Download how to bring two neptune mass planets on the same orbit

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Exploration of Jupiter wikipedia , lookup

Planet Nine wikipedia , lookup

Dwarf planet wikipedia , lookup

Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup

Kuiper belt wikipedia , lookup

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

Uranus wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Scattered disc wikipedia , lookup

Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup

Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup

Naming of moons wikipedia , lookup

Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
SF2A 2009
M. Heydari-Malayeri, C. Reylé and R. Samadi (eds)
HOW TO BRING TWO NEPTUNE MASS PLANETS ON THE SAME ORBIT
Crida, A.
1, 2
Abstract. We perform numerical simulations of Uranus and Neptune migrating in a dense protoplanetary
disk, in the presence of a non migrating Saturn. Due to the high density of the gaseous disk, the two 15 Earth
mass planets are caught in the same resonance by Saturn. Different kinds of configuration are observed :
planets in opposition, at 30 degree from each other, or satellite of each other. This would lead to horseshoe,
tadpole, or satellite orbits after dissipation of the gas disk. This appears to be a new way of making double
planets or pairs of planets on the same orbit (Crida, 2009).
1
Introduction
Planets form in protoplanetary gaseous disks, in which they also migrate. If several planets migrate together in
a same disk, the ratio of their semi-major-axes (and of their orbital periods) varies. It is then possible that they
enter in a Mean Motion Resonance (MMR). If the disk torques are stronger than the MMR, the planets cross
the MMR and go on migrating at different speeds. If the MMR is stronger than the torques from the disk, the
planets stay locked in resonance and migrate together.
In this work, we consider the migration of the giant planets of the Solar system in a disk about ten times
denser as the standard Minimum Mass Solar Nebula. In this case, resonances between two Neptune mass planet
are not strong enough to hold them away from each other against migration, which leads Uranus and Neptune
to end on the same orbit.
2
Results
We present the results of three simulations performed using the code FARGO-2D1D (code publicly available
at http://fargo.in2p3.fr/). The initial density profile of the disk is : Σ0 = 3430(r/10AU)−2.168 kg.m−2 .
Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus start on circular orbits at 5.45, 8.18, 11.5 and 14.2 AU respectively, and
are released after 1250 years. Jupiter’s fast inwards migration stops when Jupiter encounters the inner edge of
the 2D grid. Then, Jupiter catches Saturn in MMR, which stops Saturn’s migration. Then, Neptune is caught
in MMR by Saturn. Because the disk is too massive for Neptune to hold Uranus, Uranus ends in the same
MMR with Saturn as Neptune, as can be seen in Figs. 1 and 2.
Opposition In the first case, the equation of state of the gas is radiative, and the grid resolution is δr/r =
δθ = 0.01. After 12000 years, Uranus and Neptune have close encounters, and after 15000 years, the distance
between them stays equal to two times their common semi-major-axis (see red crosses in the left panel of
Fig. 1) : they are in opposition. One can expect that once the disk disappears, the two planets should have
mutual horseshoe orbits.
30◦ angle In the second case, the equation of state is locally isothermal, and the resolution is 10−2.5 . After
Uranus and Neptune end on the same orbit, the angle between them as seen from the Sun stays constant to
∼ 30◦ . This is not a stable configuration in the 3-bodies problem (Sun, Uranus, Neptune). Once the disk
disappears, these two planets should librate around their mutual L4 L5 points, in tadpole orbits.
1
CpT-TAT, Universität Tübingen – where this work was done, until december 2008.
D.A.M.T.P., University of Cambridge – since january 2009.
contact: [email protected]
c Société Francaise d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique (SF2A) 2009
2
236
SF2A 2009
14
Uranus
Uranus
Neptune
12
semi major axis [AU]
Astronomical Units
12
10
Saturn
8
Jupiter
6
10
30
8
Saturn
6
20
Jupiter
4
4
2
2
0
40
Neptune
Uranus-Neptune angle [deg]
50
14
0
0
2000
4000
6000
8000 10000
time [years]
12000
14000
16000
0
1000
2000
3000 4000 5000
time [years]
6000
7000
8000
Fig. 1. Migration paths of Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus (from bottom to top) in a dense disk. Left: radiative
equation of state and grid resolution 0.01. Right: locally isothermal equation of state, δr/r = δθ = 10−2.5 .
Satellite motion In the last case, the equation of state is still locally isothermal and the grid resolution is
0.01. When Neptune joins Uranus, their distance shrinks below the Hill radius of the latter (see crosses in
right panel of Fig. 2), betraying a satellite motion. This capture is enabled by the high density of the gas that
provides dissipation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a satellite capture is observed in numerical
simulations between two bodies of the mass of Neptune in the frame of planetary migration. This satellite
configuration is stable over the disk dissipation.
30
a Uranus
14
Uranus
10
a Neptune
Neptune
10
8
Astronomical Units
semi major axis [AU]
12
Saturn
6
Jupiter
1
rH (Neptune)
0.1
4
dist U-N
2
0
0.01
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
time [years]
6000
7000
8000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
time [years]
6000
7000
8000
Fig. 2. Right : Migration paths of Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus (from bottom to top). Left : Uranus and
Neptune semi-major-axes (top curves), distance (crosses), and Hill radius (bottom curve).
3
Conclusion
Migration in dense disks can be a way of forming pairs of Neptune-mass planets on the same orbits. If for some
reason their migration is halted at some point in the disk (like a resonance with an other, more massive planet),
they will both end on the same orbit. This can lead to configurations like tadpole orbits, mutual horseshoe
orbits, or double planets, one being satellite of the other. More detail on this work can be found in section 5.2
of Crida (2009).
References
Crida, A. 2009, ApJ, 698, 606