Download Dirichlet`s Approximation Theorem Let α be a positive real number

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Brouwer–Hilbert controversy wikipedia , lookup

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup

Non-standard analysis wikipedia , lookup

Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem wikipedia , lookup

Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Central limit theorem wikipedia , lookup

List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Non-standard calculus wikipedia , lookup

Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Four color theorem wikipedia , lookup

Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Dirichlet’s Approximation Theorem
Let α be a positive real number and n a positive integer. Then Dirichlet’s approximation theorem says:
There is an integer k and an integer b with 0 < k < n, for which
1
1
− < kα − b < .
(DAP)
n
n
Proof. Each of the n + 1 numbers ai = iα − biαc, i = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n, lies in the interval
0≤ ai < 1. So by the
Pigeonhole Principle there is at least one (semiclosed) subinterval of the form nr , r+1
n , 0 ≤ r < n, which
contains two of them, say am and aj . For such an m and j either (i) 0 ≤ am − aj < n1 or (ii) 0 ≤ aj − am < n1
and in either situation
1
1
− < am − aj < ;
n
n
1
1
− < mα − bmαc − (jα − bjαc) < ;
n
n
1
1
− < (m − j)α − (bmαc − bjαc) < ;
n
n
setting B = bmαc − bjαc yields both
1
1
1
1
− < (m − j)α − B <
and
− < (j − m)α + B < .
n
n
n
n
To complete the proof, if m > j put k = m − j and b = B, if m < j put k = j − m and b = −B.
Now since 0 < k < n; so
1
kn
<
1
k2 ,
one consequence of (DAP) is that
b
1
1
1
1
(1)
− 2 <−
<α− <
< 2.
k
nk
k
nk
k
Definition 1. A “D-approximation” to α is a rational number pq , whose denominator is a positive
integer q, with
p 1
(DAP1)
α − q < q 2 .
Dirichlet’s Approximation Theorem shows that each positive real number has a D-approximation,
namely the number kb referenced in (1).
Exercise 1. If two D-approximations both have denominator q > 1, then they are identical.
Exercise 2. There are at most two D-approximations with the same denominator.
Theorem 1. If α is irrational it has infinitely many D-approximations.
Proof. Suppose there is only a finite number of rational numbers pq satisfying (DAP1). Since |qα − p| is
always strictly greater than zero if α is not rational, we can choose the integer n so large that
1
p
(#)
< |qα − p|
for each of these ’s.
n
q
Given any n satisfying (#), Dirichlet’s Approximation Theorem states that there is a positive integer k <
n and an integer b such that |kα − b| < n1 . But then α − kb < k12 ; so kb is a D-approximation to α
and yet
b
k
6=
p
q
for any of the supposedly exhaustive collection of pq ’s satisfying (DAP1). The contradiction
shows there must be infinitely many
p
q
which satisfy (DAP1).
Exercise 3. Verify or prove the relation in the first boxed statement in the preceding proof.
Exercise 4. Verify or prove the relation in the second boxed statement in the preceding proof.
Theorem 2. If α is rational it has only a finite number of D-approximations.
Proof. Suppose
p
q
is a D-approximation to the rational number ab . Then if ab 6= pq ,
1
|aq − bp| a p 1
= − < 2 implies q < b,
<
bq
bq
b
q
q
so there are at most b available denominators for D-approximations. It follows from exercises 1 and 2 above
that the number of D-approximations to ab is finite.