Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Time in physics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Analytical orbital theory analysis of electron confinement in a Polywell™ device David Gummersall |PhD Student Supervised by Dr Joe Khachan Image: R. W. Bussard, 57th International Astronautical Congress, 2006 Aims Aims for our analysis was to analytically derive expressions for: 1. Electron confinement scaling laws. 2. The average radial electron turning distances. 3. Power loss expressions for maintaining equilibrium electron density. These expressions were derived from an orbit theory analysis or first principles approach. Comparisons will be made with previous orbit theory simulations 2 Polywell™ a virtual cathode system Magnetic null Fig. 1 Magnetic field structure inside Polywell™, highlighting the magnetic null. Fig. 2 A three dimensional schematic layout of Buzzard’s Polywell™ design. • Central minimum magnetic field has certain plasma M.H.D. Stability properties. • Virtual cathode may form due to space charge trapping of electrons. • Ions are then electrostatically confined by the electron’s electric field. Fig 1. Image: N. Krall, Physics of Plasmas, 2, 1995. Reformatted in colour by Mark Duncan, 2007 3 Grid less IEC Magnetic null Fig. 1 Magnetic field structure inside Polywell™, highlighting the magnetic null. Fig. 3 Spindle cusp magnetic field line projection along with guiding center particle orbits. • Spindle cusp generates a circular line cusp. • Polywell effectively ‘plugs’ this line cusp. • 2 point and 1 line cusp VS 14 point cusps. Fig 3. J. Egedal and A. Fasoli, Physics of Plasmas, 8, 2001. 4 Trapped electron motion 5 Orbit theory simulation and parameter set Five main parameters of interest: • Low Beta regime. • Non-interacting condition. 6 Magnetic cusp reflection RT Coils r0 7 Derivation of r0 and B0 Adiabatically invariant only if: where Two equations: ~ (1) (2) , Eqn. 2: M. Carr, D. Gummersall, S. Cornish and J. Khachan, Physics of Plasmas, 18, 2011 8 Confinement time model Assume magnetic cusp acts like a 1D magnetic mirror. System was adiabatically invariant a short distance from the central magnetic null. where Bm is the maximum strength of the magnetic field and B0 is the strength of the magnetic field in the weakest section of the adiabatically invariant path. Using and 9 Confinement time analysis 0 Fig. 4 A sample of fitted curves to a 1 m radius Polywell™ with 100 eV electrons where the line data were the best fit curves to corresponding data. Time constant/scaling law: 0 10 4th order Magnetic field fit Magnetic field for R=I=1 where Can invert B(ra) to get a close approximation of ra(B). Use this to find a more accurate RT as BT is known via: 11 Comparisons with simulation data RT/R RT/R From simulation data we get the time-weighted average electron radial distance. This can be interpreted as roughly RT as radial velocity is zero at turning point. Used only the electrons which stayed within the Polywell for 10xT.O.F. in absence of magnetic fields. For a given current and electron energy can determine the average radius of electron. Hence can predict if electrons will be confined. 12 Polywell power loss Power loss defined by: After substitutions: Total power loss: Power loss density: Where Nmax and ρmax are the maximum electron total number and density, respectively. For a 1 litre volume R = 4 cm ρmax = 1016 m-3 K = 10 keV I = 106 A.Turns Pl ~ 200 kW • No space charge effects • No scattering • No application of ChildLangmuir Law 13 Current and future work Current simulation is a 1D2V Gyrokinetic, leapfrog, PIC modeling of point cusps. Simulation improvements: • Expand model to 2D3V dimensions. • Include full 2D electron motion. • Include electron-electron scattering. • Explore electrostatic ‘plugging’ of cusps (Doland, 1994). • Include ion interactions with electron plasma. 14