Download A Peppered Icon Enters the Genomic Era

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Peppered moth evolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Viewpoint
A Peppered Icon Enters the Genomic Era
Chris D. Jiggins
I
n any field of scientific endeavor, there are certain ideas or examples
that achieve iconic status, perhaps way
beyond their individual importance. In
evolutionary biology, iconic status has
certainly been achieved by the humble
peppered moth, Biston betularia. It is an
unlikely candidate for celebrity status;
it is a speckled black and white moth,
common in northern temperate regions
of Europe and North America. Like
many species, its wing patterns impart
an uncanny ability to blend into the
background when it rests on mottled
tree trunks. What has made this species
famous, however, is a remarkably rapid
evolutionary change in its coloration following the British Industrial Revolution,
from the typical peppered form, typica,
to a dark melanic form, carbonaria. A
single genetic locus controls the switch
from the typical to the melanic form,
so this represented a simple evolutionary change at a single gene (Kettlewell
1973). Recent work has uncovered the
genetic locus that controls this dramatic
change in appearance, offering new
insights into its evolutionary history
(van’t Hof et al. 2011).
Similar changes have been observed
in many moth species, but what gained
the peppered moth its iconic status
was evidence that linked the undisputed evolutionary change that had
occurred in the population to a causal
mechanism—namely, natural selection
by bird predators. A series of simple
but compelling release-and-recapture
experiments were carried out by
Bernard Kettlewell in the 1950s that
showed that dark moths had reduced
survival in rural Dorset (an unpolluted
area), whereas in polluted Manchester,
the pattern was reversed, with the
typical peppered form showing lower
survival (Kettlewell 1973). These field
studies were combined with caged-bird
experiments showing attack patterns
consistent with the survival patterns
www.biosciencemag.org seen in the field. In combination with
striking photographs of moths resting on lichen-covered and sooty tree
trunks (the dark moths are alarmingly conspicuous on the former), this
seemed to be one of the best documented examples of recent evolutionary change and became a textbook case
of natural selection in action.
Textbook examples deserve scrutiny every few years, if only to ensure
that the original evidence holds up.
The peppered moth came under such
scrutiny about 10 years ago. In a book on
melanism, Michael Majerus highlighted
some aspects of Kettlewell’s experiments
that were potentially unrealistic (Majerus
1998). The moths were placed on tree
trunks, rather than under branches
where they were thought to rest. The
moth densities tested were unrealistically
high. The different morphs were released
at unnatural frequencies. Subsequently,
Kettlewell has even been accused of
fraud, although such accusations seem
entirely unfounded (Hooper 2002). In
the 10 years between the publication
of his book and his tragic death in
2009, Majerus worked to rebut criticisms
of Kettlewell’s experiments. He documented natural resting places of wild
moths and showed that a significant
proportion do indeed rest on tree trunks.
More importantly, he also carried out a
long-term experiment near Cambridge,
United Kingdom, in which moths were
allowed to choose their own resting sites
and were then observed during daylight
hours for direct evidence of predation.
In an experiment that took six years,
involved nearly 5000 moths and countless hours of observation, differential
predation was observed and was, furthermore, strong enough to explain the
natural observed rate of decline in the
carbonaria morph during the experiment. Sadly, Majerus died before these
results were published. However, he presented the data at the European Society
of Evolutionary Biology meeting in
Uppsala in 2007, and it is to be hoped
that these valuable experiments will
eventually be published.
Clean-air legislation in the United
Kingdom has led to a welcome return
to mottled soot-free tree trunks and
a steady decline in frequency of the
carbonaria morph. Indeed, it is now
so rare in most parts of the United
Kingdom that field studies of natural
selection will soon no longer be possible. However, just as one era is ending,
the study of B. betularia has entered
a new genomic era. The genetic locus
that controls the carbonaria morph has
recently been identified through genetic
linkage mapping and gene-cloning
techniques (van’t Hof et al. 2011). A
sequence comparison of typica and
carbonaria moths identified a unique
sequence signature in all carbonaria
individuals across a relatively broad
region of the genome. This result confirms the hypothesis that the form has
a single origin in the United Kingdom,
which was already strongly implied by
the geographic spread of carbonaria
morphs after the first specimen was
collected near Manchester in 1848. The
genetic signature associated with typica
forms is more complex, as would be
expected if this were the ancestral, older
form. These new population genetic
data therefore provide strong support
for the classic story, whereby a novel
mutation arose once and spread rapidly
by strong natural selection.
So far, the broad genome region controlling carbonaria has been identified,
but the actual gene or mutation responsible has not. Nonetheless, the data
offer a couple of intriguing insights
into the genetic mechanism underlying
the change. First, the region identified
does not contain any genes known to
be involved in pigment production. In
particular, studies of fruit flies with different patterns of wing and body spots
September 2011 / Vol. 61 No. 9 • BioScience 655
Viewpoint
have repeatedly shown the involvement
of a handful of pigment-synthesis genes
in evolutionary change (Wittkopp
et al. 2003). These genes have helpful
names, such as ebony, yellow, and tan,
that reflect the colorful (well, mainly
grayscale) effects of their laboratory
mutants. However, none of these genes
were found at the carbonaria locus
(van’t Hof et al. 2011). It seems likely
that carbonaria is in fact a gene located
upstream—a regulatory locus rather
than a pigmentation gene.
This hypothesis gains further support
from another remarkable observation.
The locus of the carbonaria morph corresponds closely to a genome region
already identified in our studies of
butterflies. This locus controls yellow
and white pattern elements in several
species of mimetic tropical butterflies
in the genus Heliconius (Joron et al.
2006). The same locus has since also
been implicated in another genus of
butterflies, Bicyclus, as containing genes
that have major mutational effects in
wing patterns—notably, a mutant called
Bigeye (Beldade et al. 2009). This result
is surprising: Butterfly wing eyespots,
yellow bands, and overall melanization
in a moth would not seem to be homologous patterns. Furthermore, these species
are separated by more than 100 million
years of evolution. The implication that
there is a common mechanism of genetic
control in these divergent lineages would
seem to suggest an ancient shared patterning system in the Macrolepidoptera.
So after a period in which the peppered moth seemed to have lost its
iconic status, it should now be returned
to its rightful place in the evolutionary
textbooks. Kettlewell’s experiments have
been vindicated. And genetic data provide a novel line of support for the original hypothesis of a single mutational
origin for the dark carbonaria form. Of
course, as is always the case in biology,
there are surprises, and the study of a
recent evolutionary change in response
to industrialization has provided evidence for an ancient shared patterning
system dating back to the early diversification of the Lepidoptera. The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms
underlying this patterning system will
provide an exciting challenge for the
next few years.
References cited
Beldade P, Saenko SV, Pul N, Long AD. 2009. A
gene-based linkage map for Bicyclus anynana
butterflies allows for a more comprehensive
analysis of synteny with the lepidopteran reference genomre. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000366.
Hooper J. 2002. Of Moths and Men: An Evolutionary Tale—The Untold Story of Science
and the Peppered Moth. Norton.
Joron M, et al. 2006. A conserved supergene
locus controls colour pattern diversity in
Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biology 4: e303.
Kettlewell B. 1973. The Evolution of Melanism:
The Study of Recurring Necessity, with
Special Reference to Industrial Melanism in
the Lepidoptera. Blackwell.
Majerus MEN. 1998. Melanism: Evolution in
Action. Oxford University Press.
Van’t Hof AE, Edmonds N, Dalíková M, Marek F,
Saccheri IJ. 2011, Industrial melanism in British peppered moths has a singular and recent
mutational origin. Science 332: 958–960.
Wittkopp PJ, Carroll SB, Kopp A. 2003. Evolution in black and white: Genetic control of
pigment patterns in Drosophila. Trends in
Genetics 19: 495–504.
Chris D. Jiggins ([email protected]) is
affiliated with the Department of Zoology at the
University of Cambridge, England.
doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.9.3
Enter the Faces of Biology Photo Contest
Communicate Your Research Through Imagery
The Grand Prize Winner will have his/her winning photo featured on
the cover of BioScience, and will receive $250 and a one year
membership in AIBS.
The contest ends on September 30, 2011.
To enter, visit http://www.aibs.org/public-programs/photocontest.html
656 BioScience • September 2011 / Vol. 61 No. 9
www.biosciencemag.org