Download Reef Water CO2 System and Carbon Production of Coral

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ocean acidification wikipedia , lookup

Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup

Marine biology wikipedia , lookup

Blue carbon wikipedia , lookup

Lagoon wikipedia , lookup

Diving in the Maldives wikipedia , lookup

Coral reef wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Global Environmental Change in the Ocean and on Land, Eds., M. Shiyomi et al., pp. 229–248.
© by TERRAPUB, 2004.
Reef Water CO2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs:
Topographic Control of System-Level Performance
Atsushi SUZUKI1 and Hodaka K AWAHATA1,2
1
Institute for Marine Resources and Environment, National Institute of Advanced
Industrial Science and Technology, Higashi 1-1, Tsukuba 305-8567, Japan
2
Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 908-8578, Japan
Abstract. The variations of seawater CO 2 system and organic and inorganic
carbon production of coral reefs were investigated with respect to topographic
types and oceanographic settings. Because of dominant carbonate production
in coral reef ecosystems, most coral reefs are likely to act as a net or at least a
potential CO2 source to the atmosphere. The comparison of the seawater CO2
system parameters (pH, total alkalinity, dissolved inorganic carbon and partial
pressure of CO2; pCO2) between a reef lagoon and the surrounding ocean
allowed us to evaluate the system-level performance of the carbon cycle in the
particular reef system. Surface pCO2 in the lagoons of some atolls and barrier
reefs in the western Pacific were consistently higher than those of their offshore
waters. The alkalinity decrease in the lagoon water was attributed to calcification
of reef organisms. Reef topography, especially residence time of lagoon water,
affects the carbon budget of coral reefs to some extent. The offshore-lagoon
differences in pCO2 from several reefs showed a tendency to increase with the
longer residence time of reef water. Another important factor controlling
carbon turnover in coral reefs is proximity to land: terrestrial carbon and
nutrient inputs were clearly observed in the northern Great Barrier Reef lagoon
as well as a fringing reef of the Ryukyus. These coastal reefs serve as an active
CO2-releasing area due not only to calcification but also to degradation of landderived carbon.
Keywords: coral reefs, carbon dioxide, carbon cycle, photosynthesis,
calcification, metabolism, lagoon
1. INTRODUCTION
Coral reefs are recognized as major geological features of the earth’s surface,
although they occupy only about 0.2% of the world’s ocean area (Smith, 1978).
There are two important biogeochemical processes in a coral reef system:
photosynthesis and calcification:
photosynthesis: CO2 + H2O → CH2O + O2
(1)
calcification: Ca2+ + 2HCO3 → CaCO3 + H2O + CO2.
(2)
229
230
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Table 1. Calcium carbonate flux estimates for different oceanic regions (after Iglesias-Rodriquez
et al., 2002, with partial modification). Production was calculated from flux multiplied by area. Unit
for flux was converted from gC m –2y–1 in the original table to mmol m–2d–1.
Neritic
Coral reefs
Carbonate shelves
Halimeda bioherms
Bank/Bays
Non-carbonate shelves
Total
Slope
Pelagic
Area
(101 2 m2 )
Flux
(mmol m– 2 d– 1 )
Production
(PgC y– 1 )
Accumulation
(PgC y– 1 )
0.6
10
?
0.8
15
41.1
0.5–2.7
82
14
0.7
32
283–300
0.4
0.3–0.6
0.108
0.024–0.120
0.02
0.048
0.05
0.25–0.34
0.060
0.41–1.1
0.084
0.036
0.02
0.024
0.012
0.17
0.048
0.1–0.144
The rapid calcification, which leads to reef growth and sediment formation, can
be attributed to a strong linkage to photosynthesis (Barnes and Chalker, 1990).
In recent decades, the role of coral reefs in the global biogeochemical cycle
has attracted much attention (Smith, 1978, 1981; Crossland et al., 1991; Gattuso
and Buddemeier, 2000). According to the latest estimate of the global CaCO3
budget, coral reefs contribute 32–43% of neritic CaCO3 production and 7–15%
of global CaCO3 production (Table 1). The global contribution of coral reefs
becomes larger if we look at CaCO3 accumulation, because of the stability of reef
carbonates in the shallow marine environment. Sedimentary carbonates represent
the largest reservoir of carbon on the earth and the fluctuation in global CaCO3
budget influences atmospheric CO2 concentration. Carbonate shells of marine
calficifiers are expected to play a role of “primary neutralizers” of anthropogenic
CO2.
In the early 1990s, there appeared to be some confusion in our understanding
of the function of marine calcifying organisms, particularly in coral reef science
communities (e.g. Kinsey and Hopley, 1991). Dissolution of carbonate (the
reverse of the reaction in Eq. (2)), not precipitation, enhances the ocean’s
capacity to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere. Ware et al. (1992) clearly stated that
coral reefs generally work as sources of atmospheric CO 2, based on the “0.6 rule”.
Frankignoulle et al. (1994) reinforced the “0.6 rule” with examinations using a
seawater CO2 system model and proposed a new index, Ψ (the released CO2/
precipitated carbonate ratio).
Despite the comments of Ware et al. (1992), Kayanne et al. (1995) reported
the diurnal change of pCO2 in Shiraho reef water of Ishighaki Island, the
Ryukyus, together with an estimate of high net community production (110
mmol–1d–1) which can mask the CO 2 released from carbonate production (110
mmol–1d–1), and suggested the reef acts as a CO2 sink. While their result was
criticized for the great uncertainty in their estimation of the reef-offshore
difference of partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), based on the light—pCO2 relationship
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
231
obtained from relatively short-term observation (Gattuso et al., 1996a), their
findings stimulated the subsequent debate on the sink/source problem of coral
reefs (Kayanne, 1996). Suzuki et al. (1995) reported a relatively high P/R ratio
for a reef-flat community, on Shiraho reef again, supporting the conclusion of
Kayanne et al. (1995). Kraines et al. (1996, 1997) also reported sink-type
behavior of a coral reef in Bora Bay, Miyako Island, which is adjacent to Ishigaki
Island. In contrast to these results from the Ryukyu Islands of Japan, studies in
Moorea, French Polynesia, and Yonge Reef of the northern Great Barrier Reef
(GBR), showed that reef-flat communities are net sources of atmospheric CO2
(Gattuso et al., 1993, 1995; Frankignoulle et al., 1996; Gattuso et al., 1996b).
More recently, observations from mid-oceanic reefs (Majuro Atoll, Palau barrier
reef and South Male Atoll), as well as the GBR, showed high pCO2 in reef lagoons
compared to that in the offshore area, confirming our current understanding that
most coral reefs operate as sources of atmospheric CO2 (Kawahata et al., 1997,
2000b; Suzuki et al., 1997; Suzuki and Kawahata, 1999). While measurements of
community metabolism are considered significant in the coral reef CO2 sourcesink debate (Gattuso et al., 1999), the problem has been recently examined from
some different points of view, including a long-term geochemical perspective
and the prediction of future response to global warming (Kleypas et al., 1999,
2001).
Our knowledge of the carbon budget and cycling in coral reefs is still limited
and there remain many problems other than the CO2 sink/source issue. As the
number of observations increases, differences in the mode of carbon cycling
among coral reefs have become evident. The variations may be related to
topographic types and oceanographic settings of individual reefs as well as the
influence of human disturbance (Suzuki and Kawahata, 1999, 2003).
Here we re-examine published results on reef metabolisms obtained from
coral reefs in the Indo-Pacific regions, including our own studies, in order to
survey the latest progress on the CO2 sink/source issue and evaluate how and how
much the topography and oceanographic settings influence the carbon turnover
of coral reefs. Special attention is paid to terrestrial influences on coastal reefs.
2. DATA SETS
2.1 Observations on marine CO 2 system of coral reef waters
Coral reefs, which we re-examine in this study, include Shiraho Reef of the
Ryukyu Islands (Suzuki et al., 1995), Palau barrier reef (Kawahata et al., 1997),
Majuro Atoll (Suzuki et al., 1997), South Male Atoll (Suzuki and Kawahata,
1999), as well as the GBR (Kawahata et al., 2000b; Suzuki et al., 2001) (Fig. 1).
In order to evaluate the CO2 system in reef water and to estimate organic and
carbonate carbon productions, temperature, salinity, pH, total alkalinity (AT) and
dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) were measured in discrete water samples.
Details of measurements and calculations of pCO2 based on chemical equilibrium
of CO 2 system are described in the original papers mentioned above. In Palau
reef, Majuro Atoll and the GBR, direct measurements of pCO2 were conducted
1.1
∼3
0.35


