* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Week 1 DQ 1 Research Ethics Review the following studies from the
Survey
Document related concepts
Psychometrics wikipedia , lookup
Confirmation bias wikipedia , lookup
Cyberpsychology wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Operant conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Psychological injury wikipedia , lookup
Psychological evaluation wikipedia , lookup
Observational methods in psychology wikipedia , lookup
Vladimir J. Konečni wikipedia , lookup
Experimental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Week 1 DQ 1 Research Ethics Review the following studies from the reading/multimedia this week: a. Milgram’s study of obedience b. Thinking critically about Harlow's experiments c. “Little Albert” d. Guidelines for ethical care in the care and use of nonhuman animals in research e. Standard 8: Research and publication Choose one of the above studies and incorporate the following in your response: a. Summarize the study. b. Explain how classical and/or operant conditioning is applied in the study. c. Discuss the ethical issues associated with the methods of research. What were the risks to the subject(s)? What information was gained as a result of the research? Was the information gained from the study worth the risks? d. Identify which ethical principles should be applied when conducting research with human or animal subjects. Your initial post should be a minimum of 250-300 words. You must use at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed source that was published within the past five years and is cited according to APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Guided Response: Review several of your classmates’ posts. Respond substantively to at least two of your classmates who chose different studies than you. Do you agree or disagree with the ethical principles they addressed in their posts. Why or why not? What, if any, additional ethical principles should they consider? John B. Watson conducted the Little Albert experiment to demonstrate that emotional reactions such as fear could be classically conditioned in human beings, concentrating on their behavioral patterns (Lieberman, D.A., 2012, Chapter 2.3). Watson introduced a nine-month-old child named Albert to a white rat, in which the infant initially displayed no fear and actually exhibited fondness toward the animal. After the initial test, Watson introduced a loud noise while Albert was being exposed to the rat. The baby elicited fear and would burst into tears every time the rat was presented to him, validating Watson’s theory that fear could indeed be conditioned. The experiment, which continued for a long time, produced long lasting effects on Little Albert’s behavior; he developed phobia on rats and the fear response even extended to other similar furry objects such as rabbits. I believe that this experiment is harmful and unethical, and our present ethical guidelines will not allow any experiment of this kind to be carried out. Moral standards dictate that psychologists must never cause human participants to suffer any physical or emotional distress and must maintain the dignity and value of all people (American Psychological Association, 2010). Little Albert’s rights as a human being, especially as a child, were grossly breached to satisfy the objectives of the researchers. All in all, experiments such as the Little Albert experiment will not be permitted in our time, more so when researchers try to condition emotional response such as fear in the behavior of vulnerable people groups such as children. S. Milgram tried to measure people’s obedience to authority by devising an experiment wherein a participant was asked to administer electric shocks in increasing voltage levels to a subject. The participant administering the shocks wrongly believed that the subject was receiving actual shocks, and he/she must follow the instructions of the experimenter (point of authority) until the participant signifies the desire to stop the experiment. Milgram tries to validate the theory of operant conditioning by creating a scenario wherein people exhibit less than desirable actions because they were forced to do so. In the experiment, the administrators begin to show increasing signs of distress as the voltage level increases, and some begin to question the purpose of the test and ask whether they could stop even if they are required to continue. They would also apologize to the subjects even though the subjects were not actually hooked into the shock generator. There are reasons why researchers cross the fine line of ethical research. Some believe that certain details have to be kept hidden to the participants in order to produce valid results that are not subject to participants’ manipulation and adaptation. However, today’s ethical guidelines strongly put the welfare of human subjects as a primary consideration when conducting researches on people. Milgram’s study failed to recognize the effects of the test on the participants who experienced unnecessary anxiety and guilt over an action that they did not actually commit. No pain was done to the subjects, but the thought of inflicting pain caused much harm to the participants’ psychological being. Due to possible negative effects that might be inflicted on human and animal subjects in the course of an experiment, the American Psychological Association has outlined guidelines that would consider the physical and emotional health of all that are included in the experiment and would guarantee that the research has a sound purpose. Lieberman, D.A. (2012). Psychology of learning. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education. American Psychological Association. (2012). Guidelines for ethical care in the care and use of nonhuman animals in research. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/care/guidelines.asp American Psychological Association. (2010). Standard 8: Research and publication. In Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: 2010 amendments. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx# Lieberman, D. A. (2012) Psychology of Learning. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/4