
disorder, and conversion deafness.3
Malingering refers to an intentional feigning of
illness for self-gain, such as financial compensation or
drugs, to win a lawsuit, or to avoid military service.2
Factitious illness may represent the deliberate or
intentional feigning of physical or psychological symptoms to assume the role of the sick.2 Therefore, the
gain of this behavior is intrapsychiatric rather than
external compensation. In a minority of cases, NOHL
is derived from a conversion disorder, conversion
deafness, which is a psychological defense mechanism
whereby an unconscious psychological need is
translated into physical defect.
The aim of this report is to increase awareness of
this condition and demonstrate 2 cases of conversion
deafness that resulted from stress from national university entrance examinations. The diagnosis, prognosis
and treatment of this disorder are also discussed.
Case Reports
Case 1
A 20-year-old female, who was taking supplementary
classes to help pass the examinations, was referred to
our hospital for sudden-onset bilateral hearing loss
associated with vertigo 4 days ago. Her previous medical history was unremarkable. On physical examination, the patient was weak, apathetic and nonchalant. She also expressed no interest in having contact
with relatives or anyone in the external environment.
*Correspondence to: Dr. Hung-Ching Lin, Department of Otolaryngology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92, Section
2, Chung-Shan North Road, Taipei 104, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Received: August 12, 2005
Accepted: January 17, 2006
E-mail: [email protected]
•
J Chin Med Assoc • June 2006 • Vol 69 • No 6
©2006 Elsevier. All rights reserved.
•
289
Y.P. Wang, et al
Hz
A
125
250
500
1K
2K
4K
8K
2K
4K
8K
2K
4K
8K
–10
0
10
20
30
dB HL
40
50
55
60
70
80
90
100
110
Hz
B
125
250
500
125
250
500
1K
–10
0
10
20
30
40
dB HL
Otoscopy revealed normal tympanic membranes. There
was no spontaneous or gaze nystagmus with fixation.
Audiometry showed bilateral total deafness, even under
120 dB HL stimulation (Figure 1A). An acoustic
reflex test was not performed on admission day 1
because it might aggravate the patient’s vertigo. She
passed the distortion product otoacoustic emissions
(DPOAE) examination (Figure 2A).
On admission day 3, a follow-up audiogram showed
a 55–65 dB improvement in hearing bilaterally (Figure 1B). Acoustic reflex thresholds were within normal limits. Evidence of repeatable waveforms at 30
dB hearing level bilaterally was detected on auditory
brainstem response (ABR) (Figure 2B). These discrepancies in the electrophysiologic auditory tests
(ABR and DPOAE) and the behavior hearing threshold led to the possibility of NOHL.
A psychiatric consultation was begun and the patient
confessed that she had gotten poor marks in the joint
entrance examination for the institutes of technology.
She was afraid of hearing of her failure in the examination. Sudden onset of hearing loss and vertigo
developed 3 days before the results of the examination
were announced. NOHL associated with a major
psychological stressor established the diagnosis of
conversion deafness. She returned to normal hearing
threshold on admission day 7 (Figure 1C). At 6 years
of follow-up, there was still no recurrence of the
psychological hearing abnormality.
50
55
60
70
80
Case 2
290
90
100
110
Hz
C
1K
–10
0
10
20
30
40
dB HL
A 19-year-old girl in her last year of high school
presented to our department with a complaint of
sudden bilateral hearing loss lasting for 2 weeks. She
denied tinnitus and had no vertigo. Physical examination showed normal tympanic membranes. The
pure-tone audiogram (PTA) revealed a flat 55-dB HL
sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally (Figure 3A).
Speech reception threshold was at 50 dB on the right
and 45 dB on the left. Acoustic reflex thresholds were
normal. A tentative diagnosis of bilateral sudden deafness was made.
The patient refused hospitalization, and steroid
therapy was begun with oral methylprednisolone 24
mg every 12 hours. Bed rest at home and return
consultation in 48 hours were recommended. Upon
returning, she continued to complain of bilateral
hearing loss. Repeat PTA showed similar results, with
good intra- and intertest consistency. On the same
day, she passed the transiently evoked otoacoustic
emissions (TEOAE) examination and 20 dB hearing
level was detected on ABR bilaterally. These data
suggested the possibility of NOHL.
50
55
60
70
80
90
100
110
Figure 1. Pure-tone audiogram of Case 1 on: (A) admission day
1; (B) admission day 3; and (C) admission day 7.
J Chin Med Assoc • June 2006 • Vol 69 • No 6
Conversion deafness in young adults
A
B
Figure 2. (A) Distortion product
otoacoustic emissions of Case
1 on admission day 1. (B) Auditory brainstem response of
Case 1 on admission day 3.
J Chin Med Assoc • June 2006 • Vol 69 • No 6
291
Y.P. Wang, et al
A
Discussion
Hz
125
250
500
1K
2K
4K
8K
–10
0
10
20
30
dB HL
40
50
55
60
70
80
90
100
110
B
Hz
125
250
500
1K
2K
4K
8K
–10
0
10
20
30
dB HL
40
50
55
60
70
80
90
100
110
Figure 3. Pure-tone audiogram of Case 2 on: (A) admission day
1; and (B) admission day 11.