19
∼40
∼40
5
6.2
3
39
68
∼3






125
110
180
329


(m)
(km)
15 × 15
11 × 11
15 × 20
39 × 10
32 × 18
1.7 × 1
Mean depth
Area
(km 2)
Scale
Barrier reef
Tiahura Barrier R.
∼1 km wide
Yonge Reef
∼2 km wide
Palau Barrier Reef
13 km wide
Northern GBR
∼80 km wide
Southern GBR
>100 km wide
Fringing reef (Ryukyu Islands, Japan)
Shiraho Reef
∼1 km wide
Shiraho Reef
Bora Bay*
1 × 0.6
Atoll
Fanning Atoll*
Canton Atoll*
Christmas Is.*
Majuro Atoll*
South Male Atoll
Rukan-sho*
Reef
4h
4−8 h
2−4 h
6h


32 d
50 d
10−15 d
15 d


Residence time
110
36
164
75
33



−0.4
3
6
8

72
Org-C
100
127
132
186
253



27
14
2.5
27

108
CaCO3
Net C production
1.3
1.1
1.4
1.2
1.1



1

>1


1.5
P/R
1.1
0.3
1.2
0.4
0.1



−0.01
0.01
2.4
0.29

0.67
R OI
157−521




414
339
326
400
290−400
220
368
368

Inside
322




366
311
314
370
330
310
345
362

Outside
pCO2 (µatm)
−7

<0


+46
+29
+12
+30
+15
−80
+23
+6

(µatm)
δCO2
sink

sink
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
sink
source
source
neutral
Flux
Table 2. Summary of topographic features, carbon metabolisms and air-sea CO 2 flux for coral reefs
in the Indo-Pacific region. After Suzuki and Kawahata (2003). Net community carbon production
(“Net C Production” in the table) is expressed in units of mmol m–2day –1 both for organic carbon
(Org-C) and inorganic carbon (CaCO 3) productions. Symbols P/R and ROI represent the ratio of gross
community production to respiration and the ratio of net organic production to net inorganic carbon
production, respectively. Symbol δ pCO 2 represent the difference in seawater pCO 2 between lagoon
water and the offshore water and definition is given by Eq. (3) in the text. Influence on δ pCO 2 values
caused by the offshore-lagoon difference in temperature and salinity were negligible for most cases.
Asterisk (*) denotes that the production rates were estimated at system level including active reef
flat community in a lagoon. Production estimates for Bora Bay was area-weighed average based on
the values for reef flat and lagoon communities.
Kayanne et al. (1995)
Hata et al. (2002)
Kraines et al. (1997)
Gattuso et al. (1993)
Gattuso et al. (1996b)
Kawahata et al. (1997)
Suzuki et al. (2001)
Suzuki et al. (2001)
Smith and Pesret (1974)
Smith and Jokiel (1978)
Smith et al. (1984)
Suzuki et al. (1997)
Suzuki and Kawahata (1999)
Ohde and van Woesik (1999)
Reference of pCO2 values
232
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
233
Fig. 1. Locality of coral reefs examined in this study. Although Rucan reef is classified as an atoll
here, more appropriately it can be categorized as a platform reef (Ohde and van Woesik, 1999).
using a shipboard nondispersive infrared (NDIR) gas analyzer system with a
shower-type air-sea equilibrator onboard R/V Hakurai-Maru (Kawahata et al.,
1997; Kawahata et al., 2000b; Suzuki et al., 2001).
Other than the results described above, information on reef metabolism at the
community and/or system level and pCO2 values from some coral reefs in the
Indo-Pacific regions was cited from published reports (Table 2). Additional
geomorphological data on each coral reef are also shown in Table 2. Coral reefs
in the table can be divided into three categories with respect to reef morphology:
(1) atolls, (2) barrier reefs, and (3) fringing reefs (Fig. 2).
2.2 Topographic characteristics of coral reefs examined
2.2.1 Atolls
Majuro Atoll (7°N, 171°E; Fig. 3A) in the Marshall Islands, central Pacific,
has a semi-enclosed lagoon with a maximum depth of 67 m. The lagoon has only
one deep passage with a maximum depth of 46 m. The topography effectively
isolates the wide interior lagoon from the outside ocean. South Male Atoll (4°00′
N, 73°25′ E; Fig. 3B) of the Maldive Islands, northern Indian Ocean, is an ovalshaped atoll. The lagoon water is connected with the offshore water through many
deep channels between shallow reef flats.
Fanning Atoll (Smith and Pesret, 1974) and Canton Atoll (Smith and Jokiel,
1978) are also oceanic atolls in the central Pacific. The coral reef of Christmas
Island, central Pacific, has a land-locked shallow lagoon (2–4 m deep) and Smith
et al. (1984) conducted the survey of this lagoon. Rukan-sho (Rukan reef) is a
small-scale atoll off Okinawa Island of the Ryukyus (Ohde and van Woesik,
1999).
2.2.2 Barrier reefs
In the Palau (Belau) Archipelago of the Caroline Islands (7°N, 134°E; Fig.
3C), a wide lagoon (Southern Lagoon; Maragos and Cook, 1995) with a maximum
depth of 55 m exists between the islands and a barrier reef platform (hereafter
Palau barrier reef lagoon). A narrow channel at the northern end of the lagoon is
234
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
(A)
Moat
Channel
Lagoon
Motu
Fore-reef
slope
Fringing Reef
Barrier Reef
(B) Fringing Reef
Reef flat
Moat
Reef crest
Atoll
(C) Barrier Reef and Atoll
Motu Reef flat
Lagoon
Reef crest
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of morphological types of coral reefs including fringing reefs, barrier
reefs and atolls (A). Topographic zonation of fringing reefs (B) and barrier reefs and atolls (C) are
shown in the lower panels. A shallow depression of a fringing reef is usually referred as a moat
(shallow lagoon), of depth shallower than 2–3 m.
the only deep passage (maximum depth 65 m) along the reef platform extending
for approximately 86 km.
The GBR extends approximately 2600 km along the eastern coast of Australia,
covering a wide range in latitude (15 degrees; Fig. 1). The major portion of total
shelf area lies between 30 m and 40 m isobaths. Despite the name of “barrier”, the
outer reefs are not continuous and the continuity of outer reefs is defined as
“linear density” of reefs along the shelf break (Pickard et al., 1977). There is a
striking contrast between the northern and southern GBR. The northern GBR (9–
16°S) is a continuous stretch with the linear density reaching 90%, while the
southern GBR (>16°S) exhibits apparently low values around 10%. In the
northern GBR region, the wet-tropical catchments supply a large proportion of
total runoff to the GBR throughout the year (Mitchell and Furnas, 1996). On the
other hand, two large dry-catchment rivers (Fitzroy and Burdekin Rivers) show
clear seasonality in discharge volumes. During the research cruise conducted in
the dry season of 1996, freshwater input was recognized as a salinity decrease in
the inshore area of the northern GBR lagoon, while no influence of freshwater
input was detected in the southern GBR region (Suzuki et al., 2001). In this study
we examine the data from the northern and southern parts of the GBR separately.
2.2.3 Fringing reef
Shiraho Reef, located on the east coast of Ishigaki Island, southern Ryukyu
Islands, Japan, is a well-developed fringing-type reef without a deep lagoon. The
reef flat is about 800 m in width and is composed of four topographic sub-units
including outer reef slope, reef crest, inner reef flat, and moat (Nakamori et al.,
1992). The moat is a trough-like depression (shallow lagoon) along the coast with
a depth that never exceeds 3 m (Fig. 2). Suzuki et al. (1995) measured community
metabolism on the inner reef flat while Kayanne et al. (1995) reported diurnal
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
235
Fig. 3. Spatial distributions of pCO2 in surface waters around oceanic atolls and barrier reefs.
Average value of the offshore-lagoon difference in pCO2 (δ pCO 2) at in-situ temperature and salinity
observed in each reef is shown in each panel. Majuro Atoll (A) and South Male Atoll (B) represent
oceanic atolls while barrier reefs include Palau barrier reef (C) and the northern and southern GBR
(D and E). Three mid-oceanic atolls and barrier reefs (A, B and C) have lagoons of similar size, but
which are different in the degree of closure to the surrounding sea.
pCO2 variations at a deeper station near the boundary between the moat and the
inner reef flat. More recently, Hata et al. (2002) conducted a comprehensive study
of carbon fluxes at Shiraho Reef in Ishigaki Island in September 1998.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 A definition of the coral reef sink-source problem
We need to start by clarifying the definition of the problem. Our concern for
the CO2 performance of coral reefs has several components. The mode change of
coral reef metabolisms due to anthropogenic CO2 increase in the atmosphere will
be answered by the comparison of reef performance between pre- and post-
236
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
industrial revolution periods. The future response of carbon and carbonate
production in coral reefs to global warming and the following sea-level rise has
attracted much attention (Kinsey and Hopley, 1991; Kleypas et al., 1999, 2001).
The role of coral reefs over a geological time scale has also been discussed
elsewhere (Kleypas, 1997; Gattuso et al., 1999). Although these topics are
certainly interesting, here we focus on the contribution of the coral reef ecosystem
to the global carbon cycle in a current/natural state within a relatively short time
scale. Some previously published reports employed a similar definition of the
problem to that adopted here (Kinsey and Hopley, 1991; Ware et al., 1992;
Gattuso et al., 1999).
Among studies focusing on the influence of coral reef performance on the
global carbon cycle in a present state within a relatively short time scale, two
different approaches have been employed. Ware et al. (1992), as well as Kinsey
and Hopley (1991), focused on carbonate production of coral reefs, ignoring
organic carbon production because net organic carbon production is generally
believed to be small and the P/R ratio at community level is almost 1 (Crossland
et al., 1991). On the other hand, Gattuso et al. (1999) stressed the significance of
community metabolism measurements in the coral reef CO2 source-sink debate.
We also consider the importance of organic carbon metabolisms, as well as
carbonate production, based on the following two viewpoints. First, the organic
carbon production process in reef systems is somewhat different from the
offshore processes, especially with respect to nutrient budgets. The high C:N:P
ratio of benthic plants in coral reefs (550:30:1; Atkinson and Smith, 1983)
relative to plankton (106:16:1; Redfield et al., 1963) allows reefs to produce more
organic matter per unit delivery of nutrients than can be produced by adjacent
plankton communities (Crossland et al., 1991). The high biomass/production
ratio of coral reefs compared to the offshore ecosystems is another important
characteristic of coral reef systems with respect to carbon storage (Smith, 1981).
Second, our knowledge of the fate of organic carbon produced in coral reefs is still
limited in terms both of the export to the surrounding ocean and sedimentary
burial in a lagoon bottom (see Hata et al., 1998, 2002), which may not allow us
to neglect the contribution of organic carbon production as trivial. According to
the viewpoints described above, we start the examination by taking organic
carbon production into account.
3.2 ROI: an index for sink/source behavior
The sink/source behavior of coral reefs is primarily controlled by the balance
between photosynthesis and calcification, which shift the chemical equilibrium
of oceanic CO 2 system in opposite directions (Eqs. (1) and (2)). Photosynthesis
decreases pCO 2 while calcium carbonate production raises pCO2. Suzuki (1998)
examined seawater pCO2 change caused by photosynthesis and calcification and
proposed the molar ratio of organic to inorganic production (ROI) as a criterion of
the CO2 sink/source behavior of marine metabolism. In this study, we apply the
index ROI to evaluate the sink/source performance of each coral reef in the data
sets.
Fig. 4. Metabolic effects on sink/source potential of seawater with respect to the atmospheric CO 2.
(A) Changes in pCO 2 (δ pCO 2) caused by the various rates of photosynthesis and calcification.
Calculations are conducted for salinity 35 and 25°C supposing initial condition of seawater is 2346
µ mol kg–1 in total alkalinity, 2000 µmol kg –1 in DIC, and 345 µatm in pCO 2. Shaded area indicates
the region where pCO 2 increased by metabolism. (B) Diurnal metabolism cycles and the criteria for
sink/source behavior. (C) Sediment composition as an index for sink/source behavior of overlying
water with respect to CO 2 exchange between the seawater and the atmosphere. Shaded area indicates
sediment compositions where pCO2 is expected to increase by sedimentary particle formation.
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
237
238
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Figure 4A displays changes in pCO2 (δpCO2) caused by various combinations
of net organic production (=photosynthesis – respiration) and net inorganic
production (=calcification – dissolution) in seawater with a salinity of 35 at 25°C.
This figure indicates that pCO2 decreases (δpCO2 < 0, therefore, sink-type
behavior) when net organic production is larger than approximately 0.6 times net
inorganic carbon production (ROI > 0.6). In the present study, the symbol ROI0
denotes the critical ratio for δ pCO2 = 0.
The critical value of approximately 0.6 for ROI0 is almost identical to the Ψ
value (molar ratios of released CO 2 to precipitated CaCO 2) proposed by
Frankignoulle et al. (1994). Therefore, ROI can be recognized as a different
expression of Ψ, suggesting that the degassing and absorption processes of CO2
in the air-sea interface are identical to photosynthetic CO2 uptake from seawater
and respiratory CO2 release of aquatic organisms, respectively, with respect to
the effects on the chemical equilibrium in seawater.
A similar analogy can be applied to the chemical compositions of reef
sediments, if the sediments store the products of past reef metabolism. According
to Buddemeier (1996), a reef that is an atmospheric CO2 sink has to deposit more
than 12 weight % organic matter (6 weight % organic carbon) in reef sediments.
This criterion can be extended to a three-component system shown in Fig. 4C.
3.3 Temporal and spatial scale of the problem
In order to apply the index ROI to coral reef metabolism, we need to examine
the scales of discussion in time and space. Usually we discuss the sink/source
behavior of coral reef organisms and/or communities on the daily or yearly basis.
The concept and terminology of daily metabolism are shown in Fig. 4B, which
indicates the importance of estimating net organic and inorganic production for
a certain period in order to determine the CO2 sink/source behavior of organisms
and/or communities.
The sink/source debate in the early 1990s mostly focused on the “coral reef
flat”. There are two methods for measuring metabolisms of reef communities:
flow respirometry and the slack-water method. Flow respirometry has been
employed on a reef flat community under unidirectional flow by many researchers,
including the pioneering work by Odum and Odum (1955). The slack-water
method was proposed by Kinsey (1978) and has been widely used in enclosed
conditions on reef flats or moats during low tide.
Gattuso et al. (1993, 1995) reported that the reef flat community of the
barrier reef of Moorea is a net source of atmospheric CO2, based on daily net
organic and inorganic production measurements using flow respirometry. By
contrast, Kayanne et al. (1995) and Suzuki et al. (1995) employed the slack-water
method to measure reef-flat metabolism in Shiraho Reef, concluding that the reef
flat community showed a sink-like behavior.
Contradictory results are, at least partly, a reflection of the large errors in
measuring the community metabolism rate of coral reefs. Difficulties in production
estimates are caused by the relatively short residence time of water in fringing and
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
239
(A) Shiraho fringing reef
D ay
Slack-w at er peri od
pH
8.50
Supposed offshore level
8.00
18
8.30
(B) Majuro Atoll
8.289
8.28
8.26
6
0
Sep. 21
Sep. 20
8.32
200
100
Depth
7.50 12
pH at 25 C
D ay
Night
12
0
Depth (cm)
pH at 25 C
9.00
Night Day
Offshore mean = 8.300
8.299
8.298
8.290
St. R
2
St . R1
Offshore
Lagoon
East
West
8.24
8.22
Sep. 10
Sep. 11
Sep. 12
Sep. 13
Sep. 14
Fig. 5. Temporal variations of pH in the surface seawater on Shiraho fringing reef (A) and Majuro
Atoll lagoon (B). Panel (A) represents the diurnal pH variation of reef water at a station located on
the inner reef flat (Suzuki et al., 1995). Hatched areas indicate the periods of slack water during low
tide. Abrupt changes of reef water pH were caused by the influx of the offshore water while pH
increase and decrease during the daytime and nighttime slack-water periods, respectively, were
driven by reef metabolisms. In the panel (B), all pH values at many stations were plotted against time
including repeated pH measurements at fixed stations R 1 and R 2 in the lagoon and the offshore,
respectively. The pH at St. R 1 in the lagoon was 8.289 on September 10 and 8.290 on September 12.
The difference between the pH values on September 12 and 13 at St. R2 offshore was again only
0.001. Repeat measurements indicate that day-to-day pH variations of the lagoon and offshore water
masses were small during the observation period.
barrier reefs. As an example, the diurnal pattern of pH in seawater on a fringing
reef is shown in Fig. 5A. Dual modulation on variations of pH and other CO2
parameters due to tide and light cycles makes the measurements of community
metabolism difficult. The daily budget estimate cannot escape a large uncertainty
caused by the integration of short-term metabolism rates.
On the other hand, deep lagoons of oceanic atolls and barrier reefs have a
relatively long residence time of several weeks to months (Table 2). Consequently,
the diurnal changes of pH in both the lagoon and the offshore waters are usually
small (Fig. 5B). In this case, a more reliable approach to examining the CO2 sink/
source behavior of coral reefs can be successfully applied to atolls and barrier
reefs (Kawahata et al., 1997; Suzuki et al., 1997). These studies compared the
pCO2 differences (δ pCO2) between the lagoon water (pCO2,L) and the offshore
waters (pCO2,O) of mid-oceanic reefs, such as Majuro Atoll and Palau barrier
reef:
240
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Fig. 6. The DIC and total alkalinity budgets for Majuro Atoll (modified from Suzuki et al., 1997).
Concentrations of AT and DIC are normalized at offshore salinity (S = 33.69) and represented by the
unit of µ mol L–1. Production and inputs are shown in mol day –1 corresponding to a residence time
of 15 days reported by Kraines et al. (1999). Net organic and inorganic carbon production was
estimated to be 8 mmol m –2d–1 and 27 mmol m–2d –1, respectively, supposing the total area of the inner
reef flat and the lagoon (329 km –2).
δpCO2 = pCO2,L – pCO2,O.
(3)
Since water and dissolved materials typically enter atolls across the reef flat from
the ocean, the composition of lagoon water reflects metabolic activity, not only
in the lagoon but also on the reef flats and knolls. This condition favors the
evaluation of the net effect of reef metabolisms on reef water-atmosphere CO2
exchange. Smith (1988) demonstrated the ability of a similar approach to
examine nutrient budgets of confined aquatic ecosystems. This strategy can also
be applied to marine CO2 systems to examine the sink/source behavior of coral
reefs at system level.
3.4 Sink/source behavior of coral reefs
In this section we test the suitability of the index ROI for evaluating the sink/
source performance using the data sets (Table 2). Can sink/source behavior of the
particular coral reef be predicted based on a system-level ROI value?
The first example is Majuro Atoll (Suzuki et al., 1997), the net organic and
inorganic carbon production of which was re-calculated as 8 mmol m–2d–1 and 27
mmol m –2d–1, respectively (Fig. 6), supposing a residence time of 15 days, as
reported by Kraines et al. (1999). Because the ROI value is 0.29, which is less than
the critical value of 0.6, it is predicted that the atoll shows positive δpCO2 (CO2
source). The average δpCO2 values observed in Majuro Atoll was around +48
µatm and the prediction agrees with the result of pCO2 observations (Fig. 3A).
Net organic and inorganic carbon production reported at community- and
system-levels, together with observed δpCO2 values, are plotted in Fig. 7. Other
than Majuro Atoll, Fanning Atoll and Canton Atoll in the category of atolls in
Table 2 showed considerably smaller ROI values than the critical ratio. High
δpCO2 was evident for those atolls, indicating consistency with ROI-based
prediction.
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
241
Legend
System-level
Reef flat community
OI
Tiahura (+)
R
Yonge (+)
200
Rukan
Shiraho2
Majuro (+23)
Fanning (+30)
Canton (+15)
Bora Bay (-)
Shiraho1 (-7)
100
0
Christmas (-80)
sink
-100
0
-100
100
200
300
Organic carbon production
(mmol m-2 d-1)
Inorganic carbon production
(mmol m-2 d-1)
300
=0
.6
source
Fig. 7. Community- and system-level estimates on net organic and inorganic carbon production
listed in Table 1. Values in parenthesis represent the offshore-lagoon difference in pCO2 (δ pCO 2;
µatm) at in-situ temperature and salinity. Reefs with only signs of minus and plus in parenthesis
represent the trend in observed δ pCO 2 although exact values are not available. A line, which
represents ROI = 0.6, is shown in the diagram. The line is a critical boundary for constant pCO2 for
normal surface seawater with salinity of 35 at 25°C (Suzuki, 1998). Labels Shiraho1 and Shiraho2
denote the results of Kayanne et al. (1995) and Hata et al. (2002), respectively. Note that estimates
on Shiraho Reef (reef flat community; Kayanne et al., 1995), Bora Bay reef (total system) and
Christmas Island (shallow lagoon community) are plotted in “sink” area of the diagram.
While most community- and system-level estimates are plotted in the
“source” region (ROI < 0.6), some exceptions are found. Christmas Island lagoon
indicated higher ROI values than the critical ratio and a negative δpCO2 value was
indeed observed (CO2 sink). The phosphorus input from guano deposits was
expected to stimulate active organic production in the lagoon, while low salinity
due to fresh water input may have partly contributed to the extremely low pCO2
in lagoon water (Smith et al., 1984). A metabolic study of Rukan reef reported 0.7
for ROI, which is close to the critical value (Ohde and van Woesik, 1999).
Therefore, the community metabolism is predicted to be almost neutral with
respect to air-sea CO2 flux. This prediction does not contradict the conclusion of
the original authors.
Two fringing reefs, Shiraho Reef (Kayanne et al., 1995) and Bora Bay
(Kraines et al., 1997) in the Ryukyu Islands, indicate higher ROI values than the
critical ratio (ROI > 0.6) and a negative δpCO2 value was indeed reported from
Shiraho Reef (CO2 sink) by the authors. The relationship between ROI and
observed δpCO2 of these reefs is consistent with the hypothesis, even when those
reefs showed a CO2-sink behavior. Is CO2-sink-like performance common for the
fringing type of reefs? We cannot exclude the possibility that some fringing reefs
have higher ROI values than the critical ratio due to large contribution from an
active reef flat community, where high ROI values can be expected. On the other
hand, the influence on reef metabolism of fertilizer used on farmland has been
242
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
pointed out as a possible cause of the relatively high organic production in the reef
flat community of Bora Bay as well as Shiraho Reef (Kraines et al., 1997).
More recently, Hata et al. (2002) conducted a comprehensive study of
carbon fluxes, including community metabolism and carbon export in the form of
dissolved and particulate matter at Shiraho Reef in September 1998. According
to their estimates, ROI can be calculated to take a relatively small value of 0.3 for
the reef flat community, suggesting a CO2-source-like behavior. Because Shiraho
Reef is the site where negative δpCO2 observation was reported previously
(Kayanne et al., 1995), the implication of the results for the CO2 sink/source
debate is important. The study, however, was done during the recovery stage from
the 1998 mass bleaching event in the region. Special caution may thus be needed
when discussing this event.
In conclusion, the observations of δ pCO2 listed in Table 2 agree well with the
theoretical prediction that ROI can be used as an index of sink/source behavior
(Fig. 7). Most community- and system-level estimates appeared to support a CO2source (ROI < 0.6). Although some coral reefs showed sink-like metabolisms (ROI
> 0.6), some regional effects, which enhance organic carbon production, have
been pointed out as a likely cause of their CO2-sink type behavior.
3.5 Topographic control on CO2 system in coral reefs
The observed δpCO2 values varied from reef to reef (Fig. 3). Although the
ratio ROI is a primary factor determining the sink-source behavior of a particular
reef system, there must be another factor controlling the magnitude of δpCO2
values. In addition, there appears to be a slightly increasing trend in δ pCO2 with
longer reef water residence time (Table 2). Open atolls and fringing reefs with
short water residence times tend to show small or even negative δ pCO2 values.
In other words, the slower the renewal of the water is, the higher is pCO2 in reef
water.
Difference of carbon turnover in coral reefs due to residence time variation
can be seen in AT-DIC diagrams for South Male Atoll and Palau Barrier Reef (Fig.
8). The graphic approach to carbon cycle study of coral reefs using an AT-DIC
diagram was illustrated by Suzuki and Kawahata (2003). Most of the lagoon
samples of both reefs are plotted around a “calcification line” in the AT-DIC
diagrams, suggesting predominant carbonate production in these reefs with
negligible excess organic carbon production. In detail, the distance between the
offshore and lagoon clusters in the diagram along the calcification line is much
larger for Palau barrier reef than South Male Atoll, reflecting the larger
compositional change of Palau lagoon water from the surrounding ocean.
The lagoon of South Male Atoll has an open nature, being connected to the
surrounding ocean by numerous deep channels (30–70 m deep), which are much
deeper than typical Pacific atoll channels. In contrast to scanty reef development
in typical Pacific atoll lagoons, the flourishing of branching corals on knolls in
the lagoon of Maldivian atolls (Kohn, 1964) is probably related to the large flow
of oceanic water through the broad, deep channels. Thus, the small changes in
CO2 system parameters including AT, DIC and pCO2 values between the offshore
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
Residence time
2200
2170
1820
Offshore
Near reef
Lagoon
ica
tion
2220
1870
Cal
cif
line
Degassing
Offshore
Lagoon
2150
Normalized at S = 34.5
Normalized at S = 35.0
1920
1970
2020
ica
tion
2270
(B) Palau barrier reef
Photosynthesis Respiration
Cal
2250
Stagnant
cifi
cati
on
2300
2320
Cal
cif
Normalized AT ( mol kg-1)
2370
(A) South Male Atoll
Ca
l
+Dcific
eg atio
as n
sin
g
Well flushed
243
2100
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
Normalized DIC ( mol kg-1)
Fig. 8. Total alkalinity-DIC plots for two oceanic reef lagoons including South Male Atoll (A) and
Palau barrier reef (B). Normalized values at constant salinities are plotted in order to remove the
influences from rainwater input and evaporation. Major metabolic and biogeochemical processes are
shown in each panel. Most dominant process in coral reefs is calcification and a calcification path
is represented on the A T-DIC diagram by a line of slope 2.
and the lagoon can be attributed to dilution due to the high flushing rate of the
lagoon. On the other hand, Palau barrier reef lagoon shows a higher degree of
closure than South Male Atoll, having only one deep entrance channel. As the
residence time increases, more time becomes available for calcification. The
observed decreases in AT and DIC in the lagoon compared to the offshore water
were greater in Palau lagoon than in South Male Atoll lagoon. This evidence is
consistent with the observed difference of δpCO2 between the two reefs.
3.6 Terrestrial influence on coastal coral reefs
While oceanic reefs, such as South Male and Majuro atolls, have no
terrestrial influence from land, the GBR and Shiraho Reef are closely located
along the coast. Alteration of the mode of carbon cycling can be expected in these
coastal reef systems. Indeed, we found significant differences between the ATDIC diagrams of the northern and southern GBR lagoons (Fig. 9), with a
remarkable difference between them in terms of water, sediment and nutrient
input from land.
In the AT-DIC diagram for the southern GBR lagoon (Fig. 9A), most of the
lagoon samples of both reefs are plotted around a “calcification line”, suggesting
predominant carbonate production with negligible excess organic carbon
production. By contrast, overall displacement of the lagoon-water calcification
line from the offshore compositions can be seen along the increasing DIC trend
(Fig. 9B). As described in Suzuki et al. (2001), this indicates the presence of net
external carbon inputs to the lagoon other than surface oceanic exchange.
Possible processes which increase DIC of the system are oxidation of organic
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Terrestrial influence
2280
2280
40
ica
tion
2260
Cal
cif
2260
Offshore
Lagoon
2240
normalized at S = 35
2220
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2240
2220
1880
ica
tion
2300
0
2300
30
0
25
0
2320
35
0
30
0
25
0
Normalized AT ( mol kg-1)
2320
Evident
(B) Northern GBR lagoon
40
0
(A) Southern GBR lagoon
Cal
cif
Little
35
0
244
Offshore
Lagoon
DIC input
Oxidation
normalized at S = 35
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
Normalized DIC ( mol kg-1)
Fig. 9. Normalized total alkalinity-DIC plots with corresponding pCO2 ( µatm) contours for the
southern and northern GBR lagoons (A and B, respectively). Overall displacement from the ideal
calcification line from the offshore composition towards DIC high in panel (B) can be attributed to
external carbon inputs to the northern GBR lagoon other than oceanic exchange.
matter and DIC supply from external sources such as atmospheric input, rainfall
and river discharge. Suzuki et al. (2001) concluded that the possible external
source of carbon into the GBR lagoon is terrestrial input, including direct
discharge of DIC in freshwater and oxidation of land-derived organic matter.
Calcification, together with DIC inputs from terrestrial sources, serves a major
role in the net carbon cycle of the northern GBR lagoon system. No features of
excess organic carbon production can be seen.
Do nutrient inputs from land stimulate organic carbon production in a reef
area? Suzuki et al. (2001) estimated the riverine C:N:P molar ratio in the GBR
region as 1120:30:1, based on their carbon budget calculation and annual riverine
nitrogen and phosphorous input estimated by Furnas et al. (1995). These ratios
are much higher than the Redfield ratio for plankton (106:16:1; Redfield et al.,
1963), and the ratio of benthic plants in coral reefs (550:30:1; Atkinson and
Smith, 1983). Therefore, even if all discharged nutrients are utilized by biological
processes of both planktonic organisms and benthic communities, surplus carbon
must remain in the reef water as oxidized DIC. Although nutrient inputs may
stimulate organic carbon production in a reef area, net oxidation of organic matter
rather than net organic carbon fixation would be expected in the GBR lagoon.
A similar influence was also recognized in the Shiraho fringing reef of the
Ryukyu Islands (Kawahata et al., 2000a). Land derived freshwaters, including
river water and groundwater, make a relatively large contribution to the reef’s
circulation system. These terrestrial waters exhibit extremely high pCO2, up to
6,400 µ atm, reflecting enrichments in AT and DIC due to dissolution of carbonate
rocks and decomposition of organic matter in the soil of subtropical island. These
terrestrial influences may enhance CO2 degassing from the coastal zone. While
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
245
sink-type behavior has been reported for reef flats of fringing reefs, the influence
of terrestrial inputs on carbon turnover of the entire fringing reef system remains
a subject for future discussion.
The future change of coral reef calcification is currently a subject of
discussion with respect to global warming and the accompanying changes of
carbonate saturation state in seawater (Kleypas et al., 1999, 2001). The recent
degradation of coastal reef ecosystems due to anthropogenic impacts is also very
severe. In addition, recurrent mass bleaching events, which can be at least partly
attributed to the global warming, may result in a decrease in organic production
and fishery yield in coral reefs (Hughes et al., 2003). A further understanding of
carbon dynamics in coral reefs is required not only for analyzing the role of coral
reefs in the global carbon cycle but also for predicting the future change of coral
reefs under rapidly changing environment.
4. SUMMARY
A system-level net organic-to-inorganic carbon production ratio is a master
parameter for controlling sink/source behavior of coral reefs with respect to
atmospheric CO2. Due to dominant carbonate production with negligible excess
organic carbon production in coral reef ecosystems, most coral reefs act as a net,
or at least CO2 source to the atmosphere. This rule is supported by observations
from atolls and barrier reefs in the western Pacific: higher pCO2 and lower total
alkalinity in the lagoon waters were evident compared to their offshore waters.
Reef topography, especially residence time of lagoon water, affects the carbon
budget of coral reefs to some extent. There is a relatively weak, but still
recognizable positive relationship between the lagoon-offshore difference in
pCO2 and residence time of reef water. Another important factor controlling
carbon turnover in coral reefs is proximity to land: terrestrial carbon and nutrient
inputs were recognized in most fringing and barrier types of reefs. Terrestrial
inputs of carbon and nutrient may enhance the CO2 release from coral reefs to the
atmosphere.
Acknowledgements—We express our appreciation to T. Ayukai of the Australian Institute
of Marine Science and F. Nishibori and K. Goto of the Kansai Environmental Engineering
Center Co. Ltd. (KANSO). The manuscript was improved by valuable comments from
two anonymous reviewers and L. P. Gupta of AIST. This study was supported by
“Northwest Pacific Carbon Cycle Study” consigned to the KANSO by the NEDO.
Additional supports were from “GCMAPS” funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology and “Study on the selection of biodiversity conservation
area of the coral reef” funded by the Ministry of the Environment of Japan.
REFERENCES
Atkinson, M. J. and S. V. Smith (1983): C:N:P ratios of benthic marine plants. Limnol. Oceanogr.,
28, 568–574.
Barnes D. J. and B. E. Chalker (1990): Calcification and photosynthesis in reef-building corals and
algae. p. 109–131. In Coral Reefs, Ecosystem of the World 25, ed. by Z. Dubinsky, Elsevier,
Amsterdam.
246
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Buddemeiwe, R. W. (1996): Coral reefs and carbon dioxide. Science, 271, 1298–1299.
Crossland, C. J., B. J. Hatcher and S. V. Smith (1991): Role of coral reefs in global ocean production.
Coral Reefs, 10, 55–64.
Frankignoulle, M., C. Canon and J.-P. Gattuso (1994): Marine calcification as a source of carbon
dioxide: Positive feedback of increasing atmospheric CO2. Limnol. Oceanogr., 39, 458–462.
Frankignoulle, M., J.-P. Gattuso, R. Biondo, I. Bourge, G. Copin-Montegut and M. Pichon (1996):
Carbon fluxes in coral reefs. II. Eulerian study of inorganic carbon dynamics and measurements
of air-sea CO2 exchange. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 145, 123–132.
Furnas, M. J., A. W. Mitchell and M. Skuza (1995): Nitrogen and phosphorous budgets for the central
Great Barrier Reef Shelf. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Research Report No. 36, 194
pp., Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
Gattuso, J.-P. and R. W. Buddemeier (2000): Ocean biogeochemistry: calcification and CO 2.
Science, 407, 313.
Gattuso, J.-P., M. Pichon, B. Delesalle and M. Frankignoulle (1993): Community metabolism and
air-sea CO 2 fluxes in a coral reef ecosystem (Moorea, French Polynesia). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.,
96, 259–267.
Gattuso, J.-P., M. Pichon and M. Frankignoulle (1995): Biological control of air-sea CO 2 flux: effect
of photosynthetic and calcifying marine organisms and ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 129,
307–312.
Gattuso, J.-P., M. Frankignoulle, S. V. Smith, J. R. Ware and R. Wollast (1996a): Coral reefs and
carbon dioxide. Science, 271, 1298.
Gattuso, J.-P., M. R. Pichon, B. Delesalle, C. Canon, G. Copin-Montegut and M. Pichon and M.
Frankignoulle (1996b): Carbon fluxes in coral reefs. I. Lagrangian measurements of community
metabolism and resulting air-sea CO 2 disequilibrium. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 145, 109–121.
Gattuso, J.-P., M. Frankignoulle and S. V. Smith (1999): Measurement of community metabolism
and significance in the coral reef CO2 source-sink debate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96,
13017–13022.
Hata, H., A. Suzuki, T. Maruyama, N. Kurano, S. Miyachi, Y. Ikeda and H. Kayanne (1998): Carbon
flux by suspended and sinking particles around the barrier reef of Palau, western Pacific. Limnol.
Oceanogr., 43, 1883–1893.
Hata, H., S. Kudo, H. Yammano, Y. Kurano, N. Kurano and H. Kayanne (2002): Organic carbon flux
in Shiraho coral reef (Ishigaki Island, Japan). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 232, 129–140.
Hughes, T. P., A. H. Baird, D. R. Bellwood, M. Card, S. R. Connolly, C. Folke, R. Grosberg, O.
Hoegh-Guldberg, J. B. C. Jackson, J. Kleypas, J. M. Lough, P. Marshall, M. Nyström, S. R.
Palumbi, J. M. Pandolfi, B. Rosen and J. Roughgarden (2003): Climate Change, Human Impacts,
and the Resilience of Coral Reefs. Science, 301, 929–933.
Iglesias-Rodriquez, M. D., R. Armstrong, R. Feely, R. Hood, J. Kleypas, J. Milliman, C. Sabine and
J. Sarmiento (2002): Progress made in study of ocean’s calcium carbonate budget. Eos Trans.
AGU, 83, 365–375.
Kawahata, H., A. Suzuki and K. Goto (1997): Coral reef ecosystems as a source of atmospheric CO 2:
evidence from pCO 2 measurements of surface waters. Coral Reefs, 16, 261–266.
Kawahata, H., I. Yukino and A. Suzuki (2000a): Terrestrial influence on the Shiraho fringing reef,
Ishigaki Island, Japan: high carbon input relative to phosphate. Coral reefs, 19, 172–178.
Kawahata, H., A. Suzuki, T. Ayukai and K. Goto (2000b): Distribution of the fugacity of carbon
dioxide in the surface seawater of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Chem., 72, 257–272.
Kayanne, H. (1996): Coral reefs and carbon dioxide. Science, 271, 1298.
Kayanne, H., A. Suzuki and H. Saito (1995): Diurnal changes in the partial pressure of carbon
dioxide in coral reef water. Science, 269, 214–216.
Kinsey, D. W. (1978): Productivity and calcification estimates using slack-water periods and field
enclosures. p. 439–468. In Coral Reefs: Research Methods, ed. by D. R. Stoddart and R. E.
Johannes, UNESCO, Paris.
Kinsey, D. W. and D. Hopley (1991): The significance of coral reef as global carbon sinks—response
to Greenhouse. Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol., Global Planet. Change Sect., 89,
363–377.
Reef Water CO 2 System and Carbon Production of Coral Reefs
247
Kleypas, J. A. (1997): Modeled estimates of global reef habitat and carbonate production since the
last glacial maximum. Paleoceanogr., 12, 533–545.
Kleypas, J. A., R. W. Buddemeier, D. Archer, J.-P. Gattuso, C. Langdon and B. N. Opdyke (1999):
Geochemical consequences of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide on coral reefs. Science,
284, 118–120.
Kleypas, J. A., R. W. Buddemeier and J.-P. Gattuso (2001): The future of coral reefs in an age of
global change. Int. J. Earth Sci., 90, 426–437.
Kohn, A. J. (1964): Notes on reef habitats and gastropod molluscs of a lagoon island at North Male
Atoll, Maldives. Atoll Res. Bull., 102, 1–5.
Kraines, S., Y. Suzuki, K. Yamada and H. Komiyama (1996): Separating biological and physical
changes in dissolved oxygen concentration in a coral reef. Limnol. Oceanogr., 41, 1790–1799.
Kraines, S., Y. Suzuki, T. Omori, K. Shitashima, S. Kanahara and H. Komiyama (1997): Carbonate
dynamics of the coral reef systems at Bora Bay, Miyako Island. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 156, 1–
16.
Kraines, S. B., A. Suzuki, T. Yanagi, M. Isobe, X. Guo and H. Komiyama (1999): Rapid water
exchange between the lagoon and open ocean at Majuro Atoll due to wind, waves and tide. J.
Geophys. Res., 104, 15635–15653.
Maragos, J. E. and C. W. Cook, Jr. (1995): The 1991–1992 rapid ecological assessment of Palau’s
coral reefs. Coral Reefs, 14, 237–252.
Mitchell, A. W. and M. J. Furnas (1996): Terrestrial inputs of nutrients and suspended sediments to
the GBR lagoon. p. 59–71. In Proceedings of the Great Barrier Reef Science, Use and
Management; A National Conference, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.
Nakamori, T., A. Suzuki and Y. Iryu (1992): Water circulation and carbon flux on Shiraho coral reef
of the Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Continent. Shelf Res., 12, 951–970.
Odum, H. T. and E. P. Odum (1955): Trophic structure and productivity of a windward coral reef
community on Eniwetok Atoll. Ecol. Monogr., 25, 291–320.
Ohde, S. and R. van Woesik (1999): Carbon dioxide flux and metabolic processes of a coral reef,
Okinawa. Bull. Mar. Sci., 65, 559–576.
Pickard, G. L., J. R. Donguy, C. Henin and F. Rougerie (1977): A review of the physical
oceanography of the Great Barrier Reef and western Coral Sea. Aust. Inst. Mar. Sci., Monogr.
Ser., 2, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, 134 pp.
Redfield, A. C., B. H. Ketchum and F. A. Richards (1963): The influence of organisms on the
composition of sea-water. p. 26–77. In The Sea, Vol. 2, ed. by M. N. Hill, Wiley.
Smith, S. V. (1978): Coral-reef area and the contributions of reefs to processes and resources of the
world’s oceans. Nature, 273, 225–226.
Smith, S. V. (1981): Marine macrophytes as a global carbon sink. Science, 211, 838–840.
Smith, S. V. (1988): Mass balance in coral reef-dominated area. p. 209–226. In Coastal-Offshore
Ecosystem Interactions, Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Vol. 22, ed. by B.-O.
Jansson, Springer, Berlin.
Smith, S. V. and P. L. Jokiel (1978): Water composition and biogeochemical gradients in the Canton
Atoll lagoon. Atoll Res. Bull., 221, 15–53.
Smith, S. V. and F. Pesret (1974): Processes of carbon dioxide flux in the Fanning Island lagoon.
Pacific Sci., 28, 225–245.
Smith, S. V., S. Chandra, L. Kwitko, R. C. Schneider, J. Schoonmaker, J. Seeto, T. Tebano and G.
W. Tribble (1984): Chemical stoichiometry of lagoonal metabolism. U. Hawaii/U. South Pacific
Internat. Sea Grant Prog. Tech. Rep. UNIHI-SEAGRANT-CR-84-02.
Suzuki, A. (1998): Combined effects of photosynthesis and calcification on the partial pressure of
carbon dioxide in seawater. J. Oceanogr., 54, 1–7.
Suzuki, A. and H. Kawahata (1999): Partial pressure of carbon dioxide in coral reef lagoon waters:
comparative study of atolls and barrier reefs in the Indo-Pacific Oceans. J. Oceanogr., 55, 731–
745.
Suzuki, A. and H. Kawahata (2003): Carbon budget of coral reef systems: an overview of
observations in fringing reefs, barrier reefs and atolls in the Indo-pacific region. Tellus, 55B,
428–444.
248
A. SUZUKI and H. KAWAHATA
Suzuki, A., T. Nakamori and H. Kayanne (1995): The Mechanism of production enhancement in
coral reef carbonate systems: model and empirical results. Sediment. Geol., 99, 259–280.
Suzuki, A., H. Kawahata and K. Goto (1997): Reef water CO2 system and carbon cycle in Majuro
Atoll, the Marshall Islands in the central Pacific. Proc. 8th Int. Coral Reef Symp., 1, 971–976.
Suzuki, A., H. Kawahata, T. Ayukai and K. Goto (2001): The oceanic CO 2 system and carbon budget
in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1243–1246.
Ware, J. R., S. V. Smith and M. L. Reaka-Kudla (1992): Coral reefs: sources or sinks of atmospheric
CO 2? Coral Reefs, 11, 127–130.
A. Suzuki (e-mail: [email protected]) and H. Kawahata