Download Resolution

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Zero tolerance wikipedia , lookup

California Proposition 36, 2012 wikipedia , lookup

Criminalization wikipedia , lookup

The New Jim Crow wikipedia , lookup

Harm reduction wikipedia , lookup

Public-order crime wikipedia , lookup

Life imprisonment in England and Wales wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Resolution Regarding Canada’s Proposed Mandatory Minimum
Sentences
Passed by the Board of Directors of the
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Toronto, Ontario
August 14, 2010
WHEREAS Bill S-10, the Penalties for Organized Drug Crime Act, which was introduced in Canada’s
Senate on May 5, 2010, seeks to amend existing Canadian law to provide for mandatory minimum
sentences for drug offenses;
WHEREAS NACDL’s broad international membership includes 75 Canadian lawyers and six Canadian
affiliate organizations.
WHEREAS NACDL and its affiliate members have long opposed mandatory minimum sentences, which
deprive judges of the ability to fashion sentences that suit the particular offense and offender;
WHEREAS mandatory minimum sentences in the United States have (1) produced unduly harsh and
disproportionate sentences that disregard the individual‘s circumstances, level of involvement and
culpability; (2) transferred discretion from judges to prosecutors, resulting in diminished transparency and
unchecked disparities; (3) inhibited defendants from exercising their Sixth Amendment right to a trial; and
(4) greatly exacerbated racial disparities in the criminal justice system;
WHEREAS unnecessarily severe sentences waste public resources and disrupt families, creating societal
costs that threaten the futures of innocent children and vulnerable communities;
WHEREAS jurisdictions which formerly adopted mandatory minimum sentences, including Michigan and
New York, have recognized both the ineffectiveness and costliness of mandatory minimums, and have
since repealed or limited the applicability of such sentences;
WHEREAS evidence, including Justice Canada’s review, indicates that mandatory minimum sentences
do not reduce drug addiction or the problems associated with drug use, thus having scant impact on the
reduction of drug use and crime;
WHEREAS the proposed Bill S-10 offers little help to serious drug addicts, instead proposing seriously
flawed drug treatment programs that stress abstinence and disregard the practically inevitable relapse of
a recovering addict;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers urges the
Government of Canada to abandon Bill S-10 and to reject mandatory minimum sentences; and
THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers
urges the Government of Canada to reallocate the money intended for S-10 to fund drug treatment and
harm reduction programs, alternatives to incarceration, employment opportunities, and human services.
APPROVED this 14th day of August, 2010
Toronto, Ontario