Methylprednisolone was tapered. During this
interview, the patient stated that she was under
enormous tension due to the national joint entrance
examinations for universities. She had a conflict with
her teacher and suffered from sudden hearing loss
thereafter. The diagnosis of conversion deafness was
made. Accurate reassurance with a positive emphasis
on improving her hearing in the future was started.
On the 11th day after intervention, the patient admitted to having normal hearing bilaterally (Figure 3B).
Speech reception threshold was consistent with normal hearing bilaterally (20 dB).
292
Conversion disorder is a somatoform disorder
characterized by 1 or more symptoms or deficits
affecting the sensory or voluntary motor function
without any anatomic or pathophysiologic lesion to
explain the symptoms. It is often due to psychological
factors because the initiation or exacerbation of the
illness is preceded by conflicts or stressors. Patients
who suffer conversion symptoms do not intentionally
produce or feign such symptoms (DSM-IV-TR
Somatoform Disorders Diagnostic Criteria). They
experience the symptoms as genuine.
The exact prevalence of conversion disorder is not
known. The estimated range is 11/100,000 to 300/
100,000 of the general population, and it is more
common in females, with ratios from 2:1 to 10:1.4 The
exact prevalence of conversion deafness is only a small
fraction of this disease entity. Furthermore, conversion
deafness is encountered more in children and seldom
1
reported in adults.
There is no consistent audiometric configuration
or pattern for patients with NOHL.5 The diagnosis
of conversion deafness relies on discrepancies between behavior hearing thresholds and objective
electrophysiologic examinations such as impedance
audiometry, OAE and ABR. Furthermore, one must
rule out both malingering and factitious illness.
Malingering refers to the purposeful and intentional
feigning of illness for self-gain. These patients may
wish to gain financial compensation, win a lawsuit, or
avoid military service.2 Factitious illness, on the other
hand, may represent the intentional feigning of physical
or psychological symptoms to assume the sick role
itself, thereby rewarding intrapsychiatric gain.2 The
factitious disorder is distinguished from malingering
in terms of motivation, which comes from external
incentives in the latter. Finally, we may diagnose a
patient as having conversion deafness with reasonable
confidence.
Regarding the first patient (Case 1), she was afraid
of hearing of her failure on the enrollment examination for the institutes of technology. The sudden hearing loss may be a symbolic resolution to cope with
enormous subconscious psychological conflict in or4
der to relieve anxiety. This deep-seated conflict may
be out of the patient’s consciousness during the conversion procedure. In Case 2, our review revealed no
discrepancy between PTA and speech reception
thresholds, which has been demonstrated in 66–91%
of NOHL cases.6 NOHL was not suspected initially in
Case 2, and oral steroid was prescribed for this patient
as for idiopathic sudden deafness. This incorrect ten-
J Chin Med Assoc • June 2006 • Vol 69 • No 6
Conversion deafness in young adults
tative diagnosis led to unnecessary steroid treatment.
Therefore, for sudden hearing loss in young adults or
children, conversion deafness should be considered to
avoid such unnecessary treatment.
Conversion disorder usually develops abruptly and
lasts a relatively short time. Spontaneous recovery is
found in approximately 95% of cases, usually within 2
weeks.4 Our 2 patients recovered in 11 and 25 days,
respectively. The more quickly the symptoms develop,
the more quickly they resolve. However, recurrent
episodes appear in a fifth to a quarter of patients within
4
1 year after the first attack.
In acute cases of conversion deafness without a
previous history of conversion disorder, it is important
for the patient to have support and reassurance from
doctors, audiologists, and family members. Detection
of psychogenesis and etiologic factors are of utmost
importance for successful therapy. Psychiatric consultation may be helpful, and one must avoid confrontation or pejorative statements such as “there is
nothing wrong with your hearing”. If the symptoms
do not subside within a few weeks, psychotherapy
should be considered. Treating chronic conversion
J Chin Med Assoc • June 2006 • Vol 69 • No 6
cases is more challenging. Pharmacotherapy, such as
anxiolytics and antidepressants, may be helpful.
Psychotherapy may, likewise, be useful in chronic
cases, but may be contraindicated in patients with a
deterioration of symptoms when it is initiated.
References
1. Wolf M, Birger M, Ben-Shoshan J, Kronenberg J. Conversion
deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:349–52.
2. Pracy JP, Walsh RM, Mepham GA, Bowdler DA. Childhood
pseudohypacusis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1996;37:
143–9.
3. Austen S, Lynch C. Non-organic hearing loss redefined:
understanding, categorizing and managing non-organic
behavior. Int J Audiol 2004;43:449–57.
4. Hollifield MA. Somatoform disorders. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock
VA, eds. Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of
Psychiatry. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
2005:1800–18.
5. Radkowski D, Cleveland S, Friedman EM. Childhood
pseudohypacusis in patients with high risk for actual hearing
loss. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1534–8.
6. Monsell EM, Herzon FS. Functional hearing loss presenting
as sudden hearing loss: case report. Am J Otol 1984;5:407–10.
